设备关闭后左心房阑尾通畅度的预后影响

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.123.013579
Mu Chen, Peng-Cheng Yao, Zhen-Tao Fei, Qun-Shan Wang, Yi-Chi Yu, Peng-Pai Zhang, Wei Li, Rui Zhang, Bin-Feng Mo, Ming-Zhe Zhao, Yi Yu, Mei Yang, Yan Zhao, Chang-Qi Gong, Jian Sun, Yi-Gang Li
{"title":"设备关闭后左心房阑尾通畅度的预后影响","authors":"Mu Chen, Peng-Cheng Yao, Zhen-Tao Fei, Qun-Shan Wang, Yi-Chi Yu, Peng-Pai Zhang, Wei Li, Rui Zhang, Bin-Feng Mo, Ming-Zhe Zhao, Yi Yu, Mei Yang, Yan Zhao, Chang-Qi Gong, Jian Sun, Yi-Gang Li","doi":"10.1161/circinterventions.123.013579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND:The prognostic impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) patency, including those with and without visible peri-device leak (PDL), post–LAA closure in patients with atrial fibrillation, remains elusive.METHODS:Patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with the WATCHMAN 2.5 device were prospectively enrolled. The device surveillance by cardiac computed tomography angiography was performed at 3 months post-procedure. Adverse events, including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and the combined major adverse events (MAEs), were compared between patients with complete closure and LAA patency.RESULTS:Among 519 patients with cardiac computed tomography angiography surveillance at 3 months post–LAA closure, 271 (52.2%) showed complete closure, and LAA patency was detected in 248 (47.8%) patients, including 196 (37.8%) with visible PDL and 52 (10.0%) without visible PDL. During a median of 1193 (787–1543) days follow-up, the presence of LAA patency was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (adjusted hazard ratio for baseline differences, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.17–8.83]; <i>P</i>=0.023) and MAEs (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06–1.17]; <i>P</i>=0.003). Specifically, LAA patency with visible PDL was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (hazard ratio, 3.66 [95% CI, 1.29–10.42]; <i>P</i>=0.015) and MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.71 [95% CI, 1.71–8.07]; <i>P</i>=0.001), although LAA patency without visible PDL showed higher risks of MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.59 [95% CI, 1.28–10.09]; <i>P</i>=0.015). Incidences of stroke/TIA (2.8% versus 3.0% versus 6.7% versus 22.2%; <i>P</i>=0.010), cardiovascular death (0.9% versus 0% versus 1.7% versus 11.1%; <i>P</i>=0.005), and MAEs (4.6% versus 9.0% versus 11.7% versus 22.2%; <i>P</i>=0.017) increased with larger PDL (0, &gt;0 to ≤3, &gt;3 to ≤5, or &gt;5 mm). Older age and discontinuing antiplatelet therapy at 6 months were independent predictors of stroke/TIA and MAEs in patients with LAA patency.CONCLUSIONS:LAA patency detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography at 3 months post–LAA closure is associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with WATCHMAN 2.5 device.REGISTRATION:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03788941.","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Impact of Left Atrial Appendage Patency After Device Closure\",\"authors\":\"Mu Chen, Peng-Cheng Yao, Zhen-Tao Fei, Qun-Shan Wang, Yi-Chi Yu, Peng-Pai Zhang, Wei Li, Rui Zhang, Bin-Feng Mo, Ming-Zhe Zhao, Yi Yu, Mei Yang, Yan Zhao, Chang-Qi Gong, Jian Sun, Yi-Gang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/circinterventions.123.013579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND:The prognostic impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) patency, including those with and without visible peri-device leak (PDL), post–LAA closure in patients with atrial fibrillation, remains elusive.METHODS:Patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with the WATCHMAN 2.5 device were prospectively enrolled. The device surveillance by cardiac computed tomography angiography was performed at 3 months post-procedure. Adverse events, including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and the combined major adverse events (MAEs), were compared between patients with complete closure and LAA patency.RESULTS:Among 519 patients with cardiac computed tomography angiography surveillance at 3 months post–LAA closure, 271 (52.2%) showed complete closure, and LAA patency was detected in 248 (47.8%) patients, including 196 (37.8%) with visible PDL and 52 (10.0%) without visible PDL. During a median of 1193 (787–1543) days follow-up, the presence of LAA patency was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (adjusted hazard ratio for baseline differences, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.17–8.83]; <i>P</i>=0.023) and MAEs (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06–1.17]; <i>P</i>=0.003). Specifically, LAA patency with visible PDL was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (hazard ratio, 3.66 [95% CI, 1.29–10.42]; <i>P</i>=0.015) and MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.71 [95% CI, 1.71–8.07]; <i>P</i>=0.001), although LAA patency without visible PDL showed higher risks of MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.59 [95% CI, 1.28–10.09]; <i>P</i>=0.015). Incidences of stroke/TIA (2.8% versus 3.0% versus 6.7% versus 22.2%; <i>P</i>=0.010), cardiovascular death (0.9% versus 0% versus 1.7% versus 11.1%; <i>P</i>=0.005), and MAEs (4.6% versus 9.0% versus 11.7% versus 22.2%; <i>P</i>=0.017) increased with larger PDL (0, &gt;0 to ≤3, &gt;3 to ≤5, or &gt;5 mm). Older age and discontinuing antiplatelet therapy at 6 months were independent predictors of stroke/TIA and MAEs in patients with LAA patency.CONCLUSIONS:LAA patency detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography at 3 months post–LAA closure is associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with WATCHMAN 2.5 device.REGISTRATION:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03788941.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.123.013579\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.123.013579","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心房颤动患者左心房阑尾(LAA)闭合后,左心房阑尾(LAA)通畅性(包括有和无可见的装置周围泄漏(PDL))对预后的影响仍不明确。方法:前瞻性地招募了植入 WATCHMAN 2.5 装置的心房颤动患者。术后 3 个月通过心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影对装置进行监测。比较了完全闭合患者和 LAA 通畅患者的不良事件,包括中风/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、大出血、心血管死亡、全因死亡和合并主要不良事件(MAEs)。结果:在LAA关闭术后3个月接受心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影监测的519名患者中,271人(52.2%)显示完全关闭,248人(47.8%)检测到LAA通畅,其中196人(37.8%)有可见PDL,52人(10.0%)无可见PDL。在中位 1193 (787-1543) 天的随访中,LAA 通畅与卒中/TIA 风险增加相关(基线差异调整后危险比为 3.22 [95% CI, 1.17-8.83];P=0.023)和 MAEs 风险增加相关(调整后危险比为 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.17];P=0.003)。具体而言,可见 PDL 的 LAA 闭塞与卒中/TIA(危险比,3.66 [95% CI,1.29-10.42];P=0.015)和 MAEs(危险比,3.71 [95% CI,1.71-8.07];P=0.001)风险增加相关,但无可见 PDL 的 LAA 闭塞显示 MAEs 风险更高(危险比,3.59 [95% CI,1.28-10.09];P=0.015)。卒中/TIA(2.8% 对 3.0% 对 6.7% 对 22.2%;P=0.010)、心血管死亡(0.9% 对 0% 对 1.7% 对 11.1%;P=0.005)和 MAEs(4.6% 对 9.0% 对 11.7% 对 22.2%;P=0.017)的发生率随 PDL 的增大而增加(0、>0 至≤3、>3 至≤5 或 >5 mm)。结论:通过心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影检查发现,LAA闭合后3个月的LAA通畅与植入WATCHMAN 2.5设备的心房颤动患者的不良预后有关。REGISTRATION:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier.NCT03788941:NCT03788941。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic Impact of Left Atrial Appendage Patency After Device Closure
BACKGROUND:The prognostic impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) patency, including those with and without visible peri-device leak (PDL), post–LAA closure in patients with atrial fibrillation, remains elusive.METHODS:Patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with the WATCHMAN 2.5 device were prospectively enrolled. The device surveillance by cardiac computed tomography angiography was performed at 3 months post-procedure. Adverse events, including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and the combined major adverse events (MAEs), were compared between patients with complete closure and LAA patency.RESULTS:Among 519 patients with cardiac computed tomography angiography surveillance at 3 months post–LAA closure, 271 (52.2%) showed complete closure, and LAA patency was detected in 248 (47.8%) patients, including 196 (37.8%) with visible PDL and 52 (10.0%) without visible PDL. During a median of 1193 (787–1543) days follow-up, the presence of LAA patency was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (adjusted hazard ratio for baseline differences, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.17–8.83]; P=0.023) and MAEs (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06–1.17]; P=0.003). Specifically, LAA patency with visible PDL was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (hazard ratio, 3.66 [95% CI, 1.29–10.42]; P=0.015) and MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.71 [95% CI, 1.71–8.07]; P=0.001), although LAA patency without visible PDL showed higher risks of MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.59 [95% CI, 1.28–10.09]; P=0.015). Incidences of stroke/TIA (2.8% versus 3.0% versus 6.7% versus 22.2%; P=0.010), cardiovascular death (0.9% versus 0% versus 1.7% versus 11.1%; P=0.005), and MAEs (4.6% versus 9.0% versus 11.7% versus 22.2%; P=0.017) increased with larger PDL (0, >0 to ≤3, >3 to ≤5, or >5 mm). Older age and discontinuing antiplatelet therapy at 6 months were independent predictors of stroke/TIA and MAEs in patients with LAA patency.CONCLUSIONS:LAA patency detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography at 3 months post–LAA closure is associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with WATCHMAN 2.5 device.REGISTRATION:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03788941.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Coronary Revascularization Decisions: The Promising Role of Large Language Models as a Decision-Support Tool for Multidisciplinary Heart Team. Impact of a Chronic Total Occlusion on Outcomes After FFR-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery: A FAME 3 Substudy. Large Language Models and Revascularization Decisions: The Newest Member of Your Multidisciplinary Heart Team? Relative Benefit of Dual Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Oral Anticoagulation According to Time After ACS and PCI: Insights From the AUGUSTUS Trial. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Annular Reduction by Cinching With TEER in the Commissure (ARCTIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1