挤压种子造粒为恢复受土传植物病原体影响的森林生态系统提供了另一种直接播种选择

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Ecological Management & Restoration Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1111/emr.12600
Himbutugoda S. Harshani, Treena Burgess, Giles Hardy, Todd E. Erickson
{"title":"挤压种子造粒为恢复受土传植物病原体影响的森林生态系统提供了另一种直接播种选择","authors":"Himbutugoda S. Harshani,&nbsp;Treena Burgess,&nbsp;Giles Hardy,&nbsp;Todd E. Erickson","doi":"10.1111/emr.12600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The high cost of native seeds and low seedling establishment percentages after seed broadcasting are major constraints for seed-based rehabilitation. This study examines whether extruded seed pelleting can be used as a tool to distribute seeds more effectively (e.g. distribute small seeds in a precise manner) while maintaining or enhancing seedling emergence and establishment of Australian shrub species used in the rehabilitation of <i>Phytophthora cinnamomi</i> infested Jarrah (<i>Eucalyptus marginata</i>) forest sites. Pellet formulation was first tested using five different formulations of dry ingredients and the addition of seeds from four <i>Phytophthora</i>-resistant species under glasshouse conditions. The best performing formulation from this work was then adopted to compare laboratory-produced and field-deployed pellets. Seedling emergence of the larger seeded species, Raspberry Jam Wattle (<i>Acacia acuminata</i>) and Pin-cushion Hakea (<i>Hakea laurina</i>), was highest using field-deployed pellets and emergence was statistically similar to the non-pelleted seeds. Seedling emergence reached 100% for the small seeded species, Silky-leaved Bold Flower (<i>Calothamnus sanguineus</i>) and <i>Melaleuca seriata</i>, from laboratory-produced pellets and was significantly higher than non-pelleted seeds. These results indicate that extruded pelleting offers an alternative direct seeding option that can result in greater or equal seedling emergence than that observed with non-pelleted seeds, yet the responses are species-specific. These species-specific pelleting techniques must now be tested under field conditions to confirm whether pellet production method and delivery improve seedling establishment under field conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12600","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extruded seed pelleting offers an alternative direct seeding option to rehabilitate forested ecosystems impacted by a soil-borne plant pathogen\",\"authors\":\"Himbutugoda S. Harshani,&nbsp;Treena Burgess,&nbsp;Giles Hardy,&nbsp;Todd E. Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emr.12600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The high cost of native seeds and low seedling establishment percentages after seed broadcasting are major constraints for seed-based rehabilitation. This study examines whether extruded seed pelleting can be used as a tool to distribute seeds more effectively (e.g. distribute small seeds in a precise manner) while maintaining or enhancing seedling emergence and establishment of Australian shrub species used in the rehabilitation of <i>Phytophthora cinnamomi</i> infested Jarrah (<i>Eucalyptus marginata</i>) forest sites. Pellet formulation was first tested using five different formulations of dry ingredients and the addition of seeds from four <i>Phytophthora</i>-resistant species under glasshouse conditions. The best performing formulation from this work was then adopted to compare laboratory-produced and field-deployed pellets. Seedling emergence of the larger seeded species, Raspberry Jam Wattle (<i>Acacia acuminata</i>) and Pin-cushion Hakea (<i>Hakea laurina</i>), was highest using field-deployed pellets and emergence was statistically similar to the non-pelleted seeds. Seedling emergence reached 100% for the small seeded species, Silky-leaved Bold Flower (<i>Calothamnus sanguineus</i>) and <i>Melaleuca seriata</i>, from laboratory-produced pellets and was significantly higher than non-pelleted seeds. These results indicate that extruded pelleting offers an alternative direct seeding option that can result in greater or equal seedling emergence than that observed with non-pelleted seeds, yet the responses are species-specific. These species-specific pelleting techniques must now be tested under field conditions to confirm whether pellet production method and delivery improve seedling establishment under field conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12600\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12600\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本地种子成本高,播种后成苗率低,这些都是基于种子的恢复工作的主要制约因素。本研究探讨了挤压种子制粒是否可作为一种工具,更有效地分发种子(例如,精确分发小粒种子),同时保持或提高澳大利亚灌木物种的出苗率和成苗率,用于恢复受 Phytophthora cinnamomi 侵染的贾拉(Eucalyptus marginata)林地。在玻璃温室条件下,首先使用五种不同配方的干燥成分和四种抗蚜虫物种的种子对颗粒配方进行了测试。然后采用这项工作中性能最好的配方来比较实验室生产的颗粒和实地部署的颗粒。较大的种子物种树莓果酱荆(Acacia acuminata)和松果菊(Hakea laurina)的出苗率使用田间投放的颗粒最高,出苗率在统计学上与未投放颗粒的种子相似。使用实验室生产的丸粒播种的小粒播种物种丝叶金雀花(Calothamnus sanguineus)和白千层(Melaleuca seriata)的出苗率达到 100%,显著高于非丸粒播种。这些结果表明,挤压造粒提供了另一种直接播种选择,其出苗率高于或等于未造粒种子的出苗率,但其反应具有物种特异性。现在必须在田间条件下测试这些针对特定物种的粒播技术,以确认粒播生产方法和输送方式是否能改善田间条件下的育苗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extruded seed pelleting offers an alternative direct seeding option to rehabilitate forested ecosystems impacted by a soil-borne plant pathogen

The high cost of native seeds and low seedling establishment percentages after seed broadcasting are major constraints for seed-based rehabilitation. This study examines whether extruded seed pelleting can be used as a tool to distribute seeds more effectively (e.g. distribute small seeds in a precise manner) while maintaining or enhancing seedling emergence and establishment of Australian shrub species used in the rehabilitation of Phytophthora cinnamomi infested Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest sites. Pellet formulation was first tested using five different formulations of dry ingredients and the addition of seeds from four Phytophthora-resistant species under glasshouse conditions. The best performing formulation from this work was then adopted to compare laboratory-produced and field-deployed pellets. Seedling emergence of the larger seeded species, Raspberry Jam Wattle (Acacia acuminata) and Pin-cushion Hakea (Hakea laurina), was highest using field-deployed pellets and emergence was statistically similar to the non-pelleted seeds. Seedling emergence reached 100% for the small seeded species, Silky-leaved Bold Flower (Calothamnus sanguineus) and Melaleuca seriata, from laboratory-produced pellets and was significantly higher than non-pelleted seeds. These results indicate that extruded pelleting offers an alternative direct seeding option that can result in greater or equal seedling emergence than that observed with non-pelleted seeds, yet the responses are species-specific. These species-specific pelleting techniques must now be tested under field conditions to confirm whether pellet production method and delivery improve seedling establishment under field conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Destocking waterways: Evidence that stocked Murray Cod (Maccullochella peelii) were extracted at pumped irrigation diversions within 24 hours of release Managing biodiversity on private land: Directions for collaboration through reconciliation ecology Mitigative translocation of Singleton Mint Bush (Prostanthera cineolifera) on the NSW North Coast: Effects of soil texture, horticultural practice and bushfire on the translocation outcome Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1