社交媒体平台竞争中的互动质量

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of Network Economics Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1515/rne-2023-0068
Ido Eisdorfer
{"title":"社交媒体平台竞争中的互动质量","authors":"Ido Eisdorfer","doi":"10.1515/rne-2023-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media platforms are content-based platforms in which agents invest efforts to produce and share content while interacting with one another. The central question involves the trade-off between interaction quantity and content quality, and its impact on competition between an incumbent platform with a focal advantage and a high-quality new entrant seeking market entry. The study focuses on an agent’s utility function, examining the interplay between these factors and exploring strategies for platform decision-makers to maximize profits and benefits for their agents. The findings show that a high-quality non-focal platform has a strategic advantage in winning the market when agents prioritize content quality over the quantity of interactions. Policymakers should take into account the quality-driven impact on market efficiency and entry barriers.","PeriodicalId":45659,"journal":{"name":"Review of Network Economics","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quality of Interactions in Competition Between Social Media Platforms\",\"authors\":\"Ido Eisdorfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/rne-2023-0068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social media platforms are content-based platforms in which agents invest efforts to produce and share content while interacting with one another. The central question involves the trade-off between interaction quantity and content quality, and its impact on competition between an incumbent platform with a focal advantage and a high-quality new entrant seeking market entry. The study focuses on an agent’s utility function, examining the interplay between these factors and exploring strategies for platform decision-makers to maximize profits and benefits for their agents. The findings show that a high-quality non-focal platform has a strategic advantage in winning the market when agents prioritize content quality over the quantity of interactions. Policymakers should take into account the quality-driven impact on market efficiency and entry barriers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Network Economics\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Network Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2023-0068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Network Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2023-0068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体平台是以内容为基础的平台,在这个平台上,参与者在相互交流的同时,也在努力生产和分享内容。核心问题涉及互动数量和内容质量之间的权衡,及其对具有焦点优势的现有平台和寻求进入市场的高质量新平台之间竞争的影响。研究重点是代理人的效用函数,考察这些因素之间的相互作用,并探讨平台决策者为其代理人实现利润和利益最大化的策略。研究结果表明,当代理商优先考虑内容质量而非互动数量时,高质量的非焦点平台在赢得市场方面具有战略优势。政策制定者应考虑到质量驱动对市场效率和进入壁垒的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Quality of Interactions in Competition Between Social Media Platforms
Social media platforms are content-based platforms in which agents invest efforts to produce and share content while interacting with one another. The central question involves the trade-off between interaction quantity and content quality, and its impact on competition between an incumbent platform with a focal advantage and a high-quality new entrant seeking market entry. The study focuses on an agent’s utility function, examining the interplay between these factors and exploring strategies for platform decision-makers to maximize profits and benefits for their agents. The findings show that a high-quality non-focal platform has a strategic advantage in winning the market when agents prioritize content quality over the quantity of interactions. Policymakers should take into account the quality-driven impact on market efficiency and entry barriers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Review of Network Economics seeks to help policy makers, academics, and practitioners keep informed of new research and policy debate in network economics and related subjects that are relevant to the study of network industries. By publishing high quality research on topical issues relevant to network industries, it is hoped readers will be able to gain a deeper understanding of the economic issues involved and that this will improve the quality of decision making by private and public organisations, and debate among researchers. The articles can cover specific network industries, or may deal with general issues that have relevance to a number of different network industries, including topics in the economics of networks, regulation, competition law, or industrial organisation. Papers that provide insights into policy debates are especially welcome, as are up-to-date surveys, book reviews, and comments.
期刊最新文献
Reform, Not Revolution, is What is Needed Now for Yardstick Competition The Quality of Interactions in Competition Between Social Media Platforms Mixed Bundling and Mergers Price-Cap Regulation of Firms That Supply Their Rivals A Signaling Theory of the Online Consumer Review Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1