优化计量效率:二维 DIC 滤波方法比较分析

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Experimental Techniques Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1007/s40799-024-00708-x
T. Fourest
{"title":"优化计量效率:二维 DIC 滤波方法比较分析","authors":"T. Fourest","doi":"10.1007/s40799-024-00708-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital Images Correlation (DIC) measures are widely used in order to calibrate models. It is very common for researchers to use filters on these measurements to improve the measurement resolution (decrease the noise level) before using them with various methodologies. However, the effects of these filters on the tradeoff between spatial resolution and measurement resolution are not fully understood. The objective of the study is to compare seven common denoising/filtering methods for 2D DIC with affine subset shape function, including image filters (Gaussian, Median), frequency filters (Lowpass Butterworth, Holoborodko), local polynomial fitting (Savitzky-Golay filter, cubic splines), and Finite Elements mapping. The proposed methodology to compare the enhancement of these methods is based on the star pattern test cases used in the DIC Challenge 2.0. Hence, this study aims to obtain a general comparison of the filtering methods as opposed to case-dependent approaches. To that end, firstly, the FOLKI-D DIC code is metrologically qualified using the DIC Challenge 2.0 methodology and test cases. Then, the filtering methods are applied to the displacements and strain maps computed with the FOLKI-D code for various DIC subset sizes and filter parameters. It is found that displacement and strain map enhancements vary significantly depending on the filter. Some methods show no improvement (or worsened tradeoff in the strain case), while others achieve similar resolution tradeoffs as DIC codes using quadratic subset shape functions. Finally, it is concluded that the filter choice significantly impacts results, with higher-order lowpass Butterworth, Savitzky-Golay, and Finite Elements mapping methods showing preference over others studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":553,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Metrological Efficiency: Comparative Analysis of Filtering Methods for 2D DIC\",\"authors\":\"T. Fourest\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40799-024-00708-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Digital Images Correlation (DIC) measures are widely used in order to calibrate models. It is very common for researchers to use filters on these measurements to improve the measurement resolution (decrease the noise level) before using them with various methodologies. However, the effects of these filters on the tradeoff between spatial resolution and measurement resolution are not fully understood. The objective of the study is to compare seven common denoising/filtering methods for 2D DIC with affine subset shape function, including image filters (Gaussian, Median), frequency filters (Lowpass Butterworth, Holoborodko), local polynomial fitting (Savitzky-Golay filter, cubic splines), and Finite Elements mapping. The proposed methodology to compare the enhancement of these methods is based on the star pattern test cases used in the DIC Challenge 2.0. Hence, this study aims to obtain a general comparison of the filtering methods as opposed to case-dependent approaches. To that end, firstly, the FOLKI-D DIC code is metrologically qualified using the DIC Challenge 2.0 methodology and test cases. Then, the filtering methods are applied to the displacements and strain maps computed with the FOLKI-D code for various DIC subset sizes and filter parameters. It is found that displacement and strain map enhancements vary significantly depending on the filter. Some methods show no improvement (or worsened tradeoff in the strain case), while others achieve similar resolution tradeoffs as DIC codes using quadratic subset shape functions. Finally, it is concluded that the filter choice significantly impacts results, with higher-order lowpass Butterworth, Savitzky-Golay, and Finite Elements mapping methods showing preference over others studied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Techniques\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-024-00708-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-024-00708-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字图像相关性(DIC)测量被广泛用于校准模型。研究人员通常会对这些测量结果使用滤波器,以提高测量分辨率(降低噪音水平),然后再将其用于各种方法。然而,这些滤波器对空间分辨率和测量分辨率之间权衡的影响尚未得到充分了解。本研究的目的是比较七种常见的去噪/滤波方法,用于具有仿射子集形状函数的二维 DIC,包括图像滤波器(高斯滤波器、中值滤波器)、频率滤波器(低通巴特沃斯滤波器、Holoborodko 滤波器)、局部多项式拟合(Savitzky-Golay 滤波器、立方样条)和有限元映射。为比较这些方法的增强效果而提出的方法是基于 DIC Challenge 2.0 中使用的星形模式测试案例。因此,本研究的目的是对滤波方法进行总体比较,而不是采用依赖于案例的方法。为此,首先使用 DIC Challenge 2.0 方法和测试案例对 FOLKI-D DIC 代码进行计量鉴定。然后,针对不同的 DIC 子集大小和滤波参数,将滤波方法应用于 FOLKI-D 代码计算的位移和应变图。结果发现,滤波方法不同,位移和应变图的增强效果也大不相同。一些方法没有任何改进(或在应变情况下折衷效果更差),而另一些方法则实现了与使用二次子集形状函数的 DIC 代码类似的分辨率折衷效果。最后,得出的结论是,滤波器的选择会对结果产生重大影响,高阶低通 Butterworth、Savitzky-Golay 和有限元映射方法比其他方法更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Metrological Efficiency: Comparative Analysis of Filtering Methods for 2D DIC

Digital Images Correlation (DIC) measures are widely used in order to calibrate models. It is very common for researchers to use filters on these measurements to improve the measurement resolution (decrease the noise level) before using them with various methodologies. However, the effects of these filters on the tradeoff between spatial resolution and measurement resolution are not fully understood. The objective of the study is to compare seven common denoising/filtering methods for 2D DIC with affine subset shape function, including image filters (Gaussian, Median), frequency filters (Lowpass Butterworth, Holoborodko), local polynomial fitting (Savitzky-Golay filter, cubic splines), and Finite Elements mapping. The proposed methodology to compare the enhancement of these methods is based on the star pattern test cases used in the DIC Challenge 2.0. Hence, this study aims to obtain a general comparison of the filtering methods as opposed to case-dependent approaches. To that end, firstly, the FOLKI-D DIC code is metrologically qualified using the DIC Challenge 2.0 methodology and test cases. Then, the filtering methods are applied to the displacements and strain maps computed with the FOLKI-D code for various DIC subset sizes and filter parameters. It is found that displacement and strain map enhancements vary significantly depending on the filter. Some methods show no improvement (or worsened tradeoff in the strain case), while others achieve similar resolution tradeoffs as DIC codes using quadratic subset shape functions. Finally, it is concluded that the filter choice significantly impacts results, with higher-order lowpass Butterworth, Savitzky-Golay, and Finite Elements mapping methods showing preference over others studied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Techniques
Experimental Techniques 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
88
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Techniques is a bimonthly interdisciplinary publication of the Society for Experimental Mechanics focusing on the development, application and tutorial of experimental mechanics techniques. The purpose for Experimental Techniques is to promote pedagogical, technical and practical advancements in experimental mechanics while supporting the Society''s mission and commitment to interdisciplinary application, research and development, education, and active promotion of experimental methods to: - Increase the knowledge of physical phenomena - Further the understanding of the behavior of materials, structures, and systems - Provide the necessary physical observations necessary to improve and assess new analytical and computational approaches.
期刊最新文献
Vertical Projectile Launcher for Study of Rapid Penetration into Soil Targets A Novel Approach to Measure the Chip Formation Temperature Using the Implanted Thermocouple Method Coefficient of Friction Between Pant Fabrics and Seat Covers: An In-Vivo Experimental Study Performance Analysis and Control of a Low-Frequency Vibration Generator for Accelerometer Calibration Loading Conditions Effects on Fatigue Life of Notched Rods Using Four-Point Bending Test
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1