追求哪个想法?创意构思选择过程中回避新奇事物的性别差异

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Organization Science Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1287/orsc.2022.16176
Mengzi Jin, Roy Chua
{"title":"追求哪个想法?创意构思选择过程中回避新奇事物的性别差异","authors":"Mengzi Jin, Roy Chua","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2022.16176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite women having made significant progress in the modern workforce, gender gaps are still evident in creative work. In this paper, we propose that, although women and men are equally capable of generating creative ideas, gender differences emerge during the idea-selection stage. Specifically, compared with men, women engage in higher novelty avoidance during idea selection—the degree to which one selects an idea that is less novel than the most novel idea one has generated. In two laboratory studies and a field survey involving creative professionals, we found significant gender differences in novelty avoidance during idea selection and identified women’s concerns about social backlash when pursuing highly novel ideas as one explanatory variable. We also experimentally manipulated gender compositions of the evaluation panel and found that women’s novelty avoidance tendency during idea selection was reduced when they were informed about the presence of women evaluators. Finally, novelty avoidance during idea selection has an inverted U-shaped relationship with idea success; because women tend to engage in higher novelty avoidance than men, novelty avoidance in women (but not men) has a negative impact on the success of their ideas. By examining gender dynamics at specific stages, our work offers theoretical and practical insights regarding gender disparities in creative work.</p><p><b>Funding:</b> M. Jin extends appreciation to the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72202003, 72091314, 72172006] for financial support. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the Singapore Ministry of Education’s Social Science Research Thematic Grant [Grant MOE2017-SSRTG-042].</p><p><b>Supplemental Material:</b> The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16176.</p>","PeriodicalId":48462,"journal":{"name":"Organization Science","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Idea to Pursue? Gender Differences in Novelty Avoidance During Creative Idea Selection\",\"authors\":\"Mengzi Jin, Roy Chua\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/orsc.2022.16176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite women having made significant progress in the modern workforce, gender gaps are still evident in creative work. In this paper, we propose that, although women and men are equally capable of generating creative ideas, gender differences emerge during the idea-selection stage. Specifically, compared with men, women engage in higher novelty avoidance during idea selection—the degree to which one selects an idea that is less novel than the most novel idea one has generated. In two laboratory studies and a field survey involving creative professionals, we found significant gender differences in novelty avoidance during idea selection and identified women’s concerns about social backlash when pursuing highly novel ideas as one explanatory variable. We also experimentally manipulated gender compositions of the evaluation panel and found that women’s novelty avoidance tendency during idea selection was reduced when they were informed about the presence of women evaluators. Finally, novelty avoidance during idea selection has an inverted U-shaped relationship with idea success; because women tend to engage in higher novelty avoidance than men, novelty avoidance in women (but not men) has a negative impact on the success of their ideas. By examining gender dynamics at specific stages, our work offers theoretical and practical insights regarding gender disparities in creative work.</p><p><b>Funding:</b> M. Jin extends appreciation to the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72202003, 72091314, 72172006] for financial support. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the Singapore Ministry of Education’s Social Science Research Thematic Grant [Grant MOE2017-SSRTG-042].</p><p><b>Supplemental Material:</b> The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16176.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization Science\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16176\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管女性在现代劳动力中取得了长足的进步,但在创意工作中,性别差距依然明显。在本文中,我们提出,尽管女性和男性同样能够产生创意,但在创意选择阶段却出现了性别差异。具体地说,与男性相比,女性在创意选择过程中的新颖性规避程度更高--即选择的创意不如自己产生的最新颖的创意新颖的程度。在两项实验室研究和一项涉及创意专业人士的实地调查中,我们发现在创意选择过程中,女性在回避新颖性方面存在显著的性别差异,并将女性在追求高新颖性创意时对社会反弹的担忧作为一个解释变量。我们还通过实验操纵了评估小组的性别构成,结果发现,当女性被告知有女性评估员在场时,她们在创意选择过程中的新奇规避倾向就会降低。最后,创意选择过程中的新奇回避与创意成功与否呈倒 U 型关系;由于女性的新奇回避倾向高于男性,女性(而非男性)的新奇回避会对其创意的成功与否产生负面影响。通过研究特定阶段的性别动态,我们的研究为创造性工作中的性别差异提供了理论和实践启示:M. Jin 感谢国家自然科学基金[72202003, 72091314, 72172006]的资助。作者还感谢新加坡教育部社会科学研究专题资助[Grant MOE2017-SSRTG-042]:在线附录见 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16176。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Which Idea to Pursue? Gender Differences in Novelty Avoidance During Creative Idea Selection

Despite women having made significant progress in the modern workforce, gender gaps are still evident in creative work. In this paper, we propose that, although women and men are equally capable of generating creative ideas, gender differences emerge during the idea-selection stage. Specifically, compared with men, women engage in higher novelty avoidance during idea selection—the degree to which one selects an idea that is less novel than the most novel idea one has generated. In two laboratory studies and a field survey involving creative professionals, we found significant gender differences in novelty avoidance during idea selection and identified women’s concerns about social backlash when pursuing highly novel ideas as one explanatory variable. We also experimentally manipulated gender compositions of the evaluation panel and found that women’s novelty avoidance tendency during idea selection was reduced when they were informed about the presence of women evaluators. Finally, novelty avoidance during idea selection has an inverted U-shaped relationship with idea success; because women tend to engage in higher novelty avoidance than men, novelty avoidance in women (but not men) has a negative impact on the success of their ideas. By examining gender dynamics at specific stages, our work offers theoretical and practical insights regarding gender disparities in creative work.

Funding: M. Jin extends appreciation to the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72202003, 72091314, 72172006] for financial support. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the Singapore Ministry of Education’s Social Science Research Thematic Grant [Grant MOE2017-SSRTG-042].

Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16176.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organization Science
Organization Science MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
166
期刊介绍: Organization Science is ranked among the top journals in management by the Social Science Citation Index in terms of impact and is widely recognized in the fields of strategy, management, and organization theory. Organization Science provides one umbrella for the publication of research from all over the world in fields such as organization theory, strategic management, sociology, economics, political science, history, information science, communication theory, and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Can You Go Home Again? Performance Assistance Between Boomerangs and Incumbent Employees Cautious Exploitation: Learning and Search in Problems of Evaluation and Discovery Embrace the Unexpected: How Organizations Foster Participatory Improvisation with Customers Temporal Miscoupling: The Challenges and Consequences of Enacting a Practice in Decline Mavericks and Diplomats: Bridging Commercial and Institutional Entrepreneurship for Society’s Grand Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1