多视图叠加中的视图选择:选择元学习器

IF 1.4 4区 计算机科学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Advances in Data Analysis and Classification Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s11634-024-00587-5
Wouter van Loon, Marjolein Fokkema, Botond Szabo, Mark de Rooij
{"title":"多视图叠加中的视图选择:选择元学习器","authors":"Wouter van Loon, Marjolein Fokkema, Botond Szabo, Mark de Rooij","doi":"10.1007/s11634-024-00587-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multi-view stacking is a framework for combining information from different views (i.e. different feature sets) describing the same set of objects. In this framework, a <i>base-learner</i> algorithm is trained on each view separately, and their predictions are then combined by a <i>meta-learner</i> algorithm. In a previous study, stacked penalized logistic regression, a special case of multi-view stacking, has been shown to be useful in identifying which views are most important for prediction. In this article we expand this research by considering seven different algorithms to use as the meta-learner, and evaluating their view selection and classification performance in simulations and two applications on real gene-expression data sets. Our results suggest that if both view selection and classification accuracy are important to the research at hand, then the nonnegative lasso, nonnegative adaptive lasso and nonnegative elastic net are suitable meta-learners. Exactly which among these three is to be preferred depends on the research context. The remaining four meta-learners, namely nonnegative ridge regression, nonnegative forward selection, stability selection and the interpolating predictor, show little advantages in order to be preferred over the other three.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":49270,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"View selection in multi-view stacking: choosing the meta-learner\",\"authors\":\"Wouter van Loon, Marjolein Fokkema, Botond Szabo, Mark de Rooij\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11634-024-00587-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Multi-view stacking is a framework for combining information from different views (i.e. different feature sets) describing the same set of objects. In this framework, a <i>base-learner</i> algorithm is trained on each view separately, and their predictions are then combined by a <i>meta-learner</i> algorithm. In a previous study, stacked penalized logistic regression, a special case of multi-view stacking, has been shown to be useful in identifying which views are most important for prediction. In this article we expand this research by considering seven different algorithms to use as the meta-learner, and evaluating their view selection and classification performance in simulations and two applications on real gene-expression data sets. Our results suggest that if both view selection and classification accuracy are important to the research at hand, then the nonnegative lasso, nonnegative adaptive lasso and nonnegative elastic net are suitable meta-learners. Exactly which among these three is to be preferred depends on the research context. The remaining four meta-learners, namely nonnegative ridge regression, nonnegative forward selection, stability selection and the interpolating predictor, show little advantages in order to be preferred over the other three.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-024-00587-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-024-00587-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多视图堆叠是一种将描述同一组物体的不同视图(即不同特征集)的信息结合起来的框架。在这一框架中,基础学习算法对每个视图分别进行训练,然后通过元学习算法将它们的预测结果结合起来。在之前的一项研究中,多视图堆叠的一种特殊情况--堆叠惩罚逻辑回归,已被证明有助于确定哪些视图对预测最重要。在本文中,我们扩展了这一研究,考虑了七种不同的算法作为元学习器,并在模拟和真实基因表达数据集的两个应用中评估了它们的视图选择和分类性能。我们的结果表明,如果视图选择和分类准确性对当前研究都很重要,那么非负拉索、非负自适应拉索和非负弹性网就是合适的元学习器。至于这三种元学习器中哪一种更适合,则取决于研究环境。其余四种元学习器,即非负脊回归、非负前向选择、稳定性选择和插值预测器,与其他三种元学习器相比,优势不大,不值得优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
View selection in multi-view stacking: choosing the meta-learner

Multi-view stacking is a framework for combining information from different views (i.e. different feature sets) describing the same set of objects. In this framework, a base-learner algorithm is trained on each view separately, and their predictions are then combined by a meta-learner algorithm. In a previous study, stacked penalized logistic regression, a special case of multi-view stacking, has been shown to be useful in identifying which views are most important for prediction. In this article we expand this research by considering seven different algorithms to use as the meta-learner, and evaluating their view selection and classification performance in simulations and two applications on real gene-expression data sets. Our results suggest that if both view selection and classification accuracy are important to the research at hand, then the nonnegative lasso, nonnegative adaptive lasso and nonnegative elastic net are suitable meta-learners. Exactly which among these three is to be preferred depends on the research context. The remaining four meta-learners, namely nonnegative ridge regression, nonnegative forward selection, stability selection and the interpolating predictor, show little advantages in order to be preferred over the other three.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal Advances in Data Analysis and Classification (ADAC) is designed as a forum for high standard publications on research and applications concerning the extraction of knowable aspects from many types of data. It publishes articles on such topics as structural, quantitative, or statistical approaches for the analysis of data; advances in classification, clustering, and pattern recognition methods; strategies for modeling complex data and mining large data sets; methods for the extraction of knowledge from data, and applications of advanced methods in specific domains of practice. Articles illustrate how new domain-specific knowledge can be made available from data by skillful use of data analysis methods. The journal also publishes survey papers that outline, and illuminate the basic ideas and techniques of special approaches.
期刊最新文献
Special issue on “New methodologies in clustering and classification for complex and/or big data” Marginal models with individual-specific effects for the analysis of longitudinal bipartite networks Using Bagging to improve clustering methods in the context of three-dimensional shapes The chiPower transformation: a valid alternative to logratio transformations in compositional data analysis On some properties of Cronbach’s α coefficient for interval-valued data in questionnaires
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1