Simulated cost‐effectiveness of a novel precision‐guided dosing strategy in adult patients with Crohn's disease initiating infliximab maintenance therapy

BackgroundPatients with Crohn's disease (CD) who lose response to biologics experience reduced quality of life (QoL) and costly hospitalizations. Precision‐guided dosing (PGD) provides a comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) profile that allows for biologic dosing to be personalized. We analyzed the cost‐effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) PGD relative to two other dose intensification strategies (DIS).MethodsWe developed a hybrid (Markov and decision tree) model of patients with CD who had a clinical response to IFX induction. The analysis had a US payer perspective, a base case time horizon of 5 years, and a 4‐week cycle length. There were three IFX dosing comparators: PGD; dose intensification based on symptoms, inflammatory markers, and trough IFX concentration (DIS1); and dose intensification based on symptoms alone (DIS2). Patients that failed IFX initiated ustekinumab, followed by vedolizumab, and conventional therapy. Transition probabilities for IFX were estimated from real‐world clinical PK data and interventional clinical trial patient‐level data. All other transition probabilities were derived from published randomized clinical trials and cost‐effectiveness analyses. Utility values were sourced from previous health technology assessments. Direct costs included biologic acquisition and infusion, surgeries and procedures, conventional therapy, and lab testing. The primary outcomes were incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The robustness of results was assessed via one‐way sensitivity, scenario, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).ResultsPGD was the cost‐effective IFX dosing strategy with an ICER of 122,932 $ per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) relative to DIS1 and dominating DIS2. PGD had the lowest percentage (1.1%) of patients requiring a new biologic through 5 years (8.9% and 74.4% for DIS1 and DIS2, respectively). One‐way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the cost‐effectiveness of PGD was most sensitive to the time between IFX doses. PSA demonstrated that joint parameter uncertainty had moderate impact on some results.ConclusionsPGD provides clinical and QoL benefits by maintaining remission and avoiding IFX failure; it is the most cost‐effective under conservative assumptions.