婴幼儿的因果学习:从计算理论到语言实践

Samantha Basch, Su‐hua Wang
{"title":"婴幼儿的因果学习:从计算理论到语言实践","authors":"Samantha Basch, Su‐hua Wang","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Causal reasoning—the ability to reason about causal relations between events—is fundamental to understanding how the world works. This paper reviews two prominent theories on early causal learning and offers possibilities for theory bridging. Both theories grow out of computational modeling and have significant areas of overlap while differing in several respects. Explanation‐Based Learning (EBL) focuses on young infants' learning about causal concepts of physical objects and events, whereas Bayesian models have been used to describe causal reasoning beyond infancy across various concept domains. Connecting the two models offers a more integrated approach to clarifying the developmental processes in causal reasoning from early infancy through later childhood. We further suggest that everyday language practices offer a promising space for theory bridging. We provide a review of selective work on caregiver–child conversations, in particular, on the use of scaffolding language including causal talk and pedagogical questions. Linking the research on language practices to the two cognitive theories, we point out directions for further research to integrate EBL and Bayesian models and clarify how causal learning unfolds in real life.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>Psychology &gt; Learning</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Cognitive Biology &gt; Cognitive Development</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501132,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Cognitive Science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal learning by infants and young children: From computational theories to language practices\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Basch, Su‐hua Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wcs.1678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Causal reasoning—the ability to reason about causal relations between events—is fundamental to understanding how the world works. This paper reviews two prominent theories on early causal learning and offers possibilities for theory bridging. Both theories grow out of computational modeling and have significant areas of overlap while differing in several respects. Explanation‐Based Learning (EBL) focuses on young infants' learning about causal concepts of physical objects and events, whereas Bayesian models have been used to describe causal reasoning beyond infancy across various concept domains. Connecting the two models offers a more integrated approach to clarifying the developmental processes in causal reasoning from early infancy through later childhood. We further suggest that everyday language practices offer a promising space for theory bridging. We provide a review of selective work on caregiver–child conversations, in particular, on the use of scaffolding language including causal talk and pedagogical questions. Linking the research on language practices to the two cognitive theories, we point out directions for further research to integrate EBL and Bayesian models and clarify how causal learning unfolds in real life.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\\\"simple\\\"> <jats:list-item>Psychology &gt; Learning</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Cognitive Biology &gt; Cognitive Development</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs Cognitive Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs Cognitive Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因果推理--推理事件之间因果关系的能力--是理解世界如何运作的基础。本文回顾了关于早期因果学习的两种著名理论,并提出了理论衔接的可能性。这两种理论都源于计算建模,在一些方面存在差异的同时,也有很大的重叠之处。基于解释的学习(EBL)侧重于幼儿对物理对象和事件的因果概念的学习,而贝叶斯模型则被用于描述婴儿期之后不同概念领域的因果推理。将这两种模型联系起来,可以提供一种更加综合的方法来阐明从婴儿早期到儿童后期的因果推理发展过程。我们还认为,日常语言实践为理论衔接提供了一个前景广阔的空间。我们有选择性地回顾了有关照料者与儿童对话的研究,特别是有关使用支架语言(包括因果对话和教学问题)的研究。将语言实践研究与两种认知理论联系起来,我们指出了进一步研究的方向,以整合 EBL 和贝叶斯模型,并阐明因果学习在现实生活中是如何展开的:心理学 > 学习 认知生物学 > 认知发展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causal learning by infants and young children: From computational theories to language practices
Causal reasoning—the ability to reason about causal relations between events—is fundamental to understanding how the world works. This paper reviews two prominent theories on early causal learning and offers possibilities for theory bridging. Both theories grow out of computational modeling and have significant areas of overlap while differing in several respects. Explanation‐Based Learning (EBL) focuses on young infants' learning about causal concepts of physical objects and events, whereas Bayesian models have been used to describe causal reasoning beyond infancy across various concept domains. Connecting the two models offers a more integrated approach to clarifying the developmental processes in causal reasoning from early infancy through later childhood. We further suggest that everyday language practices offer a promising space for theory bridging. We provide a review of selective work on caregiver–child conversations, in particular, on the use of scaffolding language including causal talk and pedagogical questions. Linking the research on language practices to the two cognitive theories, we point out directions for further research to integrate EBL and Bayesian models and clarify how causal learning unfolds in real life.This article is categorized under: Psychology > Learning Cognitive Biology > Cognitive Development
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The strategic allocation theory of vigilance Local brain abnormalities in emotional disorders: Evidence from resting state fMRI studies Children's anthropomorphism of inanimate agents Comparing cognition across major transitions using the hierarchy of formal automata Computation for cognitive science: Analog versus digital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1