博士学位并不意味着你就是 "博士":文化相关教学法在教育和社会文化方面的体现

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal for Multicultural Education Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1108/jme-10-2023-0115
Marcus Wayne Johnson, Anthony Johnson, Langston Clark, Jonathan E. Howe, Traveon Jefferson, Dionte McClendon, Brandon Crooms, Daniel J. Thomas
{"title":"博士学位并不意味着你就是 \"博士\":文化相关教学法在教育和社会文化方面的体现","authors":"Marcus Wayne Johnson, Anthony Johnson, Langston Clark, Jonathan E. Howe, Traveon Jefferson, Dionte McClendon, Brandon Crooms, Daniel J. Thomas","doi":"10.1108/jme-10-2023-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to stimulate scholarly attention and practical application pertaining to individuals recognized as “Docs.” Through conducting a comprehensive analysis and acquiring a profound understanding of its many connotations, the objective is to shift attitudes and approaches concerning those who are seen to possess knowledge and value within society.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>For this study, culturally relevant pedagogies were used as theoretical frameworks in addition to Sankofa and concept explication being used as methodologies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors identified three themes: (1) honorary cultural practice-community nomination of “professahs” and “docs,” (2) (Black) robinhoods – cultural signifiers of distinction and relatability and (3) docs as catalysts – elevating community via consciousness, trust and mentorship as significant understandings of this distinction.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study emphasizes the importance of “Docs” in both academic and social contexts. The role of “Docs” serves to alleviate potential conflicts of being a Black intellectual. This study further reveals the ways in which Docs align with, promote or possibly undermine established frameworks of thought. Finally, this study provides institutions with opportunities to consider strategies for the utilization, recognition and integration of individuals who are frequently overlooked or undervalued.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":43323,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Multicultural Education","volume":"291 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A doctorate doesn’t make you a “Doc”: the educational and sociocultural embodiment of culturally relevant pedagogies\",\"authors\":\"Marcus Wayne Johnson, Anthony Johnson, Langston Clark, Jonathan E. Howe, Traveon Jefferson, Dionte McClendon, Brandon Crooms, Daniel J. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jme-10-2023-0115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to stimulate scholarly attention and practical application pertaining to individuals recognized as “Docs.” Through conducting a comprehensive analysis and acquiring a profound understanding of its many connotations, the objective is to shift attitudes and approaches concerning those who are seen to possess knowledge and value within society.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>For this study, culturally relevant pedagogies were used as theoretical frameworks in addition to Sankofa and concept explication being used as methodologies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The authors identified three themes: (1) honorary cultural practice-community nomination of “professahs” and “docs,” (2) (Black) robinhoods – cultural signifiers of distinction and relatability and (3) docs as catalysts – elevating community via consciousness, trust and mentorship as significant understandings of this distinction.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The study emphasizes the importance of “Docs” in both academic and social contexts. The role of “Docs” serves to alleviate potential conflicts of being a Black intellectual. This study further reveals the ways in which Docs align with, promote or possibly undermine established frameworks of thought. Finally, this study provides institutions with opportunities to consider strategies for the utilization, recognition and integration of individuals who are frequently overlooked or undervalued.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":43323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Multicultural Education\",\"volume\":\"291 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Multicultural Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-10-2023-0115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Multicultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-10-2023-0115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在激发学术界对被公认为 "博士 "的个人的关注和实际应用。通过对 "博士 "的多种内涵进行全面分析和深刻理解,旨在转变人们对那些在社会中被视为拥有知识和价值的人的态度和方法。研究结果作者确定了三个主题:(1) 荣誉文化实践--社区对 "教授 "和 "博士 "的提名;(2) (Black) robinhoods--区别和可亲近性的文化符号;(3) 博士作为催化剂--通过意识、信任和导师关系提升社区,作为对这种区别的重要理解。博士 "的角色有助于缓解作为黑人知识分子的潜在冲突。本研究进一步揭示了 "博士 "与既定思想框架保持一致、促进或可能破坏既定思想框架的方式。最后,本研究为各机构提供了机会,以考虑利用、认可和融合经常被忽视或低估的个人的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A doctorate doesn’t make you a “Doc”: the educational and sociocultural embodiment of culturally relevant pedagogies

Purpose

This study aims to stimulate scholarly attention and practical application pertaining to individuals recognized as “Docs.” Through conducting a comprehensive analysis and acquiring a profound understanding of its many connotations, the objective is to shift attitudes and approaches concerning those who are seen to possess knowledge and value within society.

Design/methodology/approach

For this study, culturally relevant pedagogies were used as theoretical frameworks in addition to Sankofa and concept explication being used as methodologies.

Findings

The authors identified three themes: (1) honorary cultural practice-community nomination of “professahs” and “docs,” (2) (Black) robinhoods – cultural signifiers of distinction and relatability and (3) docs as catalysts – elevating community via consciousness, trust and mentorship as significant understandings of this distinction.

Originality/value

The study emphasizes the importance of “Docs” in both academic and social contexts. The role of “Docs” serves to alleviate potential conflicts of being a Black intellectual. This study further reveals the ways in which Docs align with, promote or possibly undermine established frameworks of thought. Finally, this study provides institutions with opportunities to consider strategies for the utilization, recognition and integration of individuals who are frequently overlooked or undervalued.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Multicultural Education
Journal for Multicultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal for Multicultural Education is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. Published quarterly, the editorial objectives and coverage focus on: Fostering research into the management of multicultural education, understanding multicultural education in the context of teacher-learner equity and enabling learners to collaborate more effectively across ethnic, cultural and linguistic lines. Topics covered include: -Intercultural education- Inclusive education- Urban education- Diversity in education- Ethnicity in education- Gender and education- Disability and education- Technology and Multicultural education The journal is international in coverage and publishes original, theoretical and applied articles by leading scholars, expert consultants and respected practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Fostering newly resettled refugee-background adolescents’ self-efficacy and advocacy in a community-based youth program Venezuelan migration to Brazil: teachers and students co-constructing multicultural education inside classrooms The relationship between classroom racial/ethnic composition and teacher perceptions of work conditions “I am afflicted with the evil eye!” How Islamic cultural beliefs influence college students’ perceptions of their academic experience The significance of ethnomathematics learning: a cross-cultural perspectives between Indonesian and Thailand educators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1