{"title":"从 PID 到 ADRC,再到 ADRC:将基于误差的主动干扰抑制控制方案表述为标准工业 1DOF 和 2DOF 控制器","authors":"Momir Stankovic, He Ting, Rafal Madonski","doi":"10.1002/asjc.3373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we uncover a new connection between standard proportional-integral (PI), proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC), from which we establish formal conditions of equivalence between the two control schemes. Using the equivalence, we devise a step-by-step procedure of transitioning from PI/PID to error-based ADRC. We also show how to go from one degree-of-freedom (1DOF) to two degree-of-freedom (2DOF) ADRC while retaining a standard 2DOF PI/PID structure. Both procedures facilitate expressing error-based ADRC schemes as standard industrial 1DOF and 2DOF controllers. This allows the designed controller to have the desired characteristic of ADRC (i.e., strong robustness against internal and external uncertainties) while still being expressed in a form that is familiar to industrial practitioners, where PI/PID structures are still the workhorse of modern control systems. The paper's results ensure backward compatibility of future ADRC-based solutions and foster the adoption of active disturbance rejection-based methods in industrial practice as a viable alternative to standard controllers. To further support the findings, a set of tests is conducted in time and frequency domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":55453,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Control","volume":"26 6","pages":"2796-2806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From PID to ADRC and back: Expressing error-based active disturbance rejection control schemes as standard industrial 1DOF and 2DOF controllers\",\"authors\":\"Momir Stankovic, He Ting, Rafal Madonski\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/asjc.3373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this paper, we uncover a new connection between standard proportional-integral (PI), proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC), from which we establish formal conditions of equivalence between the two control schemes. Using the equivalence, we devise a step-by-step procedure of transitioning from PI/PID to error-based ADRC. We also show how to go from one degree-of-freedom (1DOF) to two degree-of-freedom (2DOF) ADRC while retaining a standard 2DOF PI/PID structure. Both procedures facilitate expressing error-based ADRC schemes as standard industrial 1DOF and 2DOF controllers. This allows the designed controller to have the desired characteristic of ADRC (i.e., strong robustness against internal and external uncertainties) while still being expressed in a form that is familiar to industrial practitioners, where PI/PID structures are still the workhorse of modern control systems. The paper's results ensure backward compatibility of future ADRC-based solutions and foster the adoption of active disturbance rejection-based methods in industrial practice as a viable alternative to standard controllers. To further support the findings, a set of tests is conducted in time and frequency domain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Control\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"2796-2806\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asjc.3373\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asjc.3373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
From PID to ADRC and back: Expressing error-based active disturbance rejection control schemes as standard industrial 1DOF and 2DOF controllers
In this paper, we uncover a new connection between standard proportional-integral (PI), proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC), from which we establish formal conditions of equivalence between the two control schemes. Using the equivalence, we devise a step-by-step procedure of transitioning from PI/PID to error-based ADRC. We also show how to go from one degree-of-freedom (1DOF) to two degree-of-freedom (2DOF) ADRC while retaining a standard 2DOF PI/PID structure. Both procedures facilitate expressing error-based ADRC schemes as standard industrial 1DOF and 2DOF controllers. This allows the designed controller to have the desired characteristic of ADRC (i.e., strong robustness against internal and external uncertainties) while still being expressed in a form that is familiar to industrial practitioners, where PI/PID structures are still the workhorse of modern control systems. The paper's results ensure backward compatibility of future ADRC-based solutions and foster the adoption of active disturbance rejection-based methods in industrial practice as a viable alternative to standard controllers. To further support the findings, a set of tests is conducted in time and frequency domain.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Control, an Asian Control Association (ACA) and Chinese Automatic Control Society (CACS) affiliated journal, is the first international journal originating from the Asia Pacific region. The Asian Journal of Control publishes papers on original theoretical and practical research and developments in the areas of control, involving all facets of control theory and its application.
Published six times a year, the Journal aims to be a key platform for control communities throughout the world.
The Journal provides a forum where control researchers and practitioners can exchange knowledge and experiences on the latest advances in the control areas, and plays an educational role for students and experienced researchers in other disciplines interested in this continually growing field. The scope of the journal is extensive.
Topics include:
The theory and design of control systems and components, encompassing:
Robust and distributed control using geometric, optimal, stochastic and nonlinear methods
Game theory and state estimation
Adaptive control, including neural networks, learning, parameter estimation
and system fault detection
Artificial intelligence, fuzzy and expert systems
Hierarchical and man-machine systems
All parts of systems engineering which consider the reliability of components and systems
Emerging application areas, such as:
Robotics
Mechatronics
Computers for computer-aided design, manufacturing, and control of
various industrial processes
Space vehicles and aircraft, ships, and traffic
Biomedical systems
National economies
Power systems
Agriculture
Natural resources.