Raghavendra Prasad, Shashikanta Tarai, Arindam Bit
{"title":"通过基于回归的机器学习模型研究情绪反应及其对注意力-情绪互动神经回路的影响","authors":"Raghavendra Prasad, Shashikanta Tarai, Arindam Bit","doi":"10.1007/s11571-024-10106-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Attentional paradigm can have a significant influence on the processing and experience of positive and negative emotions. Attentional mechanism refers to the tendency to selectively attend to a particular stimulus while ignoring others. In the context of emotions, individuals may exhibit attentional biases towards either positive or negative emotional stimuli. By directing attention towards a specific stimulus, individuals can modulate their emotional responses. When attention is directed towards negative or threatening stimuli, it can intensify negative emotions such as fear, sadness, anger and anxiety. Conversely, directing attention away from negative stimuli can reduce emotional reactivity and promote emotional regulation. Similarly, paying attention to positive stimuli can amplify positive emotions and facilitate positive emotional experiences. Attentional paradigms are also responsible for cognitive appraisal of emotional stimuli. The allocation of attention can shape how emotional stimuli are evaluated and categorized, influencing the subsequent emotional response. Since the relationship between attention and emotions is complex and can vary across individuals and contexts, it is important to understand the underlying cognitive neural dynamics of the same. Custom rank allocation model (CRAM) was used to decode the underlying neural dynamics of cognitive and emotional resource sharing through the non-significant EEG channels. During the main effect of global–local (GL), CRAM ranks and scores indicated that the EEG channels C4, PZ, OZ, and P4 were found to be the most non-significant channels. Similarly, CRAM ranks and scores of the interaction effects between global–local and positive emotion-negative emotion and the interaction effects between global–local and frequent-deviant-equal indicated midline central EEG channels CZ, PZ, FZ and OZ to be the main contributor of the cognitive and emotional resources to others. Understanding the dynamics of attention-emotion conflicts with reference to significant and non-significant channels is important to gain insights into the complex computational interplay between attention and emotion, leading to a deeper understanding of human cognition and emotion regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"251 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional reactivity and its impact on neural circuitry for attention-emotion interaction through regression-based machine learning model\",\"authors\":\"Raghavendra Prasad, Shashikanta Tarai, Arindam Bit\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11571-024-10106-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Attentional paradigm can have a significant influence on the processing and experience of positive and negative emotions. Attentional mechanism refers to the tendency to selectively attend to a particular stimulus while ignoring others. In the context of emotions, individuals may exhibit attentional biases towards either positive or negative emotional stimuli. By directing attention towards a specific stimulus, individuals can modulate their emotional responses. When attention is directed towards negative or threatening stimuli, it can intensify negative emotions such as fear, sadness, anger and anxiety. Conversely, directing attention away from negative stimuli can reduce emotional reactivity and promote emotional regulation. Similarly, paying attention to positive stimuli can amplify positive emotions and facilitate positive emotional experiences. Attentional paradigms are also responsible for cognitive appraisal of emotional stimuli. The allocation of attention can shape how emotional stimuli are evaluated and categorized, influencing the subsequent emotional response. Since the relationship between attention and emotions is complex and can vary across individuals and contexts, it is important to understand the underlying cognitive neural dynamics of the same. Custom rank allocation model (CRAM) was used to decode the underlying neural dynamics of cognitive and emotional resource sharing through the non-significant EEG channels. During the main effect of global–local (GL), CRAM ranks and scores indicated that the EEG channels C4, PZ, OZ, and P4 were found to be the most non-significant channels. Similarly, CRAM ranks and scores of the interaction effects between global–local and positive emotion-negative emotion and the interaction effects between global–local and frequent-deviant-equal indicated midline central EEG channels CZ, PZ, FZ and OZ to be the main contributor of the cognitive and emotional resources to others. Understanding the dynamics of attention-emotion conflicts with reference to significant and non-significant channels is important to gain insights into the complex computational interplay between attention and emotion, leading to a deeper understanding of human cognition and emotion regulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"volume\":\"251 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10106-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10106-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Emotional reactivity and its impact on neural circuitry for attention-emotion interaction through regression-based machine learning model
Attentional paradigm can have a significant influence on the processing and experience of positive and negative emotions. Attentional mechanism refers to the tendency to selectively attend to a particular stimulus while ignoring others. In the context of emotions, individuals may exhibit attentional biases towards either positive or negative emotional stimuli. By directing attention towards a specific stimulus, individuals can modulate their emotional responses. When attention is directed towards negative or threatening stimuli, it can intensify negative emotions such as fear, sadness, anger and anxiety. Conversely, directing attention away from negative stimuli can reduce emotional reactivity and promote emotional regulation. Similarly, paying attention to positive stimuli can amplify positive emotions and facilitate positive emotional experiences. Attentional paradigms are also responsible for cognitive appraisal of emotional stimuli. The allocation of attention can shape how emotional stimuli are evaluated and categorized, influencing the subsequent emotional response. Since the relationship between attention and emotions is complex and can vary across individuals and contexts, it is important to understand the underlying cognitive neural dynamics of the same. Custom rank allocation model (CRAM) was used to decode the underlying neural dynamics of cognitive and emotional resource sharing through the non-significant EEG channels. During the main effect of global–local (GL), CRAM ranks and scores indicated that the EEG channels C4, PZ, OZ, and P4 were found to be the most non-significant channels. Similarly, CRAM ranks and scores of the interaction effects between global–local and positive emotion-negative emotion and the interaction effects between global–local and frequent-deviant-equal indicated midline central EEG channels CZ, PZ, FZ and OZ to be the main contributor of the cognitive and emotional resources to others. Understanding the dynamics of attention-emotion conflicts with reference to significant and non-significant channels is important to gain insights into the complex computational interplay between attention and emotion, leading to a deeper understanding of human cognition and emotion regulation.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models.
The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome.
The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged.
1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics.
2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages.
3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.