利用机器学习预测标准普尔 500 指数股票的相对回报率

IF 6.9 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Financial Innovation Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1186/s40854-024-00644-0
Htet Htet Htun, Michael Biehl, Nicolai Petkov
{"title":"利用机器学习预测标准普尔 500 指数股票的相对回报率","authors":"Htet Htet Htun, Michael Biehl, Nicolai Petkov","doi":"10.1186/s40854-024-00644-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forecasting changes in stock prices is extremely challenging given that numerous factors cause these prices to fluctuate. The random walk hypothesis and efficient market hypothesis essentially state that it is not possible to systematically, reliably predict future stock prices or forecast changes in the stock market overall. Nonetheless, machine learning (ML) techniques that use historical data have been applied to make such predictions. Previous studies focused on a small number of stocks and claimed success with limited statistical confidence. In this study, we construct feature vectors composed of multiple previous relative returns and apply the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and long short-term memory (LSTM) ML methods as classifiers to predict whether a stock can return 2% more than its index in the following 10 days. We apply this approach to all S&P 500 companies for the period 2017–2022. We assess performance using accuracy, precision, and recall and compare our results with a random choice strategy. We observe that the LSTM classifier outperforms RF and SVM, and the data-driven ML methods outperform the random choice classifier (p = 8.46e−17 for accuracy of LSTM). Thus, we demonstrate that the probability that the random walk and efficient market hypotheses hold in the considered context is negligibly small.","PeriodicalId":37175,"journal":{"name":"Financial Innovation","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forecasting relative returns for S&P 500 stocks using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Htet Htet Htun, Michael Biehl, Nicolai Petkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40854-024-00644-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forecasting changes in stock prices is extremely challenging given that numerous factors cause these prices to fluctuate. The random walk hypothesis and efficient market hypothesis essentially state that it is not possible to systematically, reliably predict future stock prices or forecast changes in the stock market overall. Nonetheless, machine learning (ML) techniques that use historical data have been applied to make such predictions. Previous studies focused on a small number of stocks and claimed success with limited statistical confidence. In this study, we construct feature vectors composed of multiple previous relative returns and apply the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and long short-term memory (LSTM) ML methods as classifiers to predict whether a stock can return 2% more than its index in the following 10 days. We apply this approach to all S&P 500 companies for the period 2017–2022. We assess performance using accuracy, precision, and recall and compare our results with a random choice strategy. We observe that the LSTM classifier outperforms RF and SVM, and the data-driven ML methods outperform the random choice classifier (p = 8.46e−17 for accuracy of LSTM). Thus, we demonstrate that the probability that the random walk and efficient market hypotheses hold in the considered context is negligibly small.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Innovation\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00644-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00644-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于导致股票价格波动的因素众多,因此预测股票价格的变化极具挑战性。随机漫步假说和有效市场假说的本质是,不可能系统、可靠地预测未来股票价格或预测股市的整体变化。然而,使用历史数据的机器学习(ML)技术已被用于进行此类预测。以前的研究主要集中在少数股票上,并声称取得了成功,但统计置信度有限。在本研究中,我们构建了由之前多个相对回报率组成的特征向量,并应用随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和长短期记忆(LSTM)ML 方法作为分类器,来预测一只股票在接下来的 10 天内的回报率是否能比其指数高出 2%。我们将这种方法应用于 2017-2022 年期间的所有标准普尔 500 指数公司。我们使用准确率、精确度和召回率评估性能,并将结果与随机选择策略进行比较。我们发现,LSTM 分类器的表现优于 RF 和 SVM,而数据驱动的 ML 方法的表现优于随机选择分类器(LSTM 的准确率 p = 8.46e-17)。因此,我们证明,在所考虑的情况下,随机漫步和有效市场假说成立的概率小到可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forecasting relative returns for S&P 500 stocks using machine learning
Forecasting changes in stock prices is extremely challenging given that numerous factors cause these prices to fluctuate. The random walk hypothesis and efficient market hypothesis essentially state that it is not possible to systematically, reliably predict future stock prices or forecast changes in the stock market overall. Nonetheless, machine learning (ML) techniques that use historical data have been applied to make such predictions. Previous studies focused on a small number of stocks and claimed success with limited statistical confidence. In this study, we construct feature vectors composed of multiple previous relative returns and apply the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and long short-term memory (LSTM) ML methods as classifiers to predict whether a stock can return 2% more than its index in the following 10 days. We apply this approach to all S&P 500 companies for the period 2017–2022. We assess performance using accuracy, precision, and recall and compare our results with a random choice strategy. We observe that the LSTM classifier outperforms RF and SVM, and the data-driven ML methods outperform the random choice classifier (p = 8.46e−17 for accuracy of LSTM). Thus, we demonstrate that the probability that the random walk and efficient market hypotheses hold in the considered context is negligibly small.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Innovation
Financial Innovation Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Financial Innovation (FIN), a Springer OA journal sponsored by Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, serves as a global academic platform for sharing research findings in all aspects of financial innovation during the electronic business era. It facilitates interactions among researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, focusing on new financial instruments, technologies, markets, and institutions. Emphasizing emerging financial products enabled by disruptive technologies, FIN publishes high-quality academic and practical papers. The journal is peer-reviewed, indexed in SSCI, Scopus, Google Scholar, CNKI, CQVIP, and more.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning in business and finance: a literature review and research opportunities Predictive crypto-asset automated market maker architecture for decentralized finance using deep reinforcement learning Cryptocurrencies under climate shocks: a dynamic network analysis of extreme risk spillovers Exploring the coherency and predictability between the stocks of artificial intelligence and energy corporations From CFOs to crypto: exploratory study unraveling factors in corporate adoption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1