审查 BA 诉国王案：家 "能否提供免受家庭暴力的安全感？

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW Alternative Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1177/1037969x241237015

Bill Swannie

{"title":"审查 BA 诉国王案：家 \"能否提供免受家庭暴力的安全感？","authors":"Bill Swannie","doi":"10.1177/1037969x241237015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the High Court decision in BA v The King, which involved the relationship between tenancy law and the criminal offence of burglary. It argues that the Court should have given greater weight to the safety of victims of domestic violence, rather than privileging the rights of the accused under tenancy law.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining BA v The King: Can a ‘home’ provide security from domestic violence?\",\"authors\":\"Bill Swannie\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969x241237015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the High Court decision in BA v The King, which involved the relationship between tenancy law and the criminal offence of burglary. It argues that the Court should have given greater weight to the safety of victims of domestic violence, rather than privileging the rights of the accused under tenancy law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241237015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241237015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了高等法院在 BA v The King 一案中的判决，该案涉及租赁法与入室盗窃刑事犯罪之间的关系。文章认为，法院本应更加重视家庭暴力受害者的安全，而不是优先考虑被告在租赁法下的权利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Examining BA v The King: Can a ‘home’ provide security from domestic violence?

This article examines the High Court decision in BA v The King, which involved the relationship between tenancy law and the criminal offence of burglary. It argues that the Court should have given greater weight to the safety of victims of domestic violence, rather than privileging the rights of the accused under tenancy law.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Alternative Law Journal LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量