比特币骨干协议:分析与应用

IF 2.3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE Journal of the ACM Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1145/3653445
Juan A. Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Nikos Leonardos
{"title":"比特币骨干协议:分析与应用","authors":"Juan A. Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Nikos Leonardos","doi":"10.1145/3653445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bitcoin is the first and most popular decentralized cryptocurrency to date. In this work, we extract and analyze the core of the Bitcoin protocol, which we term the Bitcoin <i>backbone</i>, and prove three of its fundamental properties which we call <i>Common Prefix</i>, <i>Chain Quality</i> and <i>Chain Growth</i> in the static setting where the number of players remains fixed. Our proofs hinge on appropriate and novel assumptions on the “hashing power” of the protocol participants and their interplay with the protocol parameters and the time needed for reliable message passing between honest parties in terms of computational steps. A takeaway from our analysis is that, all else being equal, the protocol’s provable tolerance in terms of the number of adversarial parties (or, equivalently, their “hashing power” in our model) decreases as the duration of a message passing round increases. </p><p>Next, we propose and analyze applications that can be built “on top” of the backbone protocol, specifically focusing on Byzantine agreement (BA) and on the notion of a public transaction ledger. Regarding BA, we observe that a proposal due to Nakamoto falls short of solving it, and present a simple alternative which works assuming that the adversary’s hashing power is bounded by 1/3. The public transaction ledger captures the essence of Bitcoin’s operation as a cryptocurrency, in the sense that it guarantees the liveness and persistence of committed transactions. Based on this notion we describe and analyze the Bitcoin system as well as a more elaborate BA protocol and we prove them secure assuming the adversary’s hashing power is strictly less than 1/2. Instrumental to this latter result is a technique we call <i>2-for-1 proof-of-work</i>\n(PoW) that has proven to be useful in the design of other PoW-based protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":50022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ACM","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and Applications\",\"authors\":\"Juan A. Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Nikos Leonardos\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3653445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bitcoin is the first and most popular decentralized cryptocurrency to date. In this work, we extract and analyze the core of the Bitcoin protocol, which we term the Bitcoin <i>backbone</i>, and prove three of its fundamental properties which we call <i>Common Prefix</i>, <i>Chain Quality</i> and <i>Chain Growth</i> in the static setting where the number of players remains fixed. Our proofs hinge on appropriate and novel assumptions on the “hashing power” of the protocol participants and their interplay with the protocol parameters and the time needed for reliable message passing between honest parties in terms of computational steps. A takeaway from our analysis is that, all else being equal, the protocol’s provable tolerance in terms of the number of adversarial parties (or, equivalently, their “hashing power” in our model) decreases as the duration of a message passing round increases. </p><p>Next, we propose and analyze applications that can be built “on top” of the backbone protocol, specifically focusing on Byzantine agreement (BA) and on the notion of a public transaction ledger. Regarding BA, we observe that a proposal due to Nakamoto falls short of solving it, and present a simple alternative which works assuming that the adversary’s hashing power is bounded by 1/3. The public transaction ledger captures the essence of Bitcoin’s operation as a cryptocurrency, in the sense that it guarantees the liveness and persistence of committed transactions. Based on this notion we describe and analyze the Bitcoin system as well as a more elaborate BA protocol and we prove them secure assuming the adversary’s hashing power is strictly less than 1/2. Instrumental to this latter result is a technique we call <i>2-for-1 proof-of-work</i>\\n(PoW) that has proven to be useful in the design of other PoW-based protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the ACM\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the ACM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3653445\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ACM","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3653445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比特币是迄今为止第一种也是最流行的去中心化加密货币。在这项工作中,我们提取并分析了比特币协议的核心(我们称之为比特币主干),并证明了它的三个基本属性,我们称之为静态环境下的通用前缀、链质量和链增长(玩家数量保持固定)。我们的证明依赖于对协议参与者 "散列能力 "的适当而新颖的假设,以及这些假设与协议参数和诚实各方之间可靠信息传递所需的计算步骤之间的相互作用。我们的分析得出的一个结论是,在其他条件相同的情况下,随着一轮信息传递持续时间的增加,协议在敌对方数量(或等同于我们模型中的敌对方 "散列能力")方面的可证明容忍度会降低。接下来,我们提出并分析了可以建立在骨干协议 "之上 "的应用,特别是拜占庭协议(BA)和公共交易分类账的概念。关于拜占庭协议,我们注意到中本聪提出的建议无法解决这一问题,并提出了一个简单的替代方案,该方案假设对手的散列能力以 1/3 为界。公共交易账本抓住了比特币作为加密货币运行的本质,因为它保证了已承诺交易的有效性和持久性。基于这一概念,我们描述并分析了比特币系统和一个更复杂的 BA 协议,并证明了它们的安全性,前提是对手的散列能力严格小于 1/2。我们称之为 2-for-1 工作证明(PoW)的技术对后一个结果至关重要,这种技术已被证明在设计其他基于 PoW 的协议时非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and Applications

Bitcoin is the first and most popular decentralized cryptocurrency to date. In this work, we extract and analyze the core of the Bitcoin protocol, which we term the Bitcoin backbone, and prove three of its fundamental properties which we call Common Prefix, Chain Quality and Chain Growth in the static setting where the number of players remains fixed. Our proofs hinge on appropriate and novel assumptions on the “hashing power” of the protocol participants and their interplay with the protocol parameters and the time needed for reliable message passing between honest parties in terms of computational steps. A takeaway from our analysis is that, all else being equal, the protocol’s provable tolerance in terms of the number of adversarial parties (or, equivalently, their “hashing power” in our model) decreases as the duration of a message passing round increases.

Next, we propose and analyze applications that can be built “on top” of the backbone protocol, specifically focusing on Byzantine agreement (BA) and on the notion of a public transaction ledger. Regarding BA, we observe that a proposal due to Nakamoto falls short of solving it, and present a simple alternative which works assuming that the adversary’s hashing power is bounded by 1/3. The public transaction ledger captures the essence of Bitcoin’s operation as a cryptocurrency, in the sense that it guarantees the liveness and persistence of committed transactions. Based on this notion we describe and analyze the Bitcoin system as well as a more elaborate BA protocol and we prove them secure assuming the adversary’s hashing power is strictly less than 1/2. Instrumental to this latter result is a technique we call 2-for-1 proof-of-work (PoW) that has proven to be useful in the design of other PoW-based protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the ACM
Journal of the ACM 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The best indicator of the scope of the journal is provided by the areas covered by its Editorial Board. These areas change from time to time, as the field evolves. The following areas are currently covered by a member of the Editorial Board: Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization; Algorithms and Data Structures; Algorithms, Combinatorial Optimization, and Games; Artificial Intelligence; Complexity Theory; Computational Biology; Computational Geometry; Computer Graphics and Computer Vision; Computer-Aided Verification; Cryptography and Security; Cyber-Physical, Embedded, and Real-Time Systems; Database Systems and Theory; Distributed Computing; Economics and Computation; Information Theory; Logic and Computation; Logic, Algorithms, and Complexity; Machine Learning and Computational Learning Theory; Networking; Parallel Computing and Architecture; Programming Languages; Quantum Computing; Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis of Algorithms; Scientific Computing and High Performance Computing; Software Engineering; Web Algorithms and Data Mining
期刊最新文献
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling Transaction Fee Mechanism Design Sparse Higher Order Čech Filtrations Killing a Vortex Separations in Proof Complexity and TFNP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1