创新项目组合管理的替代方法

IF 5.1 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Project Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1177/87569728241242429
Siiri Tuominen, Miia Martinsuo
{"title":"创新项目组合管理的替代方法","authors":"Siiri Tuominen, Miia Martinsuo","doi":"10.1177/87569728241242429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The governance of projects is often treated operationally, as project portfolio management. Project portfolio governance is more strategic and continuous than project portfolio management, but its various approaches are weakly understood. This study explores project portfolio governance in innovative companies. The resulting framework characterizes governance approaches in terms of the authority given to portfolio actors and the rhythm of using governance practices. Differences among the delegated, regulated, and consultative governance approaches appear to stem from the industry clock speed, innovation portfolio type, and organizational context. This study differentiates project portfolio governance approaches as part of organizational project management governance.","PeriodicalId":47967,"journal":{"name":"Project Management Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Approaches to Innovation Project Portfolio Governance\",\"authors\":\"Siiri Tuominen, Miia Martinsuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87569728241242429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The governance of projects is often treated operationally, as project portfolio management. Project portfolio governance is more strategic and continuous than project portfolio management, but its various approaches are weakly understood. This study explores project portfolio governance in innovative companies. The resulting framework characterizes governance approaches in terms of the authority given to portfolio actors and the rhythm of using governance practices. Differences among the delegated, regulated, and consultative governance approaches appear to stem from the industry clock speed, innovation portfolio type, and organizational context. This study differentiates project portfolio governance approaches as part of organizational project management governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Project Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Project Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241242429\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Project Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241242429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

项目的治理通常被当作项目组合管理来操作。与项目组合管理相比,项目组合治理更具战略性和连续性,但人们对其各种方法的了解还很薄弱。本研究探讨了创新型企业的项目组合管理。由此产生的框架从赋予项目组合参与者的权力和使用治理方法的节奏两个方面描述了治理方法的特点。授权型、监管型和协商型治理方法之间的差异似乎源于行业时钟速度、创新组合类型和组织背景。本研究将项目组合治理方法作为组织项目管理治理的一部分加以区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alternative Approaches to Innovation Project Portfolio Governance
The governance of projects is often treated operationally, as project portfolio management. Project portfolio governance is more strategic and continuous than project portfolio management, but its various approaches are weakly understood. This study explores project portfolio governance in innovative companies. The resulting framework characterizes governance approaches in terms of the authority given to portfolio actors and the rhythm of using governance practices. Differences among the delegated, regulated, and consultative governance approaches appear to stem from the industry clock speed, innovation portfolio type, and organizational context. This study differentiates project portfolio governance approaches as part of organizational project management governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
14.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Project Management Journal (PMJ) is the academic and research journal of the Project Management Institute and features state-of-the-art research, techniques, theories, and applications in project management. Projects represent a growing population of human activity in large, small, private, and public organizations. Projects are used to execute and sustain today's organizational activities. They play a fundamental role as the engine of tomorrow's innovation, value creation, and strategic change. However, projects often fail to deliver their promise. PMJ addresses these multiple challenges and opportunities by encouraging the development and application of novel theories, concepts, frameworks, research methods, and designs. PMJ embraces contributions both from within and beyond project management to augment and transform theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Connections Between Project Management Offices and Organizational Design Tensions in Digital Transformation: How Prototype Work Links the Temporary and the Permanent An Action Theory of the Project Managing Finances in Scaled Agile Transformations: Insights from A Case Study of a German Automotive Manufacturer Raison d'Etre of Organization Design Arrangements in Project-Based Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1