Maodan Chen, Yang Huang, Juyi Hu, Longfei Jia, Yuanzhou Wu, Jing Feng, Fuwei Zhang, Jian Tong, Qunqing Chen, Hui Li
{"title":"剑突下视频辅助胸腔镜手术中膈肌损伤的风险因素","authors":"Maodan Chen, Yang Huang, Juyi Hu, Longfei Jia, Yuanzhou Wu, Jing Feng, Fuwei Zhang, Jian Tong, Qunqing Chen, Hui Li","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10789-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered a safe and feasible operation for anterior mediastinal mass resection. However, diaphragmatic injury, presented as tearing or puncturing, may occur during subxiphoid VATS despite of low incidence. This study aims to explore risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid VATS, as well as strategies to reduce occurrence of the injury.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 44 consecutive adult patients who underwent subxiphoid VATS. These patients were divided into two groups: diaphragmatic injury group and non-injury group. Perioperative outcomes and anatomic features derived from 3D CT reconstructions were compared between the two groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Significant differences were observed in operation time (223.25 ± 92.57 vs. 136.28 ± 53.05, <i>P</i> = 0.006), xiphoid length (6.47 ± 0.85 vs. 4.79 ± 1.04, <i>P</i> = 0.001) and length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm (24.86 ± 12.02 vs. 14.61 ± 9.25, <i>P</i> = 0.029). Odds ratio for the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm was 1.09 (1.001–1.186), <i>P</i> = 0.048 by binary logistic regression analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>We identified the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm as an independent risk factor for diaphragm injury during subxiphoid VATS. Prior to subxiphoid VATS, a 3D chest CT reconstruction is recommended to assess the patients’ anatomic variations within the xiphoid process. For patients with longer xiphoid process, a higher incision at the middle and upper part of the xiphoid process, and partial xiphoid process resection or xiphoidectomy is preferred.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Maodan Chen, Yang Huang, Juyi Hu, Longfei Jia, Yuanzhou Wu, Jing Feng, Fuwei Zhang, Jian Tong, Qunqing Chen, Hui Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-024-10789-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered a safe and feasible operation for anterior mediastinal mass resection. However, diaphragmatic injury, presented as tearing or puncturing, may occur during subxiphoid VATS despite of low incidence. This study aims to explore risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid VATS, as well as strategies to reduce occurrence of the injury.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 44 consecutive adult patients who underwent subxiphoid VATS. These patients were divided into two groups: diaphragmatic injury group and non-injury group. Perioperative outcomes and anatomic features derived from 3D CT reconstructions were compared between the two groups.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Significant differences were observed in operation time (223.25 ± 92.57 vs. 136.28 ± 53.05, <i>P</i> = 0.006), xiphoid length (6.47 ± 0.85 vs. 4.79 ± 1.04, <i>P</i> = 0.001) and length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm (24.86 ± 12.02 vs. 14.61 ± 9.25, <i>P</i> = 0.029). Odds ratio for the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm was 1.09 (1.001–1.186), <i>P</i> = 0.048 by binary logistic regression analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>We identified the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm as an independent risk factor for diaphragm injury during subxiphoid VATS. Prior to subxiphoid VATS, a 3D chest CT reconstruction is recommended to assess the patients’ anatomic variations within the xiphoid process. For patients with longer xiphoid process, a higher incision at the middle and upper part of the xiphoid process, and partial xiphoid process resection or xiphoidectomy is preferred.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":501625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10789-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10789-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景剑突下视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)被认为是一种安全可行的前纵隔肿块切除手术。然而,尽管剑突下 VATS 的发生率较低,但仍可能发生膈肌损伤(表现为撕裂或穿刺)。本研究旨在探讨剑突下 VATS 中膈肌损伤的风险因素,以及减少损伤发生的策略。这些患者被分为两组:膈肌损伤组和非损伤组。结果观察到两组患者的手术时间存在显著差异(223.25 ± 92.57 vs. 136.28 ± 53.05,P = 0.006)。05, P = 0.006)、剑突长度(6.47 ± 0.85 vs. 4.79 ± 1.04, P = 0.001)和剑突在膈肌附着点以下的长度(24.86 ± 12.02 vs. 14.61 ± 9.25, P = 0.029)存在显著差异。通过二元逻辑回归分析,剑突长度低于膈肌附着点的风险比为 1.09 (1.001-1.186),P = 0.048。结论我们发现剑突长度低于膈肌附着点是剑突下 VATS 期间膈肌损伤的独立风险因素。建议在剑突下 VATS 手术前进行三维胸部 CT 重建,以评估患者剑突内的解剖结构变化。对于剑突较长的患者,最好在剑突的中上部做一个较高的切口,并进行剑突部分切除或剑突切除术。
Risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Background
Subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered a safe and feasible operation for anterior mediastinal mass resection. However, diaphragmatic injury, presented as tearing or puncturing, may occur during subxiphoid VATS despite of low incidence. This study aims to explore risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid VATS, as well as strategies to reduce occurrence of the injury.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 44 consecutive adult patients who underwent subxiphoid VATS. These patients were divided into two groups: diaphragmatic injury group and non-injury group. Perioperative outcomes and anatomic features derived from 3D CT reconstructions were compared between the two groups.
Results
Significant differences were observed in operation time (223.25 ± 92.57 vs. 136.28 ± 53.05, P = 0.006), xiphoid length (6.47 ± 0.85 vs. 4.79 ± 1.04, P = 0.001) and length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm (24.86 ± 12.02 vs. 14.61 ± 9.25, P = 0.029). Odds ratio for the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm was 1.09 (1.001–1.186), P = 0.048 by binary logistic regression analysis.
Conclusions
We identified the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm as an independent risk factor for diaphragm injury during subxiphoid VATS. Prior to subxiphoid VATS, a 3D chest CT reconstruction is recommended to assess the patients’ anatomic variations within the xiphoid process. For patients with longer xiphoid process, a higher incision at the middle and upper part of the xiphoid process, and partial xiphoid process resection or xiphoidectomy is preferred.