为什么人们总是想要更多?感知到的经济不平等加剧了人们的相对匮乏,从而导致人们变得贪婪

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1111/bjop.12706
Zhenzhen Liu, Xiaomin Sun, Ruiji Bao, Rongzi Ma
{"title":"为什么人们总是想要更多?感知到的经济不平等加剧了人们的相对匮乏,从而导致人们变得贪婪","authors":"Zhenzhen Liu, Xiaomin Sun, Ruiji Bao, Rongzi Ma","doi":"10.1111/bjop.12706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Greedy phenomena have dramatically increased in societies. However, despite the universality of greedy behaviour, empirical research on the causes of greed is scarce. In this context, we propose that perceived economic inequality may be an important factor influencing greed. Study 1 provided primary evidence of a positive relationship between perceived economic inequality and greed, based on data from a large‐scale social survey (CFPS 2018, <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 14,317). Employing well‐established questionnaires, Study 2A (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 200) and Study 2B (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 399) revealed that perceived economic inequality positively predicts greed, with relative deprivation playing a mediating role. Study 3A (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 200) and Study 3B (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 200) manipulated perceived economic inequality to provide causal evidence of its effects on greed and to replicate the mediating effect of relative deprivation. Finally, Study 4 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 372), using a blockage manipulation design, showed that the effect of perceived economic inequality on greed significantly decreases when relative deprivation is suppressed. In summary, the results of these six studies consistently suggest that perceived economic inequality positively affects greed and that this effect is mediated by relative deprivation.","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do people always want more? Perceived economic inequality leads people to be greedy by enhancing relative deprivation\",\"authors\":\"Zhenzhen Liu, Xiaomin Sun, Ruiji Bao, Rongzi Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjop.12706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Greedy phenomena have dramatically increased in societies. However, despite the universality of greedy behaviour, empirical research on the causes of greed is scarce. In this context, we propose that perceived economic inequality may be an important factor influencing greed. Study 1 provided primary evidence of a positive relationship between perceived economic inequality and greed, based on data from a large‐scale social survey (CFPS 2018, <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 14,317). Employing well‐established questionnaires, Study 2A (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 200) and Study 2B (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 399) revealed that perceived economic inequality positively predicts greed, with relative deprivation playing a mediating role. Study 3A (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 200) and Study 3B (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 200) manipulated perceived economic inequality to provide causal evidence of its effects on greed and to replicate the mediating effect of relative deprivation. Finally, Study 4 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 372), using a blockage manipulation design, showed that the effect of perceived economic inequality on greed significantly decreases when relative deprivation is suppressed. In summary, the results of these six studies consistently suggest that perceived economic inequality positively affects greed and that this effect is mediated by relative deprivation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12706\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贪婪现象在社会中急剧增加。然而,尽管贪婪行为具有普遍性,但有关贪婪原因的实证研究却很少。在这种情况下,我们提出,感知到的经济不平等可能是影响贪婪的一个重要因素。研究1基于大规模社会调查(CFPS 2018,N = 14,317)的数据,提供了感知到的经济不平等与贪婪之间存在正相关关系的主要证据。研究 2A(样本数=200)和研究 2B(样本数=399)采用成熟的调查问卷,揭示了感知到的经济不平等与贪婪之间的正向预测关系,而相对贫困则起到了中介作用。研究 3A(200 人)和研究 3B(200 人)对感知到的经济不平等进行了操作,以提供其对贪婪影响的因果证据,并复制了相对剥夺的中介效应。最后,研究 4(N = 372)采用阻断操纵设计,表明当相对剥夺受到抑制时,感知到的经济不平等对贪婪的影响会显著降低。总之,这六项研究的结果一致表明,感知到的经济不平等会对贪婪产生积极影响,而这种影响是由相对剥夺所中介的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why do people always want more? Perceived economic inequality leads people to be greedy by enhancing relative deprivation
Greedy phenomena have dramatically increased in societies. However, despite the universality of greedy behaviour, empirical research on the causes of greed is scarce. In this context, we propose that perceived economic inequality may be an important factor influencing greed. Study 1 provided primary evidence of a positive relationship between perceived economic inequality and greed, based on data from a large‐scale social survey (CFPS 2018, N = 14,317). Employing well‐established questionnaires, Study 2A (N = 200) and Study 2B (N = 399) revealed that perceived economic inequality positively predicts greed, with relative deprivation playing a mediating role. Study 3A (N = 200) and Study 3B (N = 200) manipulated perceived economic inequality to provide causal evidence of its effects on greed and to replicate the mediating effect of relative deprivation. Finally, Study 4 (N = 372), using a blockage manipulation design, showed that the effect of perceived economic inequality on greed significantly decreases when relative deprivation is suppressed. In summary, the results of these six studies consistently suggest that perceived economic inequality positively affects greed and that this effect is mediated by relative deprivation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking interplays between competitiveness, cooperativeness, and social comparison orientation: A network psychometric approach and replication Positive and negative touch differentially modulate metacognitive memory judgements for emotional stimuli People have different expectations for their own versus others' use of AI-mediated communication tools. Social sharing of emotion during the collective crisis of COVID-19. Mirroring brains: How we understand others from the inside By GiacomoRizzolatti, CorradoSinigaglia. Translated by Frances Andersen, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2023. Hardcover US$ 46.99. ISBN: 9780198871705
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1