从阿普利亚地区(意大利)的选择实验陈述偏好有效设计中得出的风能政策启示

IF 2.8 4区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economia Politica Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1007/s40888-024-00325-2
Diana Caporale, Caterina De Lucia, Luigi dell’Olio, Pasquale Pazienza
{"title":"从阿普利亚地区(意大利)的选择实验陈述偏好有效设计中得出的风能政策启示","authors":"Diana Caporale, Caterina De Lucia, Luigi dell’Olio, Pasquale Pazienza","doi":"10.1007/s40888-024-00325-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present work argues that wind energy is either a positive or negative determinant against the risks associated with its use, and aims at: evaluating the incidence of energy risks on the perception of wind energy; analysing the trade-offs between a wind farm installation, land conservation and energy risks; suggesting adequate policy indications for the efficiency of future energy markets. The study compares the results from logit models, which estimate the distribution of the utility coefficients with a Choice Experiment approach using a stated preference efficient design and honesty priming techniques to overcome the hypothetical bias. Main findings indicate a positive attitude for the proposed wind energy scenarios in terms of <i>Aesthetical impact</i>, <i>CO</i><sub><i>2</i></sub> and <i>Bill savings</i>, and <i>Costs</i>, as well as more densely distributed wind farms producing more energy. Installation and maintenance costs and the rate of avian collisions are considered acceptable. From the main findings, useful policy insights assess the efficiency of wind farms projects to reduce costs and energy prices. Simplification of bureaucracy, direct economic benefits for local communities, citizens’ participation, and dissemination of information are key practices for future developments of wind energy markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":44858,"journal":{"name":"Economia Politica","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy insights for wind energy from a choice experiment stated preference efficient design in Apulia region (Italy)\",\"authors\":\"Diana Caporale, Caterina De Lucia, Luigi dell’Olio, Pasquale Pazienza\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40888-024-00325-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present work argues that wind energy is either a positive or negative determinant against the risks associated with its use, and aims at: evaluating the incidence of energy risks on the perception of wind energy; analysing the trade-offs between a wind farm installation, land conservation and energy risks; suggesting adequate policy indications for the efficiency of future energy markets. The study compares the results from logit models, which estimate the distribution of the utility coefficients with a Choice Experiment approach using a stated preference efficient design and honesty priming techniques to overcome the hypothetical bias. Main findings indicate a positive attitude for the proposed wind energy scenarios in terms of <i>Aesthetical impact</i>, <i>CO</i><sub><i>2</i></sub> and <i>Bill savings</i>, and <i>Costs</i>, as well as more densely distributed wind farms producing more energy. Installation and maintenance costs and the rate of avian collisions are considered acceptable. From the main findings, useful policy insights assess the efficiency of wind farms projects to reduce costs and energy prices. Simplification of bureaucracy, direct economic benefits for local communities, citizens’ participation, and dissemination of information are key practices for future developments of wind energy markets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economia Politica\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economia Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-024-00325-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-024-00325-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究认为风能对其使用风险具有积极或消极的决定作用,旨在:评估能源风险对风能认知的影响;分析风电场安装、土地保护和能源风险之间的权衡;为未来能源市场的效率提出适当的政策建议。该研究将估计效用系数分布的 logit 模型结果与使用陈述偏好有效设计和诚实引物技术来克服假设偏差的选择实验方法进行了比较。主要研究结果表明,在美学影响、二氧化碳和电费节省、成本以及分布更密集的风电场产生更多能源方面,人们对拟议的风能方案持积极态度。安装和维护成本以及鸟类碰撞率被认为是可以接受的。从主要研究结果来看,有用的政策见解评估了风电场项目降低成本和能源价格的效率。简化官僚机构、为当地社区带来直接经济效益、公民参与和信息传播是未来风能市场发展的关键做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Policy insights for wind energy from a choice experiment stated preference efficient design in Apulia region (Italy)

The present work argues that wind energy is either a positive or negative determinant against the risks associated with its use, and aims at: evaluating the incidence of energy risks on the perception of wind energy; analysing the trade-offs between a wind farm installation, land conservation and energy risks; suggesting adequate policy indications for the efficiency of future energy markets. The study compares the results from logit models, which estimate the distribution of the utility coefficients with a Choice Experiment approach using a stated preference efficient design and honesty priming techniques to overcome the hypothetical bias. Main findings indicate a positive attitude for the proposed wind energy scenarios in terms of Aesthetical impact, CO2 and Bill savings, and Costs, as well as more densely distributed wind farms producing more energy. Installation and maintenance costs and the rate of avian collisions are considered acceptable. From the main findings, useful policy insights assess the efficiency of wind farms projects to reduce costs and energy prices. Simplification of bureaucracy, direct economic benefits for local communities, citizens’ participation, and dissemination of information are key practices for future developments of wind energy markets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economia Politica
Economia Politica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: This journal publishes peer-reviewed articles that link theory and analysis in political economy, promoting a deeper understanding of economic realities and more effective courses of policy action. Established in 1984, the journal has kept pace with the times in disseminating high-quality and influential research aimed at establishing fruitful links between theories, approaches and institutions. With this relaunch (which combines Springer’s worldwide scientific scope with the Italian cultural roots of il Mulino and Fondazione Edison, whose research has been published by the two mentioned publishers for many years), the journal further reinforces its position in the European and international economic debate and scientific community. Furthermore, this move increases its pluralistic attention to the role that – at the micro, sectoral, and macro level – institutions and innovation play in the unfolding of economic change at different stages of development.
期刊最新文献
Political economy of immigration policy: direct versus indirect political influence Induced innovation, the distributive cycle, and the changing pattern of labour productivity cyclicality: an SVAR analysis for the US economy How well do couples know their partners’ preferences? Experimental evidence from joint recreation The role of tourism in reducing economic inequalities: the case of Italy Education-Job mismatch, earnings and worker’s satisfaction in African labor market: evidence from Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1