避孕咨询能否改善流产后的避孕选择?一项评估患者看法的多中心研究

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102786
Silvia von Wunster , Paola Algeri , Giovanna Scassellati , Silvana Agatone , Donata Spazzini , Giangavino Peppi , Annamaria Cicchitti , Salvatore Di Leo , Carmelina Ermio , Mariangela Pati , Nunzia Mastrocola , Daniela Granata , Maurizio Silvestri , Romina Pinton , Laura Giambanco , Stefano Grandi , Maria Antonietta Molinari , Laura Imbruglia , Antonio Chiantera , Vito Trojano , Fabio Parazzini
{"title":"避孕咨询能否改善流产后的避孕选择?一项评估患者看法的多中心研究","authors":"Silvia von Wunster ,&nbsp;Paola Algeri ,&nbsp;Giovanna Scassellati ,&nbsp;Silvana Agatone ,&nbsp;Donata Spazzini ,&nbsp;Giangavino Peppi ,&nbsp;Annamaria Cicchitti ,&nbsp;Salvatore Di Leo ,&nbsp;Carmelina Ermio ,&nbsp;Mariangela Pati ,&nbsp;Nunzia Mastrocola ,&nbsp;Daniela Granata ,&nbsp;Maurizio Silvestri ,&nbsp;Romina Pinton ,&nbsp;Laura Giambanco ,&nbsp;Stefano Grandi ,&nbsp;Maria Antonietta Molinari ,&nbsp;Laura Imbruglia ,&nbsp;Antonio Chiantera ,&nbsp;Vito Trojano ,&nbsp;Fabio Parazzini","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>24 % of abortion in Italy are repeated procedure. The cause of repeated abortion can be traced back to the inadequacy of the contraceptive counseling during the previous admission or to the adoption of an ineffective contraception method.</p><p>This study aims to evaluate the Italian situation on the perceived quality of contraceptive counselling by patients undergoing abortion. The second aim is to verify if the chosen methods were available for immediate start.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Multicentric, prospective, non-interventional, non-randomized, non-pharmacological clinical observational study. We analyzed anonymous questionnaires on contraceptive counseling and LARC (Long Acting Reversable Contraceptives) availability and SARC (Short Acting Reversable Contraceptives) prescription at hospital discharge, distributed to women who requested abortion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1074 participants on 15 hospitals through Italy. 82 % of the interviewees reported that they had received correct information regarding contraception. 74 % of the patients who chose LARC methods reported to have them inserted at the time of abortion. 73 % of women who had chosen a SARC method stated that they had received the prescription before discharge. After contraceptive counselling, we reported a significative reduction of “none or natural methods use” and a significant <del>i</del>ncrease of SARC and LARC use compared to before the abortion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Contraceptive counselling could allow a better contraceptive choice in patient who required abortion and we hope that future strategies will implement LARC choice. We think that a greater availability of LARC at an affordable price at the time of abortion could improve LARC choice. In case of SARC choice, we have to implement the prescription at hospital discharged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 7","pages":"Article 102786"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could the contraceptive counselling improve contraceptive choice after abortion? A multicentric study to evaluate patients’ perception\",\"authors\":\"Silvia von Wunster ,&nbsp;Paola Algeri ,&nbsp;Giovanna Scassellati ,&nbsp;Silvana Agatone ,&nbsp;Donata Spazzini ,&nbsp;Giangavino Peppi ,&nbsp;Annamaria Cicchitti ,&nbsp;Salvatore Di Leo ,&nbsp;Carmelina Ermio ,&nbsp;Mariangela Pati ,&nbsp;Nunzia Mastrocola ,&nbsp;Daniela Granata ,&nbsp;Maurizio Silvestri ,&nbsp;Romina Pinton ,&nbsp;Laura Giambanco ,&nbsp;Stefano Grandi ,&nbsp;Maria Antonietta Molinari ,&nbsp;Laura Imbruglia ,&nbsp;Antonio Chiantera ,&nbsp;Vito Trojano ,&nbsp;Fabio Parazzini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>24 % of abortion in Italy are repeated procedure. The cause of repeated abortion can be traced back to the inadequacy of the contraceptive counseling during the previous admission or to the adoption of an ineffective contraception method.</p><p>This study aims to evaluate the Italian situation on the perceived quality of contraceptive counselling by patients undergoing abortion. The second aim is to verify if the chosen methods were available for immediate start.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Multicentric, prospective, non-interventional, non-randomized, non-pharmacological clinical observational study. We analyzed anonymous questionnaires on contraceptive counseling and LARC (Long Acting Reversable Contraceptives) availability and SARC (Short Acting Reversable Contraceptives) prescription at hospital discharge, distributed to women who requested abortion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1074 participants on 15 hospitals through Italy. 82 % of the interviewees reported that they had received correct information regarding contraception. 74 % of the patients who chose LARC methods reported to have them inserted at the time of abortion. 73 % of women who had chosen a SARC method stated that they had received the prescription before discharge. After contraceptive counselling, we reported a significative reduction of “none or natural methods use” and a significant <del>i</del>ncrease of SARC and LARC use compared to before the abortion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Contraceptive counselling could allow a better contraceptive choice in patient who required abortion and we hope that future strategies will implement LARC choice. We think that a greater availability of LARC at an affordable price at the time of abortion could improve LARC choice. In case of SARC choice, we have to implement the prescription at hospital discharged.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"53 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 102786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000643\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言在意大利,24%的人工流产属于重复流产。本研究旨在评估意大利人工流产患者对避孕咨询质量的看法。研究设计多中心、前瞻性、非干预、非随机、非药理学临床观察研究。我们分析了向要求流产的妇女发放的匿名问卷,内容涉及避孕咨询、LARC(长效可逆转避孕药)的可用性以及出院时的 SARC(短效可逆转避孕药)处方。82%的受访者表示她们获得了正确的避孕信息。74%的选择 LARC 方法的患者表示在流产时植入了 LARC 方法。73% 选择 SARC 方法的妇女表示在出院前收到了处方。与人工流产前相比,经过避孕咨询后,我们发现 "不使用或使用自然避孕法 "的比例显著下降,而使用 SARC 和 LARC 的比例显著上升。我们认为,在人工流产时以可承受的价格提供更多的 LARC 可提高 LARC 的选择率。如果选择 SARC,我们必须在出院时执行处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Could the contraceptive counselling improve contraceptive choice after abortion? A multicentric study to evaluate patients’ perception

Introduction

24 % of abortion in Italy are repeated procedure. The cause of repeated abortion can be traced back to the inadequacy of the contraceptive counseling during the previous admission or to the adoption of an ineffective contraception method.

This study aims to evaluate the Italian situation on the perceived quality of contraceptive counselling by patients undergoing abortion. The second aim is to verify if the chosen methods were available for immediate start.

Study design

Multicentric, prospective, non-interventional, non-randomized, non-pharmacological clinical observational study. We analyzed anonymous questionnaires on contraceptive counseling and LARC (Long Acting Reversable Contraceptives) availability and SARC (Short Acting Reversable Contraceptives) prescription at hospital discharge, distributed to women who requested abortion.

Results

1074 participants on 15 hospitals through Italy. 82 % of the interviewees reported that they had received correct information regarding contraception. 74 % of the patients who chose LARC methods reported to have them inserted at the time of abortion. 73 % of women who had chosen a SARC method stated that they had received the prescription before discharge. After contraceptive counselling, we reported a significative reduction of “none or natural methods use” and a significant increase of SARC and LARC use compared to before the abortion.

Conclusion

Contraceptive counselling could allow a better contraceptive choice in patient who required abortion and we hope that future strategies will implement LARC choice. We think that a greater availability of LARC at an affordable price at the time of abortion could improve LARC choice. In case of SARC choice, we have to implement the prescription at hospital discharged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1