在英国引入全血成分治疗创伤性出血的可行性

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1111/tme.13039
Josephine McCullagh, Peter Basham, Jane Davies, Vicky Hicks, Alastair Hunter, Julia Lancut, Laura Green
{"title":"在英国引入全血成分治疗创伤性出血的可行性","authors":"Josephine McCullagh, Peter Basham, Jane Davies, Vicky Hicks, Alastair Hunter, Julia Lancut, Laura Green","doi":"10.1111/tme.13039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe interest in re‐introducing whole blood (WB) transfusion for the management of traumatic major haemorrhage is increasing. However, due to the current leucodepletion filters used in the UK a WB component was not readily available. Instead, an alternative but similar component, leucocyte depleted red cell and plasma (LD‐RCP), which provided a unique experience in assessing the feasibility of a WB component was used whilst a WB component was being manufactured.Study Design and MethodsBetween November 2018 and October 2020, LD‐RCP replaced RBC as standard of care for all trauma patients with major haemorrhage in London. The aims of the study were to assess (a) deliverability, (b) component wastage and (c) safety.ResultsOver the study period a total of 1208 LD‐RCP units were delivered, of which 96.5% were delivered ‘On Time In Full’ (OTIF). Of the 1208 units, 733 (60.68%) were transfused and 475 (39.3%) units were wasted. Component wastage reduced significantly throughout the study (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001). A total of 177 patients had a blood group recorded, 86 were group O and 91 were non‐group O. There was no statistically significantly difference between haemoglobin (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.422), or bilirubin levels (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.084) between group O and non‐group O patients.DiscussionIt was feasible for NHS Blood and Transplant to deliver LD‐RCP on time in full, however component wastage was high due to short shelf life and limited use of the component. Low titre group O LD‐RCP units were not associated with clinical evidence of haemolysis.","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The feasibility of introducing a whole blood component for traumatic haemorrhage in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Josephine McCullagh, Peter Basham, Jane Davies, Vicky Hicks, Alastair Hunter, Julia Lancut, Laura Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tme.13039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe interest in re‐introducing whole blood (WB) transfusion for the management of traumatic major haemorrhage is increasing. However, due to the current leucodepletion filters used in the UK a WB component was not readily available. Instead, an alternative but similar component, leucocyte depleted red cell and plasma (LD‐RCP), which provided a unique experience in assessing the feasibility of a WB component was used whilst a WB component was being manufactured.Study Design and MethodsBetween November 2018 and October 2020, LD‐RCP replaced RBC as standard of care for all trauma patients with major haemorrhage in London. The aims of the study were to assess (a) deliverability, (b) component wastage and (c) safety.ResultsOver the study period a total of 1208 LD‐RCP units were delivered, of which 96.5% were delivered ‘On Time In Full’ (OTIF). Of the 1208 units, 733 (60.68%) were transfused and 475 (39.3%) units were wasted. Component wastage reduced significantly throughout the study (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001). A total of 177 patients had a blood group recorded, 86 were group O and 91 were non‐group O. There was no statistically significantly difference between haemoglobin (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.422), or bilirubin levels (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.084) between group O and non‐group O patients.DiscussionIt was feasible for NHS Blood and Transplant to deliver LD‐RCP on time in full, however component wastage was high due to short shelf life and limited use of the component. Low titre group O LD‐RCP units were not associated with clinical evidence of haemolysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景重新引入全血(WB)输注治疗创伤性大出血的兴趣日益浓厚。然而,由于英国目前使用的去白细胞过滤器,无法随时提供全血成分。研究设计和方法2018 年 11 月至 2020 年 10 月期间,LD-RCP 取代 RBC 成为伦敦所有创伤大出血患者的标准治疗方法。研究的目的是评估 (a) 交付能力、(b) 成分浪费和 (c) 安全性。结果在研究期间,共交付了 1208 个 LD-RCP 单位,其中 96.5% 是 "按时足量"(OTIF)交付的。在这 1208 个单位中,733 个(60.68%)被输注,475 个(39.3%)被浪费。在整个研究过程中,成分浪费明显减少(p = 0.001)。O组和非O组患者的血红蛋白(p = 0.422)和胆红素水平(p = 0.084)在统计学上没有明显差异。讨论NHS血液与移植部门按时足量提供低滴度LD-RCP是可行的,但由于该成分保质期短且使用有限,成分浪费率较高。O组低滴度LD-RCP单位与溶血的临床证据无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The feasibility of introducing a whole blood component for traumatic haemorrhage in the UK
BackgroundThe interest in re‐introducing whole blood (WB) transfusion for the management of traumatic major haemorrhage is increasing. However, due to the current leucodepletion filters used in the UK a WB component was not readily available. Instead, an alternative but similar component, leucocyte depleted red cell and plasma (LD‐RCP), which provided a unique experience in assessing the feasibility of a WB component was used whilst a WB component was being manufactured.Study Design and MethodsBetween November 2018 and October 2020, LD‐RCP replaced RBC as standard of care for all trauma patients with major haemorrhage in London. The aims of the study were to assess (a) deliverability, (b) component wastage and (c) safety.ResultsOver the study period a total of 1208 LD‐RCP units were delivered, of which 96.5% were delivered ‘On Time In Full’ (OTIF). Of the 1208 units, 733 (60.68%) were transfused and 475 (39.3%) units were wasted. Component wastage reduced significantly throughout the study (p = 0.001). A total of 177 patients had a blood group recorded, 86 were group O and 91 were non‐group O. There was no statistically significantly difference between haemoglobin (p = 0.422), or bilirubin levels (p = 0.084) between group O and non‐group O patients.DiscussionIt was feasible for NHS Blood and Transplant to deliver LD‐RCP on time in full, however component wastage was high due to short shelf life and limited use of the component. Low titre group O LD‐RCP units were not associated with clinical evidence of haemolysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine
Transfusion Medicine 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology. In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Practice of ABO antibody titration in a transplant center: From tube method to manual gel column testing to automated column agglutination technology. Understanding hepcidin for iron management in pregnancy. Alloanti-Hy in antenatal patients: A multi-case review. Comparison of conventional coagulation tests and ROTEM in identifying trauma-induced coagulopathy for massive haemorrhage protocol activation. Extracellular vesicles in ageing cold-stored whole blood may not compensate for the decreasing haemostatic function in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1