综合统计噪声水平并应用于风电场指南

IF 1.7 4区 物理与天体物理 Acoustics Australia Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1007/s40857-024-00318-y
Renzo Tonin
{"title":"综合统计噪声水平并应用于风电场指南","authors":"Renzo Tonin","doi":"10.1007/s40857-024-00318-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is stated in wind farm standards that logarithmic addition and subtraction of <i>L</i><sub>AF90<i>,T</i></sub> sound pressure levels is “not strictly mathematically correct”. An analytical and experimental study reported in Tonin 2024 (a related article) examines the underlying accuracy of combining statistical noise levels as a general proposition, particularly the <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> and the <i>L</i><sub>AF10,<i>T</i></sub>. The objective of that study was to explore the accuracy of combining statistical noise levels and what might influence that accuracy. The objective of this study, as foreshadowed in Tonin 2024, is to apply the results to wind farms. It was concluded in Tonin 2024 that values of <i>D</i><sub>90</sub> (being the difference between the logarithmic sum and actual values of <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub>) are negative in the range 0 to − 3 dB (for the cases in the study), meaning that the logarithmic sum of <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> for the ambient and source sound pressure level distributions is less than the actual value of <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> for the combined distribution. As a result, in deriving the wind farm noise level (as a contribution), the actual value of <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> will be less than that determined by logarithmic subtraction of the individual components. In respect of the question of the underlying accuracy of combining statistical noise levels for wind farms, it is concluded that the difference between the logarithmic addition of the <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> and the true value is less than 1 dB (for the cases in the study). The results are applied herein to a typical wind farm concluding that the simple energy subtraction method adopted in wind farm guidelines is conservative even allowing for the hypothesis that the fluctuation strength of wind farm noise is not invariant but increases with distance. It is also concluded that if wind farm guidelines were to assess wind farm noise on the basis of <i>L</i><sub>Aeq,<i>T</i></sub> rather than <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> then adding a value of 2.5 dB to the derived wind farm noise level <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> as currently specified in the guidelines (i.e., with <i>D</i><sub>90</sub> = 0 dB) would be conservative even allowing for the hypothesis that the fluctuation strength of wind farm noise is not invariant but increases with distance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54355,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics Australia","volume":"52 2","pages":"263 - 272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Statistical Noise Levels and Application to Wind Farm Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Renzo Tonin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40857-024-00318-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It is stated in wind farm standards that logarithmic addition and subtraction of <i>L</i><sub>AF90<i>,T</i></sub> sound pressure levels is “not strictly mathematically correct”. An analytical and experimental study reported in Tonin 2024 (a related article) examines the underlying accuracy of combining statistical noise levels as a general proposition, particularly the <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> and the <i>L</i><sub>AF10,<i>T</i></sub>. The objective of that study was to explore the accuracy of combining statistical noise levels and what might influence that accuracy. The objective of this study, as foreshadowed in Tonin 2024, is to apply the results to wind farms. It was concluded in Tonin 2024 that values of <i>D</i><sub>90</sub> (being the difference between the logarithmic sum and actual values of <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub>) are negative in the range 0 to − 3 dB (for the cases in the study), meaning that the logarithmic sum of <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> for the ambient and source sound pressure level distributions is less than the actual value of <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> for the combined distribution. As a result, in deriving the wind farm noise level (as a contribution), the actual value of <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> will be less than that determined by logarithmic subtraction of the individual components. In respect of the question of the underlying accuracy of combining statistical noise levels for wind farms, it is concluded that the difference between the logarithmic addition of the <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> and the true value is less than 1 dB (for the cases in the study). The results are applied herein to a typical wind farm concluding that the simple energy subtraction method adopted in wind farm guidelines is conservative even allowing for the hypothesis that the fluctuation strength of wind farm noise is not invariant but increases with distance. It is also concluded that if wind farm guidelines were to assess wind farm noise on the basis of <i>L</i><sub>Aeq,<i>T</i></sub> rather than <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> then adding a value of 2.5 dB to the derived wind farm noise level <i>L</i><sub>AF90,<i>T</i></sub> as currently specified in the guidelines (i.e., with <i>D</i><sub>90</sub> = 0 dB) would be conservative even allowing for the hypothesis that the fluctuation strength of wind farm noise is not invariant but increases with distance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acoustics Australia\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"263 - 272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acoustics Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40857-024-00318-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics Australia","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40857-024-00318-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风电场标准中规定,LAF90,T 声压级的对数加减法 "严格来说在数学上是不正确的"。Tonin 2024(相关文章)中报告的一项分析和实验研究考察了作为一般命题的统计噪声级组合的基本准确性,特别是 LAF90T 和 LAF10T。该研究的目的是探索统计噪声级组合的准确性以及可能影响准确性的因素。正如 Tonin 2024 所预示的,本研究的目的是将结果应用于风电场。Tonin 2024 中得出的结论是,D90 值(即 LAF90,T 的对数和与实际值之差)在 0 到 - 3 dB 范围内为负值(针对研究中的案例),这意味着环境声压级分布和声源声压级分布的 LAF90,T 对数和小于合并分布的 LAF90,T 实际值。因此,在得出风电场噪声级(作为贡献值)时,LAF90,T 的实际值将小于按对数减去各个组成部分后确定的值。关于风电场噪声水平统计组合的基本准确性问题,结论是 LAF90,T 的对数加法与真实值之间的差异小于 1 分贝(就研究中的案例而言)。本文将结果应用于一个典型的风电场,得出的结论是,即使考虑到风电场噪声的波动强度不是不变的,而是随着距离的增加而增加这一假设,风电场指南中采用的简单能量减法也是保守的。此外还得出结论,如果风电场指南是根据 LAeq,T 而不是 LAF90,T 来评估风电场噪声,那么即使考虑到风电场噪声的波动强度不是不变的,而是随距离增加而增加的假设,在指南中目前规定的风电场噪声级 LAF90,T 的基础上增加 2.5 dB 值(即 D90 = 0 dB)也是保守的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combining Statistical Noise Levels and Application to Wind Farm Guidelines

It is stated in wind farm standards that logarithmic addition and subtraction of LAF90,T sound pressure levels is “not strictly mathematically correct”. An analytical and experimental study reported in Tonin 2024 (a related article) examines the underlying accuracy of combining statistical noise levels as a general proposition, particularly the LAF90,T and the LAF10,T. The objective of that study was to explore the accuracy of combining statistical noise levels and what might influence that accuracy. The objective of this study, as foreshadowed in Tonin 2024, is to apply the results to wind farms. It was concluded in Tonin 2024 that values of D90 (being the difference between the logarithmic sum and actual values of LAF90,T) are negative in the range 0 to − 3 dB (for the cases in the study), meaning that the logarithmic sum of LAF90,T for the ambient and source sound pressure level distributions is less than the actual value of LAF90,T for the combined distribution. As a result, in deriving the wind farm noise level (as a contribution), the actual value of LAF90,T will be less than that determined by logarithmic subtraction of the individual components. In respect of the question of the underlying accuracy of combining statistical noise levels for wind farms, it is concluded that the difference between the logarithmic addition of the LAF90,T and the true value is less than 1 dB (for the cases in the study). The results are applied herein to a typical wind farm concluding that the simple energy subtraction method adopted in wind farm guidelines is conservative even allowing for the hypothesis that the fluctuation strength of wind farm noise is not invariant but increases with distance. It is also concluded that if wind farm guidelines were to assess wind farm noise on the basis of LAeq,T rather than LAF90,T then adding a value of 2.5 dB to the derived wind farm noise level LAF90,T as currently specified in the guidelines (i.e., with D90 = 0 dB) would be conservative even allowing for the hypothesis that the fluctuation strength of wind farm noise is not invariant but increases with distance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acoustics Australia
Acoustics Australia ACOUSTICS-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Acoustics Australia, the journal of the Australian Acoustical Society, has been publishing high quality research and technical papers in all areas of acoustics since commencement in 1972. The target audience for the journal includes both researchers and practitioners. It aims to publish papers and technical notes that are relevant to current acoustics and of interest to members of the Society. These include but are not limited to: Architectural and Building Acoustics, Environmental Noise, Underwater Acoustics, Engineering Noise and Vibration Control, Occupational Noise Management, Hearing, Musical Acoustics.
期刊最新文献
News Item Experimental Assessment of the Flow Recirculation Effect on the Noise Measurement of a Free-Flying Multi-rotor UAS in a Closed Anechoic Chamber Source Depth Discrimination Based on Interference Spectrum in Deep Water with an Incomplete Channel The Increasing Application of DIN 4150-3 for the Assessment of Potential Damage to Buildings from Construction Vibration and its Implications in Australia Towards an Acoustically Accessible Campus: A Case Study of the Acoustic Conditions of an Australian University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1