采用新型分类法捕捉重构引起的代码气味

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Science of Computer Programming Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1016/j.scico.2024.103120
Mashail N. Alkhomsan , Mohammad Alshayeb , Malak Baslyman
{"title":"采用新型分类法捕捉重构引起的代码气味","authors":"Mashail N. Alkhomsan ,&nbsp;Mohammad Alshayeb ,&nbsp;Malak Baslyman","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Code smells tend to have an impact on software quality attributes such as reusability, maintainability, and understandability. These are code flaws that do not necessarily prevent the system from operating; rather, they increase the possibility of defects occurring in the future. Hence, to maintain code quality, code smells should be detected and corrected through refactoring. The objective of this paper is to investigate the associated risk of applying refactoring techniques and reveal the bad smells that may appear when fixing other bad smells. We conducted several controlled experiments to identify the smells that emerge after refactoring. The experiments resulted in a novel taxonomy revealing 9 bad smells that may appear as a result of fixing other bad smells. This represents the first study attempting to systematically identify and organize such refactoring-smell relationships into a taxonomy. The research results can assist developers in relating different bad smells to each other and helping them determine the refactoring technique that should be applied when certain smells are present. Moreover, the results can be beneficial in breaking the cycle of bad smells. Such knowledge tends to enhance code refactoring, which in turn will improve software quality and avoid technical debt.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49561,"journal":{"name":"Science of Computer Programming","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 103120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a novel taxonomy to capture code smells caused by refactoring\",\"authors\":\"Mashail N. Alkhomsan ,&nbsp;Mohammad Alshayeb ,&nbsp;Malak Baslyman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Code smells tend to have an impact on software quality attributes such as reusability, maintainability, and understandability. These are code flaws that do not necessarily prevent the system from operating; rather, they increase the possibility of defects occurring in the future. Hence, to maintain code quality, code smells should be detected and corrected through refactoring. The objective of this paper is to investigate the associated risk of applying refactoring techniques and reveal the bad smells that may appear when fixing other bad smells. We conducted several controlled experiments to identify the smells that emerge after refactoring. The experiments resulted in a novel taxonomy revealing 9 bad smells that may appear as a result of fixing other bad smells. This represents the first study attempting to systematically identify and organize such refactoring-smell relationships into a taxonomy. The research results can assist developers in relating different bad smells to each other and helping them determine the refactoring technique that should be applied when certain smells are present. Moreover, the results can be beneficial in breaking the cycle of bad smells. Such knowledge tends to enhance code refactoring, which in turn will improve software quality and avoid technical debt.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Computer Programming\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Computer Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324000431\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Computer Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324000431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

代码缺陷往往会影响软件质量属性,如可重复性、可维护性和可理解性。这些代码缺陷并不一定会妨碍系统运行,相反,它们会增加将来出现缺陷的可能性。因此,为了保持代码质量,应通过重构来检测和纠正代码缺陷。本文旨在研究应用重构技术的相关风险,并揭示在修复其他不良气味时可能出现的不良气味。我们进行了几项对照实验,以确定重构后出现的异味。实验得出了一种新的分类法,揭示了在修复其他不良气味时可能出现的 9 种不良气味。这是首次尝试系统性地识别和整理此类重构气味关系并将其分类的研究。研究成果可以帮助开发人员将不同的不良气味相互联系起来,并帮助他们确定在出现某些气味时应采用的重构技术。此外,研究成果还有助于打破坏味道的循环。这些知识往往能加强代码重构,进而提高软件质量,避免技术债务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a novel taxonomy to capture code smells caused by refactoring

Code smells tend to have an impact on software quality attributes such as reusability, maintainability, and understandability. These are code flaws that do not necessarily prevent the system from operating; rather, they increase the possibility of defects occurring in the future. Hence, to maintain code quality, code smells should be detected and corrected through refactoring. The objective of this paper is to investigate the associated risk of applying refactoring techniques and reveal the bad smells that may appear when fixing other bad smells. We conducted several controlled experiments to identify the smells that emerge after refactoring. The experiments resulted in a novel taxonomy revealing 9 bad smells that may appear as a result of fixing other bad smells. This represents the first study attempting to systematically identify and organize such refactoring-smell relationships into a taxonomy. The research results can assist developers in relating different bad smells to each other and helping them determine the refactoring technique that should be applied when certain smells are present. Moreover, the results can be beneficial in breaking the cycle of bad smells. Such knowledge tends to enhance code refactoring, which in turn will improve software quality and avoid technical debt.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of Computer Programming
Science of Computer Programming 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Science of Computer Programming is dedicated to the distribution of research results in the areas of software systems development, use and maintenance, including the software aspects of hardware design. The journal has a wide scope ranging from the many facets of methodological foundations to the details of technical issues andthe aspects of industrial practice. The subjects of interest to SCP cover the entire spectrum of methods for the entire life cycle of software systems, including • Requirements, specification, design, validation, verification, coding, testing, maintenance, metrics and renovation of software; • Design, implementation and evaluation of programming languages; • Programming environments, development tools, visualisation and animation; • Management of the development process; • Human factors in software, software for social interaction, software for social computing; • Cyber physical systems, and software for the interaction between the physical and the machine; • Software aspects of infrastructure services, system administration, and network management.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Assessing the coverage of W-based conformance testing methods over code faults Analysis and formal specification of OpenJDK's BitSet: Proof files Parametric ontologies in formal software engineering CAN-Verify: Automated analysis for BDI agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1