Zdenek Sulc, Jaroslav Hornicek, Hana Rezankova, Jana Cibulkova
{"title":"分类数据分层聚类的内部评价标准比较","authors":"Zdenek Sulc, Jaroslav Hornicek, Hana Rezankova, Jana Cibulkova","doi":"10.1007/s11634-024-00592-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper discusses eleven internal evaluation criteria that can be used in the area of hierarchical clustering of categorical data. The criteria are divided into two distinct groups based on how they treat the cluster quality: variability- and distance-based. The paper follows three main aims. The first one is to compare the examined criteria regarding their mutual similarity and dependence on the clustered datasets’ properties and the used similarity measures. The second one is to analyze the relationships between internal and external cluster evaluation to determine how well the internal criteria can recognize the original number of clusters in datasets and to what extent they provide comparable results to the external criteria. The third aim is to propose two new variability-based internal evaluation criteria. In the experiment, 81 types of generated datasets with controlled properties are used. The results show which internal criteria can be recommended for specific tasks, such as judging the cluster quality or the optimal number of clusters determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":49270,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of internal evaluation criteria in hierarchical clustering of categorical data\",\"authors\":\"Zdenek Sulc, Jaroslav Hornicek, Hana Rezankova, Jana Cibulkova\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11634-024-00592-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The paper discusses eleven internal evaluation criteria that can be used in the area of hierarchical clustering of categorical data. The criteria are divided into two distinct groups based on how they treat the cluster quality: variability- and distance-based. The paper follows three main aims. The first one is to compare the examined criteria regarding their mutual similarity and dependence on the clustered datasets’ properties and the used similarity measures. The second one is to analyze the relationships between internal and external cluster evaluation to determine how well the internal criteria can recognize the original number of clusters in datasets and to what extent they provide comparable results to the external criteria. The third aim is to propose two new variability-based internal evaluation criteria. In the experiment, 81 types of generated datasets with controlled properties are used. The results show which internal criteria can be recommended for specific tasks, such as judging the cluster quality or the optimal number of clusters determination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-024-00592-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-024-00592-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of internal evaluation criteria in hierarchical clustering of categorical data
The paper discusses eleven internal evaluation criteria that can be used in the area of hierarchical clustering of categorical data. The criteria are divided into two distinct groups based on how they treat the cluster quality: variability- and distance-based. The paper follows three main aims. The first one is to compare the examined criteria regarding their mutual similarity and dependence on the clustered datasets’ properties and the used similarity measures. The second one is to analyze the relationships between internal and external cluster evaluation to determine how well the internal criteria can recognize the original number of clusters in datasets and to what extent they provide comparable results to the external criteria. The third aim is to propose two new variability-based internal evaluation criteria. In the experiment, 81 types of generated datasets with controlled properties are used. The results show which internal criteria can be recommended for specific tasks, such as judging the cluster quality or the optimal number of clusters determination.
期刊介绍:
The international journal Advances in Data Analysis and Classification (ADAC) is designed as a forum for high standard publications on research and applications concerning the extraction of knowable aspects from many types of data. It publishes articles on such topics as structural, quantitative, or statistical approaches for the analysis of data; advances in classification, clustering, and pattern recognition methods; strategies for modeling complex data and mining large data sets; methods for the extraction of knowledge from data, and applications of advanced methods in specific domains of practice. Articles illustrate how new domain-specific knowledge can be made available from data by skillful use of data analysis methods. The journal also publishes survey papers that outline, and illuminate the basic ideas and techniques of special approaches.