Aditya K. Gupta, Tong Wang, Shruthi Polla Ravi, Avantika Mann, Mary A. Bamimore
{"title":"甲癣在普通人群和特殊人群中的全球流行率:最新观点","authors":"Aditya K. Gupta, Tong Wang, Shruthi Polla Ravi, Avantika Mann, Mary A. Bamimore","doi":"10.1111/myc.13725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundOnychomycosis is a chronic nail disorder commonly seen by healthcare providers; toenail involvement in particular presents a treatment challenge.ObjectiveTo provide an updated estimate on the prevalence of toenail onychomycosis.MethodsWe conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Studies reporting mycology‐confirmed diagnoses were included and stratified into (a) <jats:italic>populations‐based</jats:italic> studies, and studies that included (b) <jats:italic>clinically un‐suspected</jats:italic> and (c) <jats:italic>clinically suspected</jats:italic> patients.ResultsA total of 108 studies were included. Based on studies that examined <jats:italic>clinically un‐suspected</jats:italic> patients (i.e., with or without clinical features suggestive of onychomycosis), the pooled prevalence rate of toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes was 4% (95% CI: 3–5) among the general population; special populations with a heightened risk include knee osteoarthritis patients (RR: 14.6 [95% CI: 13.0–16.5]), chronic venous disease patients (RR: 5.6 [95% CI: 3.7–8.1]), renal transplant patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 3.3–6.5]), geriatric patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.4–4.9]), HIV‐positive patients (RR: 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9–4.7]), lupus erythematosus patients (RR: 3.1 [95% CI: 1.2–6.3]), diabetic patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 2.4–3.3]) and hemodialysis patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 1.9–4.0]). The prevalence of onychomycosis in <jats:italic>clinically suspected</jats:italic> patients was significantly higher likely due to sampling bias. A high degree of variability was found in a limited number of <jats:italic>population‐based</jats:italic> studies indicating that certain pockets of the population may be more predisposed to onychomycosis. The diagnosis of non‐dermatophyte mould onychomycosis requires repeat sampling to rule out contaminants or commensal organisms; a significant difference was found between studies that performed single sampling versus repeat sampling. The advent of PCR diagnosis results in improved detection rates for dermatophytes compared to culture.ConclusionOnychomycosis is an underrecognized healthcare burden. Further <jats:italic>population‐based</jats:italic> studies using standardized PCR methods are warranted.","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global prevalence of onychomycosis in general and special populations: An updated perspective\",\"authors\":\"Aditya K. Gupta, Tong Wang, Shruthi Polla Ravi, Avantika Mann, Mary A. Bamimore\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/myc.13725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundOnychomycosis is a chronic nail disorder commonly seen by healthcare providers; toenail involvement in particular presents a treatment challenge.ObjectiveTo provide an updated estimate on the prevalence of toenail onychomycosis.MethodsWe conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Studies reporting mycology‐confirmed diagnoses were included and stratified into (a) <jats:italic>populations‐based</jats:italic> studies, and studies that included (b) <jats:italic>clinically un‐suspected</jats:italic> and (c) <jats:italic>clinically suspected</jats:italic> patients.ResultsA total of 108 studies were included. Based on studies that examined <jats:italic>clinically un‐suspected</jats:italic> patients (i.e., with or without clinical features suggestive of onychomycosis), the pooled prevalence rate of toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes was 4% (95% CI: 3–5) among the general population; special populations with a heightened risk include knee osteoarthritis patients (RR: 14.6 [95% CI: 13.0–16.5]), chronic venous disease patients (RR: 5.6 [95% CI: 3.7–8.1]), renal transplant patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 3.3–6.5]), geriatric patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.4–4.9]), HIV‐positive patients (RR: 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9–4.7]), lupus erythematosus patients (RR: 3.1 [95% CI: 1.2–6.3]), diabetic patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 2.4–3.3]) and hemodialysis patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 1.9–4.0]). The prevalence of onychomycosis in <jats:italic>clinically suspected</jats:italic> patients was significantly higher likely due to sampling bias. A high degree of variability was found in a limited number of <jats:italic>population‐based</jats:italic> studies indicating that certain pockets of the population may be more predisposed to onychomycosis. The diagnosis of non‐dermatophyte mould onychomycosis requires repeat sampling to rule out contaminants or commensal organisms; a significant difference was found between studies that performed single sampling versus repeat sampling. The advent of PCR diagnosis results in improved detection rates for dermatophytes compared to culture.ConclusionOnychomycosis is an underrecognized healthcare burden. Further <jats:italic>population‐based</jats:italic> studies using standardized PCR methods are warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mycoses\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mycoses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13725\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Global prevalence of onychomycosis in general and special populations: An updated perspective
BackgroundOnychomycosis is a chronic nail disorder commonly seen by healthcare providers; toenail involvement in particular presents a treatment challenge.ObjectiveTo provide an updated estimate on the prevalence of toenail onychomycosis.MethodsWe conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Studies reporting mycology‐confirmed diagnoses were included and stratified into (a) populations‐based studies, and studies that included (b) clinically un‐suspected and (c) clinically suspected patients.ResultsA total of 108 studies were included. Based on studies that examined clinically un‐suspected patients (i.e., with or without clinical features suggestive of onychomycosis), the pooled prevalence rate of toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes was 4% (95% CI: 3–5) among the general population; special populations with a heightened risk include knee osteoarthritis patients (RR: 14.6 [95% CI: 13.0–16.5]), chronic venous disease patients (RR: 5.6 [95% CI: 3.7–8.1]), renal transplant patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 3.3–6.5]), geriatric patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.4–4.9]), HIV‐positive patients (RR: 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9–4.7]), lupus erythematosus patients (RR: 3.1 [95% CI: 1.2–6.3]), diabetic patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 2.4–3.3]) and hemodialysis patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 1.9–4.0]). The prevalence of onychomycosis in clinically suspected patients was significantly higher likely due to sampling bias. A high degree of variability was found in a limited number of population‐based studies indicating that certain pockets of the population may be more predisposed to onychomycosis. The diagnosis of non‐dermatophyte mould onychomycosis requires repeat sampling to rule out contaminants or commensal organisms; a significant difference was found between studies that performed single sampling versus repeat sampling. The advent of PCR diagnosis results in improved detection rates for dermatophytes compared to culture.ConclusionOnychomycosis is an underrecognized healthcare burden. Further population‐based studies using standardized PCR methods are warranted.
期刊介绍:
The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi.
Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.