基于相似性搜索的制造工艺选择:在形状描述符比较中纳入非形状信息

IF 5.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1007/s10845-024-02368-5
Zhichao Wang, Xiaoliang Yan, Jacob Bjorni, Mahmoud Dinar, Shreyes Melkote, David Rosen
{"title":"基于相似性搜索的制造工艺选择:在形状描述符比较中纳入非形状信息","authors":"Zhichao Wang, Xiaoliang Yan, Jacob Bjorni, Mahmoud Dinar, Shreyes Melkote, David Rosen","doi":"10.1007/s10845-024-02368-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given a part design, the task of manufacturing process selection chooses an appropriate manufacturing process to fabricate it. Prior research has traditionally determined manufacturing processes through direct classification. However, an alternative approach to select a manufacturing process for a new design involves identifying previously produced parts with comparable shapes and materials and learning from them. Finding similar designs from a large dataset of previously manufactured parts is a challenging problem. To solve this problem, researchers have proposed different spatial and spectral shape descriptors to extract shape features including the D2 distribution, spherical harmonics (SH), and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), as well as the application of different machine learning methods on various representations of 3D part models like multi-view images, voxel, triangle mesh, and point cloud. However, there has not been a comprehensive analysis of these different shape descriptors, especially for part similarity search aimed at manufacturing process selection. To remedy this gap, this paper presents an in-depth comparative study of these shape descriptors for part similarity search. While we acknowledge the importance of factors like part size, tolerance, and cost in manufacturing process selection, this paper focuses on part shape and material properties only. Our findings show that SH performs the best among non-machine learning methods for manufacturing process selection, yielding 97.96% testing accuracy using the proposed quantitative evaluation metric. For machine learning methods, deep learning on multi-view image representations is best, yielding 99.85% testing accuracy when rotational invariance is not a primary concern. Deep learning on point cloud representations excels, yielding 99.44% testing accuracy when considering rotational invariance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manufacturing process selection based on similarity search: incorporating non-shape information in shape descriptor comparison\",\"authors\":\"Zhichao Wang, Xiaoliang Yan, Jacob Bjorni, Mahmoud Dinar, Shreyes Melkote, David Rosen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10845-024-02368-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Given a part design, the task of manufacturing process selection chooses an appropriate manufacturing process to fabricate it. Prior research has traditionally determined manufacturing processes through direct classification. However, an alternative approach to select a manufacturing process for a new design involves identifying previously produced parts with comparable shapes and materials and learning from them. Finding similar designs from a large dataset of previously manufactured parts is a challenging problem. To solve this problem, researchers have proposed different spatial and spectral shape descriptors to extract shape features including the D2 distribution, spherical harmonics (SH), and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), as well as the application of different machine learning methods on various representations of 3D part models like multi-view images, voxel, triangle mesh, and point cloud. However, there has not been a comprehensive analysis of these different shape descriptors, especially for part similarity search aimed at manufacturing process selection. To remedy this gap, this paper presents an in-depth comparative study of these shape descriptors for part similarity search. While we acknowledge the importance of factors like part size, tolerance, and cost in manufacturing process selection, this paper focuses on part shape and material properties only. Our findings show that SH performs the best among non-machine learning methods for manufacturing process selection, yielding 97.96% testing accuracy using the proposed quantitative evaluation metric. For machine learning methods, deep learning on multi-view image representations is best, yielding 99.85% testing accuracy when rotational invariance is not a primary concern. Deep learning on point cloud representations excels, yielding 99.44% testing accuracy when considering rotational invariance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02368-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02368-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

给定一个零件设计,制造工艺选择任务就是选择一个合适的制造工艺来制造它。以往的研究传统上是通过直接分类来确定制造工艺。然而,为新设计选择制造工艺的另一种方法是识别以前生产的具有相似形状和材料的零件,并从中学习。从大量以前生产的零件数据集中找到相似的设计是一个具有挑战性的问题。为了解决这个问题,研究人员提出了不同的空间和频谱形状描述符来提取形状特征,包括 D2 分布、球面谐波 (SH) 和快速傅立叶变换 (FFT),以及在多视图图像、体素、三角网格和点云等各种三维零件模型表示上应用不同的机器学习方法。然而,目前还没有对这些不同的形状描述符进行全面的分析,特别是针对制造工艺选择的零件相似性搜索。为了弥补这一不足,本文对这些形状描述符进行了深入的比较研究,以用于零件相似性搜索。我们承认零件尺寸、公差和成本等因素在制造工艺选择中的重要性,但本文只关注零件形状和材料属性。我们的研究结果表明,在用于制造工艺选择的非机器学习方法中,SH 的表现最佳,使用所提出的量化评估指标,其测试准确率为 97.96%。就机器学习方法而言,多视图图像表示的深度学习效果最好,在旋转不变性不是主要考虑因素的情况下,测试准确率达到 99.85%。点云表示的深度学习效果最佳,在考虑旋转不变性的情况下,测试准确率为 99.44%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Manufacturing process selection based on similarity search: incorporating non-shape information in shape descriptor comparison

Given a part design, the task of manufacturing process selection chooses an appropriate manufacturing process to fabricate it. Prior research has traditionally determined manufacturing processes through direct classification. However, an alternative approach to select a manufacturing process for a new design involves identifying previously produced parts with comparable shapes and materials and learning from them. Finding similar designs from a large dataset of previously manufactured parts is a challenging problem. To solve this problem, researchers have proposed different spatial and spectral shape descriptors to extract shape features including the D2 distribution, spherical harmonics (SH), and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), as well as the application of different machine learning methods on various representations of 3D part models like multi-view images, voxel, triangle mesh, and point cloud. However, there has not been a comprehensive analysis of these different shape descriptors, especially for part similarity search aimed at manufacturing process selection. To remedy this gap, this paper presents an in-depth comparative study of these shape descriptors for part similarity search. While we acknowledge the importance of factors like part size, tolerance, and cost in manufacturing process selection, this paper focuses on part shape and material properties only. Our findings show that SH performs the best among non-machine learning methods for manufacturing process selection, yielding 97.96% testing accuracy using the proposed quantitative evaluation metric. For machine learning methods, deep learning on multi-view image representations is best, yielding 99.85% testing accuracy when rotational invariance is not a primary concern. Deep learning on point cloud representations excels, yielding 99.44% testing accuracy when considering rotational invariance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 工程技术-工程:制造
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
9.60%
发文量
171
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nonlinear Engineering aims to be a platform for sharing original research results in theoretical, experimental, practical, and applied nonlinear phenomena within engineering. It serves as a forum to exchange ideas and applications of nonlinear problems across various engineering disciplines. Articles are considered for publication if they explore nonlinearities in engineering systems, offering realistic mathematical modeling, utilizing nonlinearity for new designs, stabilizing systems, understanding system behavior through nonlinearity, optimizing systems based on nonlinear interactions, and developing algorithms to harness and leverage nonlinear elements.
期刊最新文献
Industrial vision inspection using digital twins: bridging CAD models and realistic scenarios Reliability-improved machine learning model using knowledge-embedded learning approach for smart manufacturing Smart scheduling for next generation manufacturing systems: a systematic literature review An overview of traditional and advanced methods to detect part defects in additive manufacturing processes A systematic multi-layer cognitive model for intelligent machine tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1