舍曲林和认知行为疗法对强迫症患者行为抑制的不同影响。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Clinical Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1097/yic.0000000000000548
Jemma E Reid, Luca Pellegrini, Lynne Drummond, Yana Varlakova, Sonia Shahper, David S Baldwin, Christopher Manson, Samuel R Chamberlain, Trevor W Robbins, David Wellsted, Naomi A Fineberg
{"title":"舍曲林和认知行为疗法对强迫症患者行为抑制的不同影响。","authors":"Jemma E Reid, Luca Pellegrini, Lynne Drummond, Yana Varlakova, Sonia Shahper, David S Baldwin, Christopher Manson, Samuel R Chamberlain, Trevor W Robbins, David Wellsted, Naomi A Fineberg","doi":"10.1097/yic.0000000000000548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) randomised to sertraline, manualised cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), or combination (sertraline + CBT), underwent cognitive assessment. Cognitive testing was conducted at baseline and at week 16. The stop signal reaction time task (SSRT) was used to evaluate motor impulsivity and attentional flexibility was evaluated using the intra/extra-dimensional set shifting task. Paired-samples t-tests or nonparametric variants were used to compare baseline and posttreatment scores within each treatment group. Forty-five patients were tested at baseline (sertraline n = 14; CBT n = 14; sertraline + CBT n = 17) and 23 patients at week 16 (sertraline n = 6; CBT n = 7; sertraline + CBT n = 10). The mean dosage of sertraline was numerically higher in those taking sertraline as a monotherapy (166.67 mg) compared with those taking sertraline in combination with CBT (100 mg). Analysis of pre-post treatment scores using an intent-to-treat-analysis found a significant reduction in the SSRT in those treated with sertraline, whilst there was no significant change on this task for those treated with CBT or the combination. This study found that motor inhibition improved significantly following sertraline monotherapy. Suboptimal sertraline dosing might explain the failure to detect an effect on motor inhibition in the group receiving combination of sertraline + CBT. Higher dose sertraline may have broader cognitive effects than CBT for OCD, motor impulsivity may have value as a measure of treatment outcome and, by extension, the SSRT could serve as a biomarker for personalising care.","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential effects of sertraline and cognitive behavioural therapy on behavioural inhibition in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Jemma E Reid, Luca Pellegrini, Lynne Drummond, Yana Varlakova, Sonia Shahper, David S Baldwin, Christopher Manson, Samuel R Chamberlain, Trevor W Robbins, David Wellsted, Naomi A Fineberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/yic.0000000000000548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) randomised to sertraline, manualised cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), or combination (sertraline + CBT), underwent cognitive assessment. Cognitive testing was conducted at baseline and at week 16. The stop signal reaction time task (SSRT) was used to evaluate motor impulsivity and attentional flexibility was evaluated using the intra/extra-dimensional set shifting task. Paired-samples t-tests or nonparametric variants were used to compare baseline and posttreatment scores within each treatment group. Forty-five patients were tested at baseline (sertraline n = 14; CBT n = 14; sertraline + CBT n = 17) and 23 patients at week 16 (sertraline n = 6; CBT n = 7; sertraline + CBT n = 10). The mean dosage of sertraline was numerically higher in those taking sertraline as a monotherapy (166.67 mg) compared with those taking sertraline in combination with CBT (100 mg). Analysis of pre-post treatment scores using an intent-to-treat-analysis found a significant reduction in the SSRT in those treated with sertraline, whilst there was no significant change on this task for those treated with CBT or the combination. This study found that motor inhibition improved significantly following sertraline monotherapy. Suboptimal sertraline dosing might explain the failure to detect an effect on motor inhibition in the group receiving combination of sertraline + CBT. Higher dose sertraline may have broader cognitive effects than CBT for OCD, motor impulsivity may have value as a measure of treatment outcome and, by extension, the SSRT could serve as a biomarker for personalising care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/yic.0000000000000548\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/yic.0000000000000548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强迫症(OCD)患者随机接受舍曲林、人工认知行为疗法(CBT)或组合疗法(舍曲林 + CBT)治疗,并接受认知评估。认知测试在基线和第16周进行。停止信号反应时间任务(SSRT)用于评估运动冲动性,而注意力灵活性则通过内部/外部维度集合转移任务进行评估。采用配对样本 t 检验或非参数变体来比较各治疗组的基线和治疗后得分。45名患者接受了基线测试(舍曲林 n = 14;CBT n = 14;舍曲林 + CBT n = 17),23名患者接受了第16周测试(舍曲林 n = 6;CBT n = 7;舍曲林 + CBT n = 10)。与舍曲林联合 CBT(100 毫克)相比,舍曲林单药治疗患者的平均用量更高(166.67 毫克)。采用意向治疗分析法对治疗前和治疗后的得分进行分析后发现,接受舍曲林治疗的患者的SSRT显著降低,而接受CBT或联合治疗的患者在这项任务上没有显著变化。这项研究发现,在接受舍曲林单药治疗后,运动抑制能力明显改善。舍曲林剂量不够理想可能是接受舍曲林+CBT联合治疗组未能检测到运动抑制效果的原因。大剂量舍曲林对强迫症的认知效果可能比CBT更广泛,运动冲动性可能具有衡量治疗效果的价值,推而广之,SSRT可作为个性化护理的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differential effects of sertraline and cognitive behavioural therapy on behavioural inhibition in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder.
Patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) randomised to sertraline, manualised cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), or combination (sertraline + CBT), underwent cognitive assessment. Cognitive testing was conducted at baseline and at week 16. The stop signal reaction time task (SSRT) was used to evaluate motor impulsivity and attentional flexibility was evaluated using the intra/extra-dimensional set shifting task. Paired-samples t-tests or nonparametric variants were used to compare baseline and posttreatment scores within each treatment group. Forty-five patients were tested at baseline (sertraline n = 14; CBT n = 14; sertraline + CBT n = 17) and 23 patients at week 16 (sertraline n = 6; CBT n = 7; sertraline + CBT n = 10). The mean dosage of sertraline was numerically higher in those taking sertraline as a monotherapy (166.67 mg) compared with those taking sertraline in combination with CBT (100 mg). Analysis of pre-post treatment scores using an intent-to-treat-analysis found a significant reduction in the SSRT in those treated with sertraline, whilst there was no significant change on this task for those treated with CBT or the combination. This study found that motor inhibition improved significantly following sertraline monotherapy. Suboptimal sertraline dosing might explain the failure to detect an effect on motor inhibition in the group receiving combination of sertraline + CBT. Higher dose sertraline may have broader cognitive effects than CBT for OCD, motor impulsivity may have value as a measure of treatment outcome and, by extension, the SSRT could serve as a biomarker for personalising care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
23.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Clinical Psychopharmacology provides an essential link between research and clinical practice throughout psychopharmacology. It reports on studies in human subjects, both healthy volunteers and patients, which relate the effects of drugs on psychological processes. A major objective of the journal is to publish fully refereed papers which throw light on the ways in which the study of psychotropic drugs can increase our understanding of psychopharmacology. To this end the journal publishes results of early Phase I and II studies, as well as those of controlled clinical trials of psychotropic drugs in Phase II and IV. Other topics covered include the epidemiology of psychotropic drug prescribing and drug taking, the sociology of psychotropic drugs including compliance, and research into the safety and adverse effects of these compounds.
期刊最新文献
Safety and tolerability of cariprazine for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of phase 2b/phase 3 clinical trials. Differed spontaneous dissociative symptoms following the use of esketamine intranasal spray in a patient suffering from treatment-resistant depression: a case report. Dropped-Head syndrome: a possible new variant of clozapine-induced inflammation during titration. Understanding mood disorder treatments. When antidepressants meet the gut microbiota: implications and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1