就以人为本的团队合作的定义和属性达成共识:电子德尔菲研究

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1111/wvn.12724
Alida Viljoen, Ronell Leech, Paul Slater, Tanya Heyns
{"title":"就以人为本的团队合作的定义和属性达成共识:电子德尔菲研究","authors":"Alida Viljoen, Ronell Leech, Paul Slater, Tanya Heyns","doi":"10.1111/wvn.12724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundEffective health care relies on person‐centeredness and teamwork, which are known to improve outcomes. These two concepts have been defined individually, but we could not find a definition of the combined concept. A preliminary definition was developed through a concept analysis; however, consensus on the concept has not been reached.AimThe aim of this study was to reach consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork.MethodsA consensus design allowed experts to collaborate and share their experience and wisdom to refine and reach consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork. An e‐Delphi was used to engage the experts.ResultsThree rounds of online engagement with 12 experts were needed to reach consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork. The attributes reached consensus of 82% after the first round. The definition had 82% consensus after the three rounds. The definition had been adjusted and refined according to the expert input. The newly adjusted definition was established.Linking Evidence to ActionWe successfully used the e‐Delphi method to obtain consensus on the attributes and definition of person‐centered teamwork. The definition of person‐centered teamwork can be further developed and included in clinical practice to guide improved clinical outcomes. The consensus definition of person‐centered teamwork provides a clear understanding of the meaning thereof, which may in turn enrich the usability thereof in clinical practice. Person‐centered teams improve outcomes for persons receiving care in hospitals. Building person‐centered teams are now better understood and the foundation of building these teams defined. We engaged with 12 experts in the academic and clinical field of person‐centeredness and teamwork. The use and value of the Delphi method to obtain consensus is now better understood and can assist future research development.","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork: An e‐Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"Alida Viljoen, Ronell Leech, Paul Slater, Tanya Heyns\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/wvn.12724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundEffective health care relies on person‐centeredness and teamwork, which are known to improve outcomes. These two concepts have been defined individually, but we could not find a definition of the combined concept. A preliminary definition was developed through a concept analysis; however, consensus on the concept has not been reached.AimThe aim of this study was to reach consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork.MethodsA consensus design allowed experts to collaborate and share their experience and wisdom to refine and reach consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork. An e‐Delphi was used to engage the experts.ResultsThree rounds of online engagement with 12 experts were needed to reach consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork. The attributes reached consensus of 82% after the first round. The definition had 82% consensus after the three rounds. The definition had been adjusted and refined according to the expert input. The newly adjusted definition was established.Linking Evidence to ActionWe successfully used the e‐Delphi method to obtain consensus on the attributes and definition of person‐centered teamwork. The definition of person‐centered teamwork can be further developed and included in clinical practice to guide improved clinical outcomes. The consensus definition of person‐centered teamwork provides a clear understanding of the meaning thereof, which may in turn enrich the usability thereof in clinical practice. Person‐centered teams improve outcomes for persons receiving care in hospitals. Building person‐centered teams are now better understood and the foundation of building these teams defined. We engaged with 12 experts in the academic and clinical field of person‐centeredness and teamwork. The use and value of the Delphi method to obtain consensus is now better understood and can assist future research development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12724\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12724","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景有效的医疗保健依赖于 "以人为本 "和 "团队合作",众所周知,这两个概念可以改善医疗效果。这两个概念已被单独定义,但我们还没有找到关于这两个概念的综合定义。本研究的目的是就 "以人为本的团队合作 "的定义和属性达成共识。方法 通过共识设计,专家们可以合作并分享他们的经验和智慧,以完善 "以人为本的团队合作 "的定义和属性并达成共识。结果需要与 12 位专家进行三轮在线交流,才能就 "以人为本的团队工作 "的定义和属性达成共识。第一轮之后,82%的专家就团队合作的属性达成了共识。定义在三轮讨论后达成了 82% 的共识。根据专家意见,对定义进行了调整和完善。我们成功地使用了 e-Delphi 方法,就以人为本的团队工作的属性和定义达成了共识。以人为本的团队合作定义可以进一步发展并纳入临床实践,以指导改善临床结果。以人为本的团队合作的共识定义使人们对其内涵有了清晰的认识,进而可以丰富其在临床实践中的可用性。以人为本的团队可以改善在医院接受治疗的患者的治疗效果。现在,人们对建立以人为本的团队有了更好的理解,并明确了建立这些团队的基础。我们与以人为本和团队合作方面的 12 位学术和临床专家进行了交流。德尔菲法在达成共识方面的应用和价值现在得到了更好的理解,并有助于未来的研究发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork: An e‐Delphi study
BackgroundEffective health care relies on person‐centeredness and teamwork, which are known to improve outcomes. These two concepts have been defined individually, but we could not find a definition of the combined concept. A preliminary definition was developed through a concept analysis; however, consensus on the concept has not been reached.AimThe aim of this study was to reach consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork.MethodsA consensus design allowed experts to collaborate and share their experience and wisdom to refine and reach consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork. An e‐Delphi was used to engage the experts.ResultsThree rounds of online engagement with 12 experts were needed to reach consensus on the definition and attributes of person‐centered teamwork. The attributes reached consensus of 82% after the first round. The definition had 82% consensus after the three rounds. The definition had been adjusted and refined according to the expert input. The newly adjusted definition was established.Linking Evidence to ActionWe successfully used the e‐Delphi method to obtain consensus on the attributes and definition of person‐centered teamwork. The definition of person‐centered teamwork can be further developed and included in clinical practice to guide improved clinical outcomes. The consensus definition of person‐centered teamwork provides a clear understanding of the meaning thereof, which may in turn enrich the usability thereof in clinical practice. Person‐centered teams improve outcomes for persons receiving care in hospitals. Building person‐centered teams are now better understood and the foundation of building these teams defined. We engaged with 12 experts in the academic and clinical field of person‐centeredness and teamwork. The use and value of the Delphi method to obtain consensus is now better understood and can assist future research development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for: Clinicians Researchers Nurse leaders Managers Administrators Educators Policymakers Worldviews on Evidence­-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring: Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a Nurse-Led Support Program Using Mobile Application Versus Nurse Phone Advice on Patients at Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Efficacy of Supportive Care Interventions for Improving Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Resilience in Family Caregivers of Cancer-Affected Children: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Effectiveness of meaning-centered interventions on existential distress and mental health outcomes in cancer survivors and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Comparing the effectiveness of peer-led healthy aging interventions on depression and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Effects of theory-guided unsupervised exercise on depression, sleep quality, and sense of control in pregnant women: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1