阻力训练并非徒劳:对心力衰竭患者进行阻力训练的益处、机制和安全性的系统回顾

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Failure Reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1007/s10741-024-10402-0
Bradley A. Morris, Ronak Sinaei, Neil A. Smart
{"title":"阻力训练并非徒劳:对心力衰竭患者进行阻力训练的益处、机制和安全性的系统回顾","authors":"Bradley A. Morris, Ronak Sinaei, Neil A. Smart","doi":"10.1007/s10741-024-10402-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Exercise offers many physical and health benefits to people with heart failure (CHF), but aerobic training (AT) predominates published literature. Resistance training (RT) provides additional and complementary health benefits to AT in people with CHF; we aimed to elucidate specific health benefits accrued, the mechanism of effect and safety of RT. We conducted a systematic search for RT randomised, controlled trials in people with CHF, up until August 30, 2023. RT offers several benefits including improved physical function (peak VO<sub>2</sub> and 6MWD), quality of life, cardiac systolic and diastolic function, endothelial blood vessel function, muscle strength, anti-inflammatory muscle markers, appetite and serious event rates. RT is beneficial and improves peak VO<sub>2</sub> and 6MWD, partly restores normal muscle fibre profile and decreases inflammation. In turn this leads to a reduced risk or impact of sarcopenia/cachexia via effect on appetite. The positive impact on quality of life and performance of activities of daily living is related to improved function, which in turn improves prognosis. RT appears to be safe with only one serious event reported and no deaths. Nevertheless, few events reported to date limit robust analysis. RT appears to be safe and offers health benefits to people with CHF. RT modifies the adverse muscle phenotype profile present in people with CHF and it appears safe. Starting slowly with RT and increasing load to 80% of 1 repetition maximum (RM) appears to offer optimal benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resistance is not futile: a systematic review of the benefits, mechanisms and safety of resistance training in people with heart failure\",\"authors\":\"Bradley A. Morris, Ronak Sinaei, Neil A. Smart\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10741-024-10402-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Exercise offers many physical and health benefits to people with heart failure (CHF), but aerobic training (AT) predominates published literature. Resistance training (RT) provides additional and complementary health benefits to AT in people with CHF; we aimed to elucidate specific health benefits accrued, the mechanism of effect and safety of RT. We conducted a systematic search for RT randomised, controlled trials in people with CHF, up until August 30, 2023. RT offers several benefits including improved physical function (peak VO<sub>2</sub> and 6MWD), quality of life, cardiac systolic and diastolic function, endothelial blood vessel function, muscle strength, anti-inflammatory muscle markers, appetite and serious event rates. RT is beneficial and improves peak VO<sub>2</sub> and 6MWD, partly restores normal muscle fibre profile and decreases inflammation. In turn this leads to a reduced risk or impact of sarcopenia/cachexia via effect on appetite. The positive impact on quality of life and performance of activities of daily living is related to improved function, which in turn improves prognosis. RT appears to be safe with only one serious event reported and no deaths. Nevertheless, few events reported to date limit robust analysis. RT appears to be safe and offers health benefits to people with CHF. RT modifies the adverse muscle phenotype profile present in people with CHF and it appears safe. Starting slowly with RT and increasing load to 80% of 1 repetition maximum (RM) appears to offer optimal benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-024-10402-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-024-10402-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动对心力衰竭(CHF)患者的身体和健康有很多益处,但有氧训练(AT)在已发表的文献中占主导地位。阻力训练(RT)对心力衰竭患者的健康有额外的补充益处;我们旨在阐明阻力训练对健康的具体益处、作用机制和安全性。我们对截至 2023 年 8 月 30 日的针对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的 RT 随机对照试验进行了系统检索。RT具有多种益处,包括改善身体功能(VO2峰值和6MWD)、生活质量、心脏收缩和舒张功能、血管内皮功能、肌肉力量、抗炎肌肉标志物、食欲和严重事件发生率。RT 有益于提高峰值 VO2 和 6MWD 值,部分恢复正常的肌肉纤维轮廓并减少炎症。这反过来又通过对食欲的影响,降低了肌肉疏松症/骨质疏松症的风险或影响。对生活质量和日常生活能力的积极影响与功能的改善有关,而功能的改善反过来又会改善预后。RT 似乎是安全的,仅有一例严重事件报告,无死亡病例。然而,迄今为止报告的事件很少,限制了可靠的分析。RT 似乎是安全的,并能为慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者带来健康益处。RT 可改变慢性阻塞性肺病患者的不良肌肉表型,而且似乎是安全的。从缓慢开始进行 RT,然后将负荷增加到最大重复次数(RM)的 80%,似乎能带来最佳益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resistance is not futile: a systematic review of the benefits, mechanisms and safety of resistance training in people with heart failure

Exercise offers many physical and health benefits to people with heart failure (CHF), but aerobic training (AT) predominates published literature. Resistance training (RT) provides additional and complementary health benefits to AT in people with CHF; we aimed to elucidate specific health benefits accrued, the mechanism of effect and safety of RT. We conducted a systematic search for RT randomised, controlled trials in people with CHF, up until August 30, 2023. RT offers several benefits including improved physical function (peak VO2 and 6MWD), quality of life, cardiac systolic and diastolic function, endothelial blood vessel function, muscle strength, anti-inflammatory muscle markers, appetite and serious event rates. RT is beneficial and improves peak VO2 and 6MWD, partly restores normal muscle fibre profile and decreases inflammation. In turn this leads to a reduced risk or impact of sarcopenia/cachexia via effect on appetite. The positive impact on quality of life and performance of activities of daily living is related to improved function, which in turn improves prognosis. RT appears to be safe with only one serious event reported and no deaths. Nevertheless, few events reported to date limit robust analysis. RT appears to be safe and offers health benefits to people with CHF. RT modifies the adverse muscle phenotype profile present in people with CHF and it appears safe. Starting slowly with RT and increasing load to 80% of 1 repetition maximum (RM) appears to offer optimal benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Reviews 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology. The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.
期刊最新文献
Could SGLT2 inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and significant valvular heart disease? Need for action. Maternal heart failure: state-of-the-art review. Diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: European vs. American guidelines. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in left ventricular assist device and heart transplant recipients: a mini-review. The road to renal denervation for hypertension and beyond (HF): two decades of failed, succeeded, and to be determined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1