用微型机械管理甘蔗中的杂草

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Sugar Tech Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1007/s12355-024-01405-0
J. Chetty, A. Mansuy, M. Christina
{"title":"用微型机械管理甘蔗中的杂草","authors":"J. Chetty,&nbsp;A. Mansuy,&nbsp;M. Christina","doi":"10.1007/s12355-024-01405-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Micro-mechanization is a promising method for limiting herbicides in sugarcane. Three experimental trials were carried out to assess the effectiveness and impact on yield of 4 inter-row weeding tools between 2017 and 2021 in La Reunion (a rotary slasher, a mower shredder, a power harrow, and a duck-foot cultivator). Mechanical inter-row weeding allows us to reduce the treatment frequency index by 50%. To assess the effectiveness of the tools, we analyzed the difference in weed ground coverage (ΔCOV) before and after an intervention (weeding). Between 0 and 30 days, the efficiency of the tools was comparable to chemical treatment, with an average efficiency of 70%, except for the duck-foot cultivator in ratoon (ΔCOV = 20%). After 30 days, ΔCOV was negative for the tools studied (power harrow and mower shredder), reflecting weed contamination of the plot, in contrast to chemical weed control (ΔCOV = 81%). Yield analysis showed a significant drop of 10% for the rotary slasher and/or the mower shredder compared with the reference control. An overall downward trend was observed for the other modalities (5%), but further studies are needed to assess their impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"26 6","pages":"1771 - 1779"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micro-Mechanization to Manage Weed in Sugar Cane\",\"authors\":\"J. Chetty,&nbsp;A. Mansuy,&nbsp;M. Christina\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12355-024-01405-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Micro-mechanization is a promising method for limiting herbicides in sugarcane. Three experimental trials were carried out to assess the effectiveness and impact on yield of 4 inter-row weeding tools between 2017 and 2021 in La Reunion (a rotary slasher, a mower shredder, a power harrow, and a duck-foot cultivator). Mechanical inter-row weeding allows us to reduce the treatment frequency index by 50%. To assess the effectiveness of the tools, we analyzed the difference in weed ground coverage (ΔCOV) before and after an intervention (weeding). Between 0 and 30 days, the efficiency of the tools was comparable to chemical treatment, with an average efficiency of 70%, except for the duck-foot cultivator in ratoon (ΔCOV = 20%). After 30 days, ΔCOV was negative for the tools studied (power harrow and mower shredder), reflecting weed contamination of the plot, in contrast to chemical weed control (ΔCOV = 81%). Yield analysis showed a significant drop of 10% for the rotary slasher and/or the mower shredder compared with the reference control. An overall downward trend was observed for the other modalities (5%), but further studies are needed to assess their impact.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sugar Tech\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"1771 - 1779\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sugar Tech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-024-01405-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-024-01405-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微机械化是限制甘蔗使用除草剂的一种有前途的方法。2017 年至 2021 年期间,在留尼旺岛进行了三项试验,以评估 4 种行间除草工具(旋耕刀、割草粉碎机、动力耙和鸭脚式耕作机)的效果及其对产量的影响。通过机械行间除草,我们可以将处理频率指数降低 50%。为了评估这些工具的效果,我们分析了干预(除草)前后杂草地面覆盖率的差异(ΔCOV)。在 0 至 30 天期间,除鸭脚木耕作机(ΔCOV = 20%)外,其他工具的效率与化学处理相当,平均效率为 70%。30 天后,研究工具(动力耙和割草机)的 ΔCOV 为负值,反映了地块的杂草污染情况,与化学除草(ΔCOV = 81%)形成鲜明对比。产量分析表明,与参照对照组相比,旋转式切碎机和/或割草机切碎机的产量大幅下降了 10%。其他方式总体呈下降趋势(5%),但需要进一步研究以评估其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Micro-Mechanization to Manage Weed in Sugar Cane

Micro-mechanization is a promising method for limiting herbicides in sugarcane. Three experimental trials were carried out to assess the effectiveness and impact on yield of 4 inter-row weeding tools between 2017 and 2021 in La Reunion (a rotary slasher, a mower shredder, a power harrow, and a duck-foot cultivator). Mechanical inter-row weeding allows us to reduce the treatment frequency index by 50%. To assess the effectiveness of the tools, we analyzed the difference in weed ground coverage (ΔCOV) before and after an intervention (weeding). Between 0 and 30 days, the efficiency of the tools was comparable to chemical treatment, with an average efficiency of 70%, except for the duck-foot cultivator in ratoon (ΔCOV = 20%). After 30 days, ΔCOV was negative for the tools studied (power harrow and mower shredder), reflecting weed contamination of the plot, in contrast to chemical weed control (ΔCOV = 81%). Yield analysis showed a significant drop of 10% for the rotary slasher and/or the mower shredder compared with the reference control. An overall downward trend was observed for the other modalities (5%), but further studies are needed to assess their impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
期刊最新文献
Current Status and Prospects of the Global Sugar Beet Industry Sugar Beet Special Issue: Biotechnology and Breeding Techniques for Stress-Resistant Sugar Beet Genome-Wide Identification of the BvHSFs Gene Family and Their Expression in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Under Salt Stress Effects of Different Irrigation and Fertilization Levels on the Yield and Quality of Wet Sugar Beet Pulp Used as Animal Feed Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhance Tolerance to Drought Stress by Altering the Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Sugar Beet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1