评估直肠癌切除术后手术效果的种族/民族差异:ACS-NSQIP 分析

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100248
Carolina Vigna, Ana Sofia Ore, Anne Fabrizio, Evangelos Messaris
{"title":"评估直肠癌切除术后手术效果的种族/民族差异:ACS-NSQIP 分析","authors":"Carolina Vigna,&nbsp;Ana Sofia Ore,&nbsp;Anne Fabrizio,&nbsp;Evangelos Messaris","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disparities exist the management of rectal cancer. We sought to evaluate short-term surgical outcomes among different racial/ethnic groups following rectal cancer resection.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2016–2019) was queried. Patients undergoing rectal cancer resection were categorized by race/ethnicity. Circumferential resection margin positivity rate and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1,753 patients, 80.2 % were White, 7.6 % Black, 8.5 % Asian and 3.7 % Hispanic. On unadjusted analysis, Hispanic patients presented longer operative time(<em>p</em> = 0.029), and Black patients higher postoperative ileus(<em>p</em> = 0.003) and readmission(<em>p</em> = 0.023) rates. After PSM, Hispanics had a significantly higher circumferential resection margin positivity rate(<em>p</em> = 0.032), Black patients higher postoperative ileus rate(<em>p</em> = 0.014) and longer LOS(<em>p</em> = 0.0118) when compared to White counterparts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Racial disparities were found in short-term postoperative outcomes. Hispanic patients presented higher margin positivity rate and Black patients worst 30-day postoperative outcomes. Comparative studies evaluating trends and a higher number of minority patients included in databases are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000159/pdfft?md5=b8c6b9dcb291130b1c29412c364bcf2f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000159-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of racial/ethnic disparities in surgical outcomes after rectal cancer resection: An ACS-NSQIP analysis\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Vigna,&nbsp;Ana Sofia Ore,&nbsp;Anne Fabrizio,&nbsp;Evangelos Messaris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disparities exist the management of rectal cancer. We sought to evaluate short-term surgical outcomes among different racial/ethnic groups following rectal cancer resection.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2016–2019) was queried. Patients undergoing rectal cancer resection were categorized by race/ethnicity. Circumferential resection margin positivity rate and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1,753 patients, 80.2 % were White, 7.6 % Black, 8.5 % Asian and 3.7 % Hispanic. On unadjusted analysis, Hispanic patients presented longer operative time(<em>p</em> = 0.029), and Black patients higher postoperative ileus(<em>p</em> = 0.003) and readmission(<em>p</em> = 0.023) rates. After PSM, Hispanics had a significantly higher circumferential resection margin positivity rate(<em>p</em> = 0.032), Black patients higher postoperative ileus rate(<em>p</em> = 0.014) and longer LOS(<em>p</em> = 0.0118) when compared to White counterparts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Racial disparities were found in short-term postoperative outcomes. Hispanic patients presented higher margin positivity rate and Black patients worst 30-day postoperative outcomes. Comparative studies evaluating trends and a higher number of minority patients included in databases are warranted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000159/pdfft?md5=b8c6b9dcb291130b1c29412c364bcf2f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000159-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景直肠癌的治疗存在差异。我们试图评估不同种族/族裔群体在直肠癌切除术后的短期手术效果。材料与方法查询了国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库(2016-2019 年)。按种族/民族对接受直肠癌切除术的患者进行分类。对环形切除边缘阳性率和术后结果进行了评估。结果 在1753名患者中,白人占80.2%,黑人占7.6%,亚裔占8.5%,西班牙裔占3.7%。在未经调整的分析中,西班牙裔患者的手术时间更长(p = 0.029),黑人患者的术后回肠梗阻(p = 0.003)和再入院(p = 0.023)率更高。在 PSM 术后,与白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者的周缘切除边缘阳性率明显更高(p = 0.032),黑人患者的术后回肠率更高(p = 0.014),住院时间更长(p = 0.0118)。西班牙裔患者的边缘阳性率较高,黑人患者的术后 30 天预后最差。有必要进行比较研究,评估趋势并将更多的少数族裔患者纳入数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of racial/ethnic disparities in surgical outcomes after rectal cancer resection: An ACS-NSQIP analysis

Background

Disparities exist the management of rectal cancer. We sought to evaluate short-term surgical outcomes among different racial/ethnic groups following rectal cancer resection.

Materials and Methods

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2016–2019) was queried. Patients undergoing rectal cancer resection were categorized by race/ethnicity. Circumferential resection margin positivity rate and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used.

Results

Of 1,753 patients, 80.2 % were White, 7.6 % Black, 8.5 % Asian and 3.7 % Hispanic. On unadjusted analysis, Hispanic patients presented longer operative time(p = 0.029), and Black patients higher postoperative ileus(p = 0.003) and readmission(p = 0.023) rates. After PSM, Hispanics had a significantly higher circumferential resection margin positivity rate(p = 0.032), Black patients higher postoperative ileus rate(p = 0.014) and longer LOS(p = 0.0118) when compared to White counterparts.

Conclusion

Racial disparities were found in short-term postoperative outcomes. Hispanic patients presented higher margin positivity rate and Black patients worst 30-day postoperative outcomes. Comparative studies evaluating trends and a higher number of minority patients included in databases are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review Letter to the Editor on “The pulmonary contusion score: Development of asimple scoring system for blunt lung injury” Prevalence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain in adult surgical patients: A prospective study Advances and results in omental patch repair of gastrointestinal perforations: A narrative review Practical evaluation of risk factors in patients with osteoporosis-induced thoracic and lumbar vertebral compression fractures requiring surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1