在线评论的图灵测试:我们能区分人工撰写的在线评论和 GPT-4 撰写的在线评论吗?

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Marketing Letters Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s11002-024-09729-3
Balázs Kovács
{"title":"在线评论的图灵测试:我们能区分人工撰写的在线评论和 GPT-4 撰写的在线评论吗?","authors":"Balázs Kovács","doi":"10.1007/s11002-024-09729-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Online reviews serve as a guide for consumer choice. With advancements in large language models (LLMs) and generative AI, the fast and inexpensive creation of human-like text may threaten the feedback function of online reviews if neither readers nor platforms can differentiate between human-written and AI-generated content. In two experiments, we found that humans cannot recognize AI-written reviews. Even with monetary incentives for accuracy, both Type I and Type II errors were common: human reviews were often mistaken for AI-generated reviews, and even more frequently, AI-generated reviews were mistaken for human reviews. This held true across various ratings, emotional tones, review lengths, and participants’ genders, education levels, and AI expertise. Younger participants were somewhat better at distinguishing between human and AI reviews. An additional study revealed that current AI detectors were also fooled by AI-generated reviews. We discuss the implications of our findings on trust erosion, manipulation, regulation, consumer behavior, AI detection, market structure, innovation, and review platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48068,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Letters","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Turing test of online reviews: Can we tell the difference between human-written and GPT-4-written online reviews?\",\"authors\":\"Balázs Kovács\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11002-024-09729-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Online reviews serve as a guide for consumer choice. With advancements in large language models (LLMs) and generative AI, the fast and inexpensive creation of human-like text may threaten the feedback function of online reviews if neither readers nor platforms can differentiate between human-written and AI-generated content. In two experiments, we found that humans cannot recognize AI-written reviews. Even with monetary incentives for accuracy, both Type I and Type II errors were common: human reviews were often mistaken for AI-generated reviews, and even more frequently, AI-generated reviews were mistaken for human reviews. This held true across various ratings, emotional tones, review lengths, and participants’ genders, education levels, and AI expertise. Younger participants were somewhat better at distinguishing between human and AI reviews. An additional study revealed that current AI detectors were also fooled by AI-generated reviews. We discuss the implications of our findings on trust erosion, manipulation, regulation, consumer behavior, AI detection, market structure, innovation, and review platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marketing Letters\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marketing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-024-09729-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-024-09729-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线评论是消费者选择的指南。随着大型语言模型(LLM)和生成式人工智能的发展,如果读者和平台都无法区分人工撰写的内容和人工智能生成的内容,那么快速、低成本地创建类人文本可能会威胁到在线评论的反馈功能。在两项实验中,我们发现人类无法识别人工智能撰写的评论。即使对准确性有金钱奖励,第一类和第二类错误也很常见:人类评论经常被误认为是人工智能生成的评论,而人工智能生成的评论更经常被误认为是人类评论。这种情况在不同的评分、情感基调、评论长度以及参与者的性别、教育水平和人工智能专业知识中都是如此。年轻参与者在区分人类评论和人工智能评论方面略胜一筹。另一项研究表明,目前的人工智能检测器也会被人工智能生成的评论所欺骗。我们讨论了我们的研究结果对信任侵蚀、操纵、监管、消费者行为、人工智能检测、市场结构、创新和评论平台的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Turing test of online reviews: Can we tell the difference between human-written and GPT-4-written online reviews?

Online reviews serve as a guide for consumer choice. With advancements in large language models (LLMs) and generative AI, the fast and inexpensive creation of human-like text may threaten the feedback function of online reviews if neither readers nor platforms can differentiate between human-written and AI-generated content. In two experiments, we found that humans cannot recognize AI-written reviews. Even with monetary incentives for accuracy, both Type I and Type II errors were common: human reviews were often mistaken for AI-generated reviews, and even more frequently, AI-generated reviews were mistaken for human reviews. This held true across various ratings, emotional tones, review lengths, and participants’ genders, education levels, and AI expertise. Younger participants were somewhat better at distinguishing between human and AI reviews. An additional study revealed that current AI detectors were also fooled by AI-generated reviews. We discuss the implications of our findings on trust erosion, manipulation, regulation, consumer behavior, AI detection, market structure, innovation, and review platforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marketing Letters
Marketing Letters BUSINESS-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Marketing Letters: A Journal of Research in Marketing publishes high-quality, shorter paper (under 5,000 words including abstract, main text and references, which is equivalent to 20 total pages, double-spaced with 12 point Times New Roman font) on marketing, the emphasis being on immediacy and current interest. The journal offers a medium for the truly rapid publication of research results. The focus of Marketing Letters is on empirical findings, methodological papers, and theoretical and conceptual insights across areas of research in marketing. Marketing Letters is required reading for anyone working in marketing science, consumer research, methodology, and marketing strategy and management. The key subject areas and topics covered in Marketing Letters are: choice models, consumer behavior, consumer research, management science, market research, sales and advertising, marketing management, marketing research, marketing science, psychology, and statistics. Officially cited as: Mark Lett
期刊最新文献
Impacts of generative AI on user contributions: evidence from a coding Q &A platform Advancing the science of marketing Myopic marketing management and stock performance in the short term: the moderating role of asset turnover Celebrating excellence: insights from the 2024 Paul D. Converse Symposium Navigating choices: a framework of consumer search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1