{"title":"劳动进程阴影下的艾伦-福克斯","authors":"Niall Cullinane","doi":"10.1108/er-07-2023-0384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The 50th anniversary of Fox's <em>Beyond Contract</em> and <em>Man Mismanagement</em> coincides with another vital contribution to the sociology of work from 1974: Braverman's <em>Labor and Monopoly Capital</em>. This article analyses these two scholars' complementary approaches to job design and the extent to which Fox's ideas influenced subsequent labour process thought.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The article's methodological approach is a historiographical reading of Fox and Braverman's thought in the context of their times and later scholarship.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The article demonstrates that despite some noteworthy overlap with Braverman concerning scientific management, Fox's insights were marginal to later iterations of labour process analysis. It delves into the reasons for this relative neglect, providing an understanding of the dynamics at play.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper's value lies in its combined industrial relations and labour process historiography. It offers a fresh perspective on Alan Fox's relationship to the latter field of study.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47857,"journal":{"name":"Employee Relations","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alan Fox in the shadow of the labour process\",\"authors\":\"Niall Cullinane\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/er-07-2023-0384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The 50th anniversary of Fox's <em>Beyond Contract</em> and <em>Man Mismanagement</em> coincides with another vital contribution to the sociology of work from 1974: Braverman's <em>Labor and Monopoly Capital</em>. This article analyses these two scholars' complementary approaches to job design and the extent to which Fox's ideas influenced subsequent labour process thought.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The article's methodological approach is a historiographical reading of Fox and Braverman's thought in the context of their times and later scholarship.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The article demonstrates that despite some noteworthy overlap with Braverman concerning scientific management, Fox's insights were marginal to later iterations of labour process analysis. It delves into the reasons for this relative neglect, providing an understanding of the dynamics at play.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper's value lies in its combined industrial relations and labour process historiography. It offers a fresh perspective on Alan Fox's relationship to the latter field of study.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employee Relations\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employee Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/er-07-2023-0384\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/er-07-2023-0384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
The 50th anniversary of Fox's Beyond Contract and Man Mismanagement coincides with another vital contribution to the sociology of work from 1974: Braverman's Labor and Monopoly Capital. This article analyses these two scholars' complementary approaches to job design and the extent to which Fox's ideas influenced subsequent labour process thought.
Design/methodology/approach
The article's methodological approach is a historiographical reading of Fox and Braverman's thought in the context of their times and later scholarship.
Findings
The article demonstrates that despite some noteworthy overlap with Braverman concerning scientific management, Fox's insights were marginal to later iterations of labour process analysis. It delves into the reasons for this relative neglect, providing an understanding of the dynamics at play.
Originality/value
This paper's value lies in its combined industrial relations and labour process historiography. It offers a fresh perspective on Alan Fox's relationship to the latter field of study.
期刊介绍：
■Communication, participation and involvement ■Developments in collective bargaining ■Equal opportunities ■Health and safety ■HRM ■Industrial relations and employment protection law ■Industrial relations management and reform ■Organizational change and people ■Personnel and recruitment ■Quality of working life
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
