夫妻关系治疗中的关系破坏

IF 1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1007/s10591-024-09702-2
William J. Doherty, Steven M. Harris, Kadija Mussa
{"title":"夫妻关系治疗中的关系破坏","authors":"William J. Doherty, Steven M. Harris, Kadija Mussa","doi":"10.1007/s10591-024-09702-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examined the prevalence of relationship undermining statements by therapists treating couples, as reported by clients, and the association of these statements with outcomes. Participants (n = 270) reported on recollections of their therapist saying that they were incompatible, that therapist could not help them, that the relationship was beyond repair, that divorce was the best or most realistic option, or told one of partners that the other had a personality problem, or proposed individual therapy instead ofcouple therapy. Findings showed a prevalence rate of 10-28% across these fiveundermining statements; 40% of clients reported at least one statement. Undermining statements were associated with poorer outcomes and shorter duration of coupletherapy. We suggest that some therapists treating couples lack a systemic/relationship framework and set of skills, which leads them to become frustrated and pessimisticwith difficult couple cases. We offer implications for the training of couple therapists.</p>","PeriodicalId":51600,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Undermining in Couple Therapy\",\"authors\":\"William J. Doherty, Steven M. Harris, Kadija Mussa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10591-024-09702-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We examined the prevalence of relationship undermining statements by therapists treating couples, as reported by clients, and the association of these statements with outcomes. Participants (n = 270) reported on recollections of their therapist saying that they were incompatible, that therapist could not help them, that the relationship was beyond repair, that divorce was the best or most realistic option, or told one of partners that the other had a personality problem, or proposed individual therapy instead ofcouple therapy. Findings showed a prevalence rate of 10-28% across these fiveundermining statements; 40% of clients reported at least one statement. Undermining statements were associated with poorer outcomes and shorter duration of coupletherapy. We suggest that some therapists treating couples lack a systemic/relationship framework and set of skills, which leads them to become frustrated and pessimisticwith difficult couple cases. We offer implications for the training of couple therapists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-024-09702-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-024-09702-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了客户报告的治疗师在治疗夫妻关系时说的破坏夫妻关系的话的普遍程度,以及这些话与治疗结果的关联。参与者(n = 270)回忆了他们的治疗师曾说过的一些话:他们不相容、治疗师帮不了他们、夫妻关系无法修复、离婚是最好或最现实的选择、告诉伴侣中的一方另一方有人格问题、建议进行个人治疗而不是夫妻治疗。调查结果显示,这五种破坏性言论的流行率为 10%-28%;40% 的客户报告至少有一种言论。破坏性陈述与较差的治疗效果和较短的夫妻治疗时间有关。我们认为,一些治疗师在治疗情侣时缺乏系统性/关系框架和一整套技能,这导致他们对困难的情侣案例感到沮丧和悲观。我们提出了对夫妻治疗师培训的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship Undermining in Couple Therapy

We examined the prevalence of relationship undermining statements by therapists treating couples, as reported by clients, and the association of these statements with outcomes. Participants (n = 270) reported on recollections of their therapist saying that they were incompatible, that therapist could not help them, that the relationship was beyond repair, that divorce was the best or most realistic option, or told one of partners that the other had a personality problem, or proposed individual therapy instead ofcouple therapy. Findings showed a prevalence rate of 10-28% across these fiveundermining statements; 40% of clients reported at least one statement. Undermining statements were associated with poorer outcomes and shorter duration of coupletherapy. We suggest that some therapists treating couples lack a systemic/relationship framework and set of skills, which leads them to become frustrated and pessimisticwith difficult couple cases. We offer implications for the training of couple therapists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY
CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal (COFT) is is a quarterly, peer-reviewed publication that presents the latest developments in research, practice, theory, and training in couple and family therapy. COFT publishes applied and basic research with implications for systemic theory, treatment, and policy. COFT appreciates a multidisciplinary approach, and welcomes manuscripts which address processes and outcomes in systemic treatment across modalities and within broader social contexts. The journal’s content is relevant to systemic therapy practitioners and researchers, as well as marriage and family therapists, family psychologists, clinical social workers, and social policy specialists.
期刊最新文献
Family Members’ Reward-Based Activation in Response to an AUD Love-One Clinical Work with Female Torture Survivors: An Exploration of Service Providers’ Views Towards Culturally Sensitive Care: Addressing Challenges in Asian and Asian American Mental Health Services Black Girl Magic: Strength, Resiliency, and Suffering? A Qualitative Exploration of Toxic Black Femininity and Intimate Partner Violence Surface of Marital Harmony: Insights into Attachment Similarity Using Dyadic Response Surface Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1