让我们运动起来小儿心脏移植后的有氧运动能力、肌肉力量和肌肉耐力

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1111/petr.14731
Amanda R. Krysler, Chantal J. Allan, Ingrid Larsen, Sunita Mathur, Catherine Morgan, Steven C. Greenway, Tom Blydt‐Hansen, Michael Khoury, Lori J. West, Simon Urschel
{"title":"让我们运动起来小儿心脏移植后的有氧运动能力、肌肉力量和肌肉耐力","authors":"Amanda R. Krysler, Chantal J. Allan, Ingrid Larsen, Sunita Mathur, Catherine Morgan, Steven C. Greenway, Tom Blydt‐Hansen, Michael Khoury, Lori J. West, Simon Urschel","doi":"10.1111/petr.14731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPediatric heart (HTx) and kidney transplant (KTx) recipients may have lower physical fitness than healthy children. This study sought to quantify fitness levels in transplant recipients, investigate associations to clinical factors and quality of life, and identify whether a quick, simple wall‐sit test is feasible as a surrogate for overall fitness for longitudinal assessment.MethodsAerobic capacity (6‐min walk test, 6MWT), normalized muscle strength, muscle endurance, physical activity questionnaire (PAQ), and quality of life (PedsQL™) were prospectively assessed in transplanted children and matched healthy controls.ResultsTwenty‐two HTx were compared to 20 controls and 6 KTx. 6MWT %predicted was shorter in HTx (87.2 [69.9–118.6] %) than controls (99.9 [80.4–120] %), but similar to KTx (90.3 [78.6–115] %). Muscle strength was lower in HTx deltoids (6.15 [4.35–11.3] kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and KTx quadriceps (9.27 [8.65–19.1] kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) versus controls. Similarly, muscle endurance was lower in HTx push‐ups (28.6 [0–250] %predicted), KTx push‐ups (8.35 [0–150] %predicted), HTx curl‐ups (115 [0–450] %predicted), and KTx wall‐sit time (18.5 [10.0–54.0] s) than controls. In contrast to HTx with only 9%, all KTx were receiving steroid therapy. The wall‐sit test significantly correlated with other fitness parameters (normalized quadriceps strength <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = .31, #push‐ups <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = .39, and #curl‐ups <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = .43) and PedsQL™ (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = .36).ConclusionsCompared to controls, pediatric HTx and KTx have similarly lower aerobic capacity, but different deficits in muscle strength, likely related to steroid therapy in KTx. The convenient wall‐sit test correlates with fitness and reported quality of life, and thus could be a useful easy routine for longitudinal assessment.","PeriodicalId":20038,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Transplantation","volume":"276 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let's get physical: Aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and muscle endurance after pediatric heart transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Amanda R. Krysler, Chantal J. Allan, Ingrid Larsen, Sunita Mathur, Catherine Morgan, Steven C. Greenway, Tom Blydt‐Hansen, Michael Khoury, Lori J. West, Simon Urschel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/petr.14731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundPediatric heart (HTx) and kidney transplant (KTx) recipients may have lower physical fitness than healthy children. This study sought to quantify fitness levels in transplant recipients, investigate associations to clinical factors and quality of life, and identify whether a quick, simple wall‐sit test is feasible as a surrogate for overall fitness for longitudinal assessment.MethodsAerobic capacity (6‐min walk test, 6MWT), normalized muscle strength, muscle endurance, physical activity questionnaire (PAQ), and quality of life (PedsQL™) were prospectively assessed in transplanted children and matched healthy controls.ResultsTwenty‐two HTx were compared to 20 controls and 6 KTx. 6MWT %predicted was shorter in HTx (87.2 [69.9–118.6] %) than controls (99.9 [80.4–120] %), but similar to KTx (90.3 [78.6–115] %). Muscle strength was lower in HTx deltoids (6.15 [4.35–11.3] kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and KTx quadriceps (9.27 [8.65–19.1] kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) versus controls. Similarly, muscle endurance was lower in HTx push‐ups (28.6 [0–250] %predicted), KTx push‐ups (8.35 [0–150] %predicted), HTx curl‐ups (115 [0–450] %predicted), and KTx wall‐sit time (18.5 [10.0–54.0] s) than controls. In contrast to HTx with only 9%, all KTx were receiving steroid therapy. The wall‐sit test significantly correlated with other fitness parameters (normalized quadriceps strength <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = .31, #push‐ups <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = .39, and #curl‐ups <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = .43) and PedsQL™ (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> = .36).ConclusionsCompared to controls, pediatric HTx and KTx have similarly lower aerobic capacity, but different deficits in muscle strength, likely related to steroid therapy in KTx. The convenient wall‐sit test correlates with fitness and reported quality of life, and thus could be a useful easy routine for longitudinal assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"276 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14731\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14731","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景小儿心脏(HTx)和肾脏移植(KTx)受者的体能可能低于健康儿童。本研究旨在量化移植受者的体能水平,调查其与临床因素和生活质量的关系,并确定快速、简单的壁坐测试是否可以作为纵向评估整体体能的替代指标。方法对移植儿童和匹配的健康对照组的有氧能力(6 分钟步行测试,6MWT)、归一化肌力、肌耐力、体力活动问卷(PAQ)和生活质量(PedsQL™)进行前瞻性评估。HTx 的 6MWT 预测百分比(87.2 [69.9-118.6] %)短于对照组(99.9 [80.4-120] %),但与 KTx(90.3 [78.6-115] %)相似。与对照组相比,HTx 三角肌(6.15 [4.35-11.3] kg/m2)和 KTx 股四头肌(9.27 [8.65-19.1] kg/m2)的肌肉力量较低。同样,与对照组相比,HTx 俯卧撑(28.6 [0-250] %预测值)、KTx 俯卧撑(8.35 [0-150] %预测值)、HTx 卷发(115 [0-450] %预测值)和 KTx 坐墙时间(18.5 [10.0-54.0] 秒)的肌肉耐力也较低。与只有 9% 的 HTx 相反,所有 KTx 都在接受类固醇治疗。坐墙测试与其他体能参数(归一化股四头肌力量 R = .31、#push-ups R = .39、#curl-ups R = .43)和 PedsQL™ (R = .36)有明显相关性。方便的壁坐测试与体能和报告的生活质量相关,因此可作为纵向评估的有用简便常规方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Let's get physical: Aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and muscle endurance after pediatric heart transplantation
BackgroundPediatric heart (HTx) and kidney transplant (KTx) recipients may have lower physical fitness than healthy children. This study sought to quantify fitness levels in transplant recipients, investigate associations to clinical factors and quality of life, and identify whether a quick, simple wall‐sit test is feasible as a surrogate for overall fitness for longitudinal assessment.MethodsAerobic capacity (6‐min walk test, 6MWT), normalized muscle strength, muscle endurance, physical activity questionnaire (PAQ), and quality of life (PedsQL™) were prospectively assessed in transplanted children and matched healthy controls.ResultsTwenty‐two HTx were compared to 20 controls and 6 KTx. 6MWT %predicted was shorter in HTx (87.2 [69.9–118.6] %) than controls (99.9 [80.4–120] %), but similar to KTx (90.3 [78.6–115] %). Muscle strength was lower in HTx deltoids (6.15 [4.35–11.3] kg/m2) and KTx quadriceps (9.27 [8.65–19.1] kg/m2) versus controls. Similarly, muscle endurance was lower in HTx push‐ups (28.6 [0–250] %predicted), KTx push‐ups (8.35 [0–150] %predicted), HTx curl‐ups (115 [0–450] %predicted), and KTx wall‐sit time (18.5 [10.0–54.0] s) than controls. In contrast to HTx with only 9%, all KTx were receiving steroid therapy. The wall‐sit test significantly correlated with other fitness parameters (normalized quadriceps strength R = .31, #push‐ups R = .39, and #curl‐ups R = .43) and PedsQL™ (R = .36).ConclusionsCompared to controls, pediatric HTx and KTx have similarly lower aerobic capacity, but different deficits in muscle strength, likely related to steroid therapy in KTx. The convenient wall‐sit test correlates with fitness and reported quality of life, and thus could be a useful easy routine for longitudinal assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Transplantation
Pediatric Transplantation 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
216
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Pediatric Transplantation is to publish original articles of the highest quality on clinical experience and basic research in transplantation of tissues and solid organs in infants, children and adolescents. The journal seeks to disseminate the latest information widely to all individuals involved in kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestine and stem cell (bone-marrow) transplantation. In addition, the journal publishes focused reviews on topics relevant to pediatric transplantation as well as timely editorial comment on controversial issues.
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood-Level Deprivation Impacts Graft and Patient Outcomes Among Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients. Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis or Acute Cellular Rejection? Natural Killer Cell Phenotypes and Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation. The Impact of Early Indication of Living Donor Liver Transplantation on the Outcomes of Patients With Propionic Acidemia: A Single-Center Experience. Do Social Determinants of Health Impact Pediatric VAD Outcomes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1