为什么把自己放在神坛上?A/E基座的致病作用

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Infection and Immunity Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1128/iai.00489-23
M. V. Miner, I. Rauch
{"title":"为什么把自己放在神坛上?A/E基座的致病作用","authors":"M. V. Miner, I. Rauch","doi":"10.1128/iai.00489-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of enterobacterial pathogens is of critical importance, given the nearly\n63,000 annual diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (E. coli)-related deaths worldwide (1, 2). In particular, enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) is a leading cause of infantile diarrhea, often contracted through the fecal-oral\nroute via food or water (3). Attaching and effacing (A/E) pathogens, like EPEC, are named for their signature\nlesion on the intestinal epithelium during infection. The characteristics of these\nattaching and effacing lesions are effacement of the intestinal brush border, intimate\nattachment to the host epithelium, and the formation of actin-rich pedestals below\nthe site of bacterial adherence. These pedestals are derived from bacterial-driven\nactin nucleation inside the host cell, creating a protrusion in the plasma membrane.\nEnterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) is another human A/E pathogen that is similar to EPEC but can be distinguished\nfrom EPEC by its pathogenic and geographic features. Although EPEC is prevalent in\nlow- and middle-income countries, EHEC is pervasive in developed countries. EPEC preferentially\ninfects the small intestine, and EHEC preferentially infects the colon. Additionally,\nonly EHEC produces Shiga toxin (Stx) that can inhibit protein synthesis in eukaryotic\ncells and is a cause of many of the systemic symptoms experienced, including long-term\nrenal damage and hemolytic uremic syndrome (4, 5). Regardless of their clinical differences, both EPEC and EHEC are often studied\nusing the murine pathogen Citrobacter rodentium (C. rodentium) as a proxy (6–8). All three pathogens encode the Locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity\nisland, which encodes a type III secretion system and is required for virulence. C. rodentium possesses the same LEE pathogenicity island-encoded effectors that are required for\nEPEC and EHEC virulence (9–11). However, the three AE pathogens have other effectors that are not a part of the\nLEE pathogenicity island, contributing to distinct characteristics in each pathogen.\nThese A/E lesion pathogens are a continuous object of study due, in part, to their\nunique ability to form pedestals and the unknown role the pedestals play in infection.","PeriodicalId":13541,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Immunity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why put yourself on a pedestal? The pathogenic role of the A/E pedestal\",\"authors\":\"M. V. Miner, I. Rauch\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/iai.00489-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of enterobacterial pathogens is of critical importance, given the nearly\\n63,000 annual diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (E. coli)-related deaths worldwide (1, 2). In particular, enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) is a leading cause of infantile diarrhea, often contracted through the fecal-oral\\nroute via food or water (3). Attaching and effacing (A/E) pathogens, like EPEC, are named for their signature\\nlesion on the intestinal epithelium during infection. The characteristics of these\\nattaching and effacing lesions are effacement of the intestinal brush border, intimate\\nattachment to the host epithelium, and the formation of actin-rich pedestals below\\nthe site of bacterial adherence. These pedestals are derived from bacterial-driven\\nactin nucleation inside the host cell, creating a protrusion in the plasma membrane.\\nEnterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) is another human A/E pathogen that is similar to EPEC but can be distinguished\\nfrom EPEC by its pathogenic and geographic features. Although EPEC is prevalent in\\nlow- and middle-income countries, EHEC is pervasive in developed countries. EPEC preferentially\\ninfects the small intestine, and EHEC preferentially infects the colon. Additionally,\\nonly EHEC produces Shiga toxin (Stx) that can inhibit protein synthesis in eukaryotic\\ncells and is a cause of many of the systemic symptoms experienced, including long-term\\nrenal damage and hemolytic uremic syndrome (4, 5). Regardless of their clinical differences, both EPEC and EHEC are often studied\\nusing the murine pathogen Citrobacter rodentium (C. rodentium) as a proxy (6–8). All three pathogens encode the Locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity\\nisland, which encodes a type III secretion system and is required for virulence. C. rodentium possesses the same LEE pathogenicity island-encoded effectors that are required for\\nEPEC and EHEC virulence (9–11). However, the three AE pathogens have other effectors that are not a part of the\\nLEE pathogenicity island, contributing to distinct characteristics in each pathogen.\\nThese A/E lesion pathogens are a continuous object of study due, in part, to their\\nunique ability to form pedestals and the unknown role the pedestals play in infection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection and Immunity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection and Immunity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00489-23\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00489-23","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于全球每年有近 6.3 万例与腹泻致病性大肠杆菌(E. coli)相关的死亡病例(1, 2),研究肠道细菌病原体至关重要。尤其是肠致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC)是婴儿腹泻的主要病因,通常是通过食物或水的粪口途径感染的(3)。附着和脱落(A/E)病原体,如 EPEC,因其在感染期间在肠道上皮细胞上的特征性附着而得名。这些附着和脱落病变的特征是肠道刷状缘脱落、与宿主上皮亲密附着以及在细菌附着部位下方形成富含肌动蛋白的基座。肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)是另一种人类 A/E病原体,与 EPEC 相似,但可通过其致病性和地理特征与 EPEC 区分开来。虽然 EPEC 常见于中低收入国家,但 EHEC 却普遍存在于发达国家。EPEC 主要感染小肠,而 EHEC 主要感染结肠。此外,只有 EHEC 能产生志贺毒素(Stx),该毒素可抑制真核细胞的蛋白质合成,是导致许多全身症状的原因,包括长期肾损害和溶血性尿毒症综合征(4,5)。尽管 EPEC 和 EHEC 在临床上存在差异,但它们经常被用作鼠类病原体棒状杆菌(C. rodentium)的替代物进行研究(6-8)。这三种病原体都编码肠细胞脱落(LEE)致病基因,该基因编码 III 型分泌系统,是致病力所必需的。鼠伤寒杆菌也拥有同样的由 LEE 致病性岛编码的效应器,这些效应器是EPEC 和 EHEC 致病性所必需的(9-11)。然而,这三种 AE 病原体还具有不属于 LEE 致病性岛的其他效应器,从而使每种病原体都具有不同的特征。这些 A/E 病变病原体是一个持续的研究对象,部分原因是它们具有形成基座的独特能力,而基座在感染中所起的作用尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why put yourself on a pedestal? The pathogenic role of the A/E pedestal
The study of enterobacterial pathogens is of critical importance, given the nearly 63,000 annual diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (E. coli)-related deaths worldwide (1, 2). In particular, enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) is a leading cause of infantile diarrhea, often contracted through the fecal-oral route via food or water (3). Attaching and effacing (A/E) pathogens, like EPEC, are named for their signature lesion on the intestinal epithelium during infection. The characteristics of these attaching and effacing lesions are effacement of the intestinal brush border, intimate attachment to the host epithelium, and the formation of actin-rich pedestals below the site of bacterial adherence. These pedestals are derived from bacterial-driven actin nucleation inside the host cell, creating a protrusion in the plasma membrane. Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) is another human A/E pathogen that is similar to EPEC but can be distinguished from EPEC by its pathogenic and geographic features. Although EPEC is prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, EHEC is pervasive in developed countries. EPEC preferentially infects the small intestine, and EHEC preferentially infects the colon. Additionally, only EHEC produces Shiga toxin (Stx) that can inhibit protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells and is a cause of many of the systemic symptoms experienced, including long-term renal damage and hemolytic uremic syndrome (4, 5). Regardless of their clinical differences, both EPEC and EHEC are often studied using the murine pathogen Citrobacter rodentium (C. rodentium) as a proxy (6–8). All three pathogens encode the Locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island, which encodes a type III secretion system and is required for virulence. C. rodentium possesses the same LEE pathogenicity island-encoded effectors that are required for EPEC and EHEC virulence (9–11). However, the three AE pathogens have other effectors that are not a part of the LEE pathogenicity island, contributing to distinct characteristics in each pathogen. These A/E lesion pathogens are a continuous object of study due, in part, to their unique ability to form pedestals and the unknown role the pedestals play in infection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection and Immunity
Infection and Immunity 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Infection and Immunity (IAI) provides new insights into the interactions between bacterial, fungal and parasitic pathogens and their hosts. Specific areas of interest include mechanisms of molecular pathogenesis, virulence factors, cellular microbiology, experimental models of infection, host resistance or susceptibility, and the generation of innate and adaptive immune responses. IAI also welcomes studies of the microbiome relating to host-pathogen interactions.
期刊最新文献
Molecular mechanisms of Coxiella burnetii formalin-fixed cellular vaccine reactogenicity. The human gut microbiome in health and disease: time for a new chapter? Orientia tsutsugamushi infection reduces host gluconeogenic but not glycolytic substrates. Synergistic blockade of TIGIT and PD-L1 increases type-1 inflammation and improves parasite control during murine blood-stage Plasmodium yoelii non-lethal infection. A cynomolgus monkey E. coli urinary tract infection model confirms efficacy of new FimH vaccine candidates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1