高速倾转旋翼机稳定性预测与测试数据的相关性及参数研究

IF 1.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Journal of Aircraft Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.2514/1.c037807
Seyhan Gul, Hyeonsoo Yeo
{"title":"高速倾转旋翼机稳定性预测与测试数据的相关性及参数研究","authors":"Seyhan Gul, Hyeonsoo Yeo","doi":"10.2514/1.c037807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>High-speed stability of tiltrotor was studied. The University of Maryland’s Maryland Tiltrotor Rig (MTR) was chosen for the analysis due to availability of properties and test data, and its interesting high-stability behavior observed in the Glenn L. Martin wind tunnel in August 2022. A Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analysis System (RCAS) model of the MTR gimbaled hub was built in addition to the University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code-II (UMARC-II) model from previous work. The objective is threefold: i) validate RCAS tiltrotor stability predictions, ii) shed light on the high-stability behavior of the MTR, and iii) find ways to lower the instability speed of the MTR for future wind tunnel tests. Trim collective for freewheeling and stability predictions were compared with wind tunnel test data up to 200 knots. RCAS and UMARC-II predictions showed good agreement with each other and the test data. Predictions show that MTR is stable up to 215 knots (490-knots full-scale flight) although the wing is only 18% thick (current technology is 23%). A parametric study was carried out. The impact of wing stiffness, pitch-flap coupling (<span><math altimg=\"eq-00001.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mrow><msub><mi>δ</mi><mn>3</mn></msub></mrow></math></span><span></span> angle), lag stiffness, blade chord, number of blades, pylon mass, pylon center of gravity (c.g.), pylon location, and rotor speed was studied. MTR’s pylon c.g. is unconventionally behind the wing elastic axis. It was found that this significantly improved stability. This behavior is not specific to MTR; full-scale aircraft stability can also be improved by moving the pylon c.g. backward if wing beam is the least stable mode. A combination of forward pylon c.g., reduced rotor speed, and increased blade chord reduced the instability speed by more than 55 knots to near 160 knots, helping researchers obtain high-quality test data in the upcoming Glenn L. Martin wind tunnel tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":14927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aircraft","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of High-Speed Tiltrotor Stability Predictions with Test Data and Parametric Study\",\"authors\":\"Seyhan Gul, Hyeonsoo Yeo\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/1.c037807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>High-speed stability of tiltrotor was studied. The University of Maryland’s Maryland Tiltrotor Rig (MTR) was chosen for the analysis due to availability of properties and test data, and its interesting high-stability behavior observed in the Glenn L. Martin wind tunnel in August 2022. A Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analysis System (RCAS) model of the MTR gimbaled hub was built in addition to the University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code-II (UMARC-II) model from previous work. The objective is threefold: i) validate RCAS tiltrotor stability predictions, ii) shed light on the high-stability behavior of the MTR, and iii) find ways to lower the instability speed of the MTR for future wind tunnel tests. Trim collective for freewheeling and stability predictions were compared with wind tunnel test data up to 200 knots. RCAS and UMARC-II predictions showed good agreement with each other and the test data. Predictions show that MTR is stable up to 215 knots (490-knots full-scale flight) although the wing is only 18% thick (current technology is 23%). A parametric study was carried out. The impact of wing stiffness, pitch-flap coupling (<span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00001.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mrow><msub><mi>δ</mi><mn>3</mn></msub></mrow></math></span><span></span> angle), lag stiffness, blade chord, number of blades, pylon mass, pylon center of gravity (c.g.), pylon location, and rotor speed was studied. MTR’s pylon c.g. is unconventionally behind the wing elastic axis. It was found that this significantly improved stability. This behavior is not specific to MTR; full-scale aircraft stability can also be improved by moving the pylon c.g. backward if wing beam is the least stable mode. A combination of forward pylon c.g., reduced rotor speed, and increased blade chord reduced the instability speed by more than 55 knots to near 160 knots, helping researchers obtain high-quality test data in the upcoming Glenn L. Martin wind tunnel tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aircraft\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aircraft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037807\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aircraft","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对倾转飞行器的高速稳定性进行了研究。选择马里兰大学的马里兰倾转旋翼机(MTR)进行分析的原因是其性能和测试数据的可用性,以及 2022 年 8 月在格伦-L-马丁风洞观察到的其有趣的高稳定性行为。除了先前工作中的马里兰大学先进旋翼机代码-II(UMARC-II)模型外,还建立了 MTR 万向轮毂的旋翼机综合分析系统(RCAS)模型。目的有三:i)验证 RCAS 对倾转旋翼机稳定性的预测;ii)阐明 MTR 的高稳定性行为;iii)为未来的风洞试验找到降低 MTR 不稳定速度的方法。用于自由旋转和稳定性预测的修整集体与高达 200 节的风洞试验数据进行了比较。RCAS 和 UMARC-II 的预测结果与测试数据一致。预测结果表明,尽管机翼厚度仅为 18%(当前技术为 23%),但 MTR 的稳定性高达 215 节(全尺寸飞行速度为 490 节)。对参数进行了研究。研究了机翼刚度、俯仰-襟翼耦合(δ3 角)、滞后刚度、叶片弦度、叶片数量、塔架质量、塔架重心(c.g.)、塔架位置和转子速度的影响。MTR 的塔架重心非传统地位于机翼弹性轴之后。研究发现,这大大提高了稳定性。这种行为并非 MTR 所特有;如果翼梁是最不稳定的模式,也可以通过将塔架 c.g. 向后移动来提高全尺寸飞机的稳定性。将塔架c.g.前移、降低旋翼速度和增加叶片弦度相结合,可将不稳定速度降低 55 节以上,接近 160 节,有助于研究人员在即将进行的格伦-L-马丁风洞试验中获得高质量的测试数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation of High-Speed Tiltrotor Stability Predictions with Test Data and Parametric Study

High-speed stability of tiltrotor was studied. The University of Maryland’s Maryland Tiltrotor Rig (MTR) was chosen for the analysis due to availability of properties and test data, and its interesting high-stability behavior observed in the Glenn L. Martin wind tunnel in August 2022. A Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analysis System (RCAS) model of the MTR gimbaled hub was built in addition to the University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code-II (UMARC-II) model from previous work. The objective is threefold: i) validate RCAS tiltrotor stability predictions, ii) shed light on the high-stability behavior of the MTR, and iii) find ways to lower the instability speed of the MTR for future wind tunnel tests. Trim collective for freewheeling and stability predictions were compared with wind tunnel test data up to 200 knots. RCAS and UMARC-II predictions showed good agreement with each other and the test data. Predictions show that MTR is stable up to 215 knots (490-knots full-scale flight) although the wing is only 18% thick (current technology is 23%). A parametric study was carried out. The impact of wing stiffness, pitch-flap coupling (δ3 angle), lag stiffness, blade chord, number of blades, pylon mass, pylon center of gravity (c.g.), pylon location, and rotor speed was studied. MTR’s pylon c.g. is unconventionally behind the wing elastic axis. It was found that this significantly improved stability. This behavior is not specific to MTR; full-scale aircraft stability can also be improved by moving the pylon c.g. backward if wing beam is the least stable mode. A combination of forward pylon c.g., reduced rotor speed, and increased blade chord reduced the instability speed by more than 55 knots to near 160 knots, helping researchers obtain high-quality test data in the upcoming Glenn L. Martin wind tunnel tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aircraft
Journal of Aircraft 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
31.80%
发文量
141
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This Journal is devoted to the advancement of the applied science and technology of airborne flight through the dissemination of original archival papers describing significant advances in aircraft, the operation of aircraft, and applications of aircraft technology to other fields. The Journal publishes qualified papers on aircraft systems, air transportation, air traffic management, and multidisciplinary design optimization of aircraft, flight mechanics, flight and ground testing, applied computational fluid dynamics, flight safety, weather and noise hazards, human factors, airport design, airline operations, application of computers to aircraft including artificial intelligence/expert systems, production methods, engineering economic analyses, affordability, reliability, maintainability, and logistics support, integration of propulsion and control systems into aircraft design and operations, aircraft aerodynamics (including unsteady aerodynamics), structural design/dynamics , aeroelasticity, and aeroacoustics. It publishes papers on general aviation, military and civilian aircraft, UAV, STOL and V/STOL, subsonic, supersonic, transonic, and hypersonic aircraft. Papers are sought which comprehensively survey results of recent technical work with emphasis on aircraft technology application.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study on a Liquid Hydrogen Tank for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Applications Numerical Study of Skipping Motion of Blended-Wing–Body Aircraft Ditching on Calm/Wavy Water Blended-Wing-Body Regional Aircraft Optimization with High-Fidelity Aerodynamics and Critical Design Requirements Towards Wall-Resolved Large-Eddy Simulation of the High-Lift Common Research Model Investigation of Hybrid Laminar Flow Control Capabilities from the Flight Envelope Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1