Mathew Edung Etabo, Pablo Lacerda Ribeiro, Britta Pitann, Karl Hermann Mühling
{"title":"锰和磷的浓度受硝化抑制剂驱动的根瘤层酸化的不同影响","authors":"Mathew Edung Etabo, Pablo Lacerda Ribeiro, Britta Pitann, Karl Hermann Mühling","doi":"10.1111/sum.13054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High soil pH can lead to Mn<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> and P deficiency and yield losses. In addition, it is unclear which process, nitrification‐induced acidification of bulk soil or nitrification inhibitor‐driven rhizosphere acidification, is more effective in increasing Mn<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> availability and shoot concentration. Thus, this topic was investigated in this study. Moreover, we also evaluated if applying NIs can avoid P deficiency in soil with high pH and high buffering capacity. Two greenhouse experiments were carried out to investigate the impact of applying 3,4‐Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) in sandy soil subjected to the application of different lime rates, simulating several soil pH and buffering capacity conditions. The utilized lime rates were 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 g CaCO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. The measured variables were bulk and rhizosphere soil pH, Mn<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> and P availability, maize biomass production, as well as Mn and P shoot concentrations. DMPP significantly reduced shoot biomass by 10% in unlimed soil; however, it promoted the overall shoot biomass by 30% in limed soil in both experiments. In addition, DMPP decreased the overall Mn shoot concentration by 24 and 21% in experiments I and II, respectively. In contrast, DMPP increased the overall P shoot concentration due to rhizosphere acidification by 24 and 17% in experiments I and II, respectively. The DMPP application did not avoid P deficiency under the highest lime rate (4 g CaCO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) despite alleviating it. In conclusion, the application of NIs is not beneficial for increasing Mn<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> shoot concentration and, when performed to increase P availability in high pH soils, should consider the likelihood of causing Mn deficiency.","PeriodicalId":21759,"journal":{"name":"Soil Use and Management","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manganese and phosphorus maize shoot concentrations are differently affected by nitrification inhibitor‐driven rhizosphere acidification\",\"authors\":\"Mathew Edung Etabo, Pablo Lacerda Ribeiro, Britta Pitann, Karl Hermann Mühling\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sum.13054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High soil pH can lead to Mn<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> and P deficiency and yield losses. In addition, it is unclear which process, nitrification‐induced acidification of bulk soil or nitrification inhibitor‐driven rhizosphere acidification, is more effective in increasing Mn<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> availability and shoot concentration. Thus, this topic was investigated in this study. Moreover, we also evaluated if applying NIs can avoid P deficiency in soil with high pH and high buffering capacity. Two greenhouse experiments were carried out to investigate the impact of applying 3,4‐Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) in sandy soil subjected to the application of different lime rates, simulating several soil pH and buffering capacity conditions. The utilized lime rates were 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 g CaCO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. The measured variables were bulk and rhizosphere soil pH, Mn<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> and P availability, maize biomass production, as well as Mn and P shoot concentrations. DMPP significantly reduced shoot biomass by 10% in unlimed soil; however, it promoted the overall shoot biomass by 30% in limed soil in both experiments. In addition, DMPP decreased the overall Mn shoot concentration by 24 and 21% in experiments I and II, respectively. In contrast, DMPP increased the overall P shoot concentration due to rhizosphere acidification by 24 and 17% in experiments I and II, respectively. The DMPP application did not avoid P deficiency under the highest lime rate (4 g CaCO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) despite alleviating it. In conclusion, the application of NIs is not beneficial for increasing Mn<jats:sup>2+</jats:sup> shoot concentration and, when performed to increase P availability in high pH soils, should consider the likelihood of causing Mn deficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Use and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
土壤 pH 值过高会导致 Mn2+ 和 P 缺乏,造成产量损失。此外,目前还不清楚硝化诱导的大体积土壤酸化和硝化抑制剂驱动的根瘤层酸化哪个过程更能有效提高 Mn2+ 的可用性和芽的浓度。因此,本研究对这一主题进行了调查。此外,我们还评估了在 pH 值高、缓冲能力强的土壤中施用硝化抑制剂能否避免缺磷。我们进行了两次温室实验,模拟几种土壤 pH 值和缓冲能力条件,研究在施用不同石灰率的沙质土壤中施用 3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP)的影响。使用的石灰率分别为 0、0.5、1、2 和 4 g CaCO3 kg-1。测量的变量包括土壤容重和根瘤土壤 pH 值、Mn2+ 和 P 的可用性、玉米生物量产量以及锰和 P 的芽浓度。在两个实验中,DMPP 都使未施肥土壤中的嫩枝生物量明显减少了 10%;但在施肥土壤中,DMPP 使整个嫩枝生物量增加了 30%。此外,在实验 I 和 II 中,DMPP 使锰的总体芽浓度分别降低了 24% 和 21%。与此相反,在实验 I 和 II 中,由于根圈酸化,DMPP 使芽的总磷浓度分别增加了 24% 和 17%。在施用最高石灰率(4 g CaCO3 kg-1)的情况下,施用 DMPP 尽管缓解了缺钾症,但并没有避免缺钾症。总之,施用 NIs 无益于提高 Mn2+ 的芽浓度,在高 pH 值土壤中施用 NIs 以提高钾的可用性时,应考虑导致缺锰的可能性。
Manganese and phosphorus maize shoot concentrations are differently affected by nitrification inhibitor‐driven rhizosphere acidification
High soil pH can lead to Mn2+ and P deficiency and yield losses. In addition, it is unclear which process, nitrification‐induced acidification of bulk soil or nitrification inhibitor‐driven rhizosphere acidification, is more effective in increasing Mn2+ availability and shoot concentration. Thus, this topic was investigated in this study. Moreover, we also evaluated if applying NIs can avoid P deficiency in soil with high pH and high buffering capacity. Two greenhouse experiments were carried out to investigate the impact of applying 3,4‐Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) in sandy soil subjected to the application of different lime rates, simulating several soil pH and buffering capacity conditions. The utilized lime rates were 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 g CaCO3 kg−1. The measured variables were bulk and rhizosphere soil pH, Mn2+ and P availability, maize biomass production, as well as Mn and P shoot concentrations. DMPP significantly reduced shoot biomass by 10% in unlimed soil; however, it promoted the overall shoot biomass by 30% in limed soil in both experiments. In addition, DMPP decreased the overall Mn shoot concentration by 24 and 21% in experiments I and II, respectively. In contrast, DMPP increased the overall P shoot concentration due to rhizosphere acidification by 24 and 17% in experiments I and II, respectively. The DMPP application did not avoid P deficiency under the highest lime rate (4 g CaCO3 kg−1) despite alleviating it. In conclusion, the application of NIs is not beneficial for increasing Mn2+ shoot concentration and, when performed to increase P availability in high pH soils, should consider the likelihood of causing Mn deficiency.
期刊介绍:
Soil Use and Management publishes in soil science, earth and environmental science, agricultural science, and engineering fields. The submitted papers should consider the underlying mechanisms governing the natural and anthropogenic processes which affect soil systems, and should inform policy makers and/or practitioners on the sustainable use and management of soil resources. Interdisciplinary studies, e.g. linking soil with climate change, biodiversity, global health, and the UN’s sustainable development goals, with strong novelty, wide implications, and unexpected outcomes are welcomed.