SHAPEv1.0 动态土壤健康指标的评分曲线和同类基准

Márcio R. Nunes, Kristen S. Veum, Paul A. Parker, Scott H. Holan, Joseph P. Amsili, Harold M. van Es, Skye A. Wills, Cathy A. Seybold, Douglas L. Karlen
{"title":"SHAPEv1.0 动态土壤健康指标的评分曲线和同类基准","authors":"Márcio R. Nunes,&nbsp;Kristen S. Veum,&nbsp;Paul A. Parker,&nbsp;Scott H. Holan,&nbsp;Joseph P. Amsili,&nbsp;Harold M. van Es,&nbsp;Skye A. Wills,&nbsp;Cathy A. Seybold,&nbsp;Douglas L. Karlen","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The soil health concept has evolved over the past several decades, recognizing that the response of dynamic soil properties to management is dependent on site-specific factors. The Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) tool provides scores and benchmark values by forming soil peer groups based on site-specific, climate-edaphic characteristics. Data for model development were compiled from the Cornell Soil Health Laboratory and the Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory databases. The SHAPEv1.0 interpretation curves produce scores between 0% and 100% for measured laboratory values that reflect the quantile within a population conditional cumulative distribution function along with measures of uncertainty. The original SHAPE tool was developed for soil organic carbon and has been expanded to include two wet aggregate stability methods, permanganate oxidizable organic carbon, autoclaved citrate extractable protein, and 4-day microbial respiration. In addition, SHAPE provides site-specific benchmark values at user-defined percentiles within a given soil peer group. The difference between the actual measured value and the selected benchmark value represents the soil health opportunity gap. Case studies in Missouri and Texas show that the SHAPE scoring curves are sensitive to land-use and management practices across multiple soil types and provide a regionally relevant interpretation of key soil health indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20668","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SHAPEv1.0 Scoring curves and peer group benchmarks for dynamic soil health indicators\",\"authors\":\"Márcio R. Nunes,&nbsp;Kristen S. Veum,&nbsp;Paul A. Parker,&nbsp;Scott H. Holan,&nbsp;Joseph P. Amsili,&nbsp;Harold M. van Es,&nbsp;Skye A. Wills,&nbsp;Cathy A. Seybold,&nbsp;Douglas L. Karlen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The soil health concept has evolved over the past several decades, recognizing that the response of dynamic soil properties to management is dependent on site-specific factors. The Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) tool provides scores and benchmark values by forming soil peer groups based on site-specific, climate-edaphic characteristics. Data for model development were compiled from the Cornell Soil Health Laboratory and the Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory databases. The SHAPEv1.0 interpretation curves produce scores between 0% and 100% for measured laboratory values that reflect the quantile within a population conditional cumulative distribution function along with measures of uncertainty. The original SHAPE tool was developed for soil organic carbon and has been expanded to include two wet aggregate stability methods, permanganate oxidizable organic carbon, autoclaved citrate extractable protein, and 4-day microbial respiration. In addition, SHAPE provides site-specific benchmark values at user-defined percentiles within a given soil peer group. The difference between the actual measured value and the selected benchmark value represents the soil health opportunity gap. Case studies in Missouri and Texas show that the SHAPE scoring curves are sensitive to land-use and management practices across multiple soil types and provide a regionally relevant interpretation of key soil health indicators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20668\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去几十年来,土壤健康概念不断发展,认识到动态土壤特性对管理的反应取决于具体地点的因素。土壤健康评估协议和评价(SHAPE)工具根据具体地点的气候-地形特征形成土壤同类组,从而提供分数和基准值。用于模型开发的数据来自康奈尔土壤健康实验室和凯洛格土壤调查实验室的数据库。SHAPEv1.0 解释曲线可为实验室测量值生成 0% 至 100% 的分数,这些分数反映了群体条件累积分布函数中的量级以及不确定性度量。最初的 SHAPE 工具是针对土壤有机碳开发的,现已扩展到两种湿集料稳定性方法、高锰酸盐可氧化有机碳、高压灭菌柠檬酸盐可提取蛋白质和 4 天微生物呼吸。此外,SHAPE 还可在给定的土壤同类组中,按用户定义的百分位数提供特定地点的基准值。实际测量值与所选基准值之间的差值即为土壤健康机会差距。密苏里州和德克萨斯州的案例研究表明,SHAPE 评分曲线对多种土壤类型中的土地利用和管理方法非常敏感,并提供了与地区相关的关键土壤健康指标解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SHAPEv1.0 Scoring curves and peer group benchmarks for dynamic soil health indicators

The soil health concept has evolved over the past several decades, recognizing that the response of dynamic soil properties to management is dependent on site-specific factors. The Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) tool provides scores and benchmark values by forming soil peer groups based on site-specific, climate-edaphic characteristics. Data for model development were compiled from the Cornell Soil Health Laboratory and the Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory databases. The SHAPEv1.0 interpretation curves produce scores between 0% and 100% for measured laboratory values that reflect the quantile within a population conditional cumulative distribution function along with measures of uncertainty. The original SHAPE tool was developed for soil organic carbon and has been expanded to include two wet aggregate stability methods, permanganate oxidizable organic carbon, autoclaved citrate extractable protein, and 4-day microbial respiration. In addition, SHAPE provides site-specific benchmark values at user-defined percentiles within a given soil peer group. The difference between the actual measured value and the selected benchmark value represents the soil health opportunity gap. Case studies in Missouri and Texas show that the SHAPE scoring curves are sensitive to land-use and management practices across multiple soil types and provide a regionally relevant interpretation of key soil health indicators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Proceedings of the 14th North American Forest Soils Conference Soil chemical properties affecting grain yield and oil content of crambe biofuel crop Particulate organic carbon and nitrogen and soil-test biological activity under grazed pastures and conservation land uses Determining microbial metabolic limitation under the influence of moss patch size from soil extracellular enzyme stoichiometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1