评估在社区药房对老年人进行药物随访的可行性:随机对照试验

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1007/s11096-024-01711-3
Christina Malini Christopher, Ali Qais Blebil, KC Bhuvan, Deepa Alex, Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim, Norhasimah Ismail, Mark Wing Loong Cheong
{"title":"评估在社区药房对老年人进行药物随访的可行性:随机对照试验","authors":"Christina Malini Christopher, Ali Qais Blebil, KC Bhuvan, Deepa Alex, Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim, Norhasimah Ismail, Mark Wing Loong Cheong","doi":"10.1007/s11096-024-01711-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Medication review with follow-up is essential for optimising medication utilisation among the older adult population in primary healthcare.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing medication reviews with follow-up for older adults in community pharmacies and examined potential outcomes on medication use.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>A pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted with 4 cluster-randomised community pharmacies to assess the feasibility of the intervention. Two community pharmacies served as intervention and control groups. Both groups recruited older adults over 60 who were followed over 6 months. The translated Medication use Questionnaire (MedUseQ) was administered at baseline and 6 months for both groups. The outcomes were to assess the feasibility of conducting medication review with follow-up and the probable medication use outcomes from the intervention.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The intervention and control groups comprised 14 and 13 older adults. A total of 35 recommendations were made by pharmacists in the intervention group and 8 in the control group. MedUseQ was easily administered, providing some evidence the feasibility of the intervention. However, there were feasibility challenges such as a lack of pharmacists, collaborative practice, difficulties with the tool language, time constraints, and limited funds. Questionnaire results provided a signal of improvement in medication administration, adherence, and polypharmacy among intervention participants. The incidence of drug related problems was significantly higher in the control group (median = 1) after 6 months,<i> U</i> = 15, <i>z</i> = − 2.98, <i>p</i> = 0.01.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Medication review with follow-up is potentialy practical in community pharmacies, but there are feasibility issues. While these challenges can be addressed, it is essential to study larger sample sizes to establish more robust evidence regarding outcomes.</p><p><i>Clinical trial registry</i>: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05297461.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing feasibility of conducting medication review with follow-up among older adults at community pharmacy: a pilot randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Christina Malini Christopher, Ali Qais Blebil, KC Bhuvan, Deepa Alex, Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim, Norhasimah Ismail, Mark Wing Loong Cheong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-024-01711-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Medication review with follow-up is essential for optimising medication utilisation among the older adult population in primary healthcare.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing medication reviews with follow-up for older adults in community pharmacies and examined potential outcomes on medication use.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Method</h3><p>A pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted with 4 cluster-randomised community pharmacies to assess the feasibility of the intervention. Two community pharmacies served as intervention and control groups. Both groups recruited older adults over 60 who were followed over 6 months. The translated Medication use Questionnaire (MedUseQ) was administered at baseline and 6 months for both groups. The outcomes were to assess the feasibility of conducting medication review with follow-up and the probable medication use outcomes from the intervention.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The intervention and control groups comprised 14 and 13 older adults. A total of 35 recommendations were made by pharmacists in the intervention group and 8 in the control group. MedUseQ was easily administered, providing some evidence the feasibility of the intervention. However, there were feasibility challenges such as a lack of pharmacists, collaborative practice, difficulties with the tool language, time constraints, and limited funds. Questionnaire results provided a signal of improvement in medication administration, adherence, and polypharmacy among intervention participants. The incidence of drug related problems was significantly higher in the control group (median = 1) after 6 months,<i> U</i> = 15, <i>z</i> = − 2.98, <i>p</i> = 0.01.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Medication review with follow-up is potentialy practical in community pharmacies, but there are feasibility issues. While these challenges can be addressed, it is essential to study larger sample sizes to establish more robust evidence regarding outcomes.</p><p><i>Clinical trial registry</i>: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05297461.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01711-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01711-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估在社区药房对老年人实施随访式用药回顾的可行性,并研究其对用药的潜在影响。方法 在 4 家分组随机对照的社区药房开展了一项试点随机对照试验,以评估干预措施的可行性。两家社区药房分别作为干预组和对照组。两组均招募了 60 岁以上的老年人,对他们进行了为期 6 个月的跟踪调查。两组均在基线和 6 个月内进行了药物使用情况调查问卷(MedUseQ)的翻译。结果干预组和对照组分别有 14 名和 13 名老年人。干预组药剂师共提出 35 条建议,对照组药剂师提出 8 条建议。MedUseQ 易于实施,这在一定程度上证明了干预的可行性。然而,在可行性方面也存在一些挑战,如缺乏药剂师、合作实践、工具语言方面的困难、时间限制和资金有限等。问卷调查结果显示,干预参与者在用药、依从性和多种药物治疗方面都有所改善。6 个月后,对照组的药物相关问题发生率(中位数 = 1)明显高于干预组,U = 15, z = - 2.98, p = 0.01。虽然这些问题可以解决,但必须进行更大规模的样本研究,以建立更可靠的结果证据:临床试验登记:ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05297461。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing feasibility of conducting medication review with follow-up among older adults at community pharmacy: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Background

Medication review with follow-up is essential for optimising medication utilisation among the older adult population in primary healthcare.

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing medication reviews with follow-up for older adults in community pharmacies and examined potential outcomes on medication use.

Method

A pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted with 4 cluster-randomised community pharmacies to assess the feasibility of the intervention. Two community pharmacies served as intervention and control groups. Both groups recruited older adults over 60 who were followed over 6 months. The translated Medication use Questionnaire (MedUseQ) was administered at baseline and 6 months for both groups. The outcomes were to assess the feasibility of conducting medication review with follow-up and the probable medication use outcomes from the intervention.

Results

The intervention and control groups comprised 14 and 13 older adults. A total of 35 recommendations were made by pharmacists in the intervention group and 8 in the control group. MedUseQ was easily administered, providing some evidence the feasibility of the intervention. However, there were feasibility challenges such as a lack of pharmacists, collaborative practice, difficulties with the tool language, time constraints, and limited funds. Questionnaire results provided a signal of improvement in medication administration, adherence, and polypharmacy among intervention participants. The incidence of drug related problems was significantly higher in the control group (median = 1) after 6 months, U = 15, z = − 2.98, p = 0.01.

Conclusion

Medication review with follow-up is potentialy practical in community pharmacies, but there are feasibility issues. While these challenges can be addressed, it is essential to study larger sample sizes to establish more robust evidence regarding outcomes.

Clinical trial registry: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05297461.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
期刊最新文献
Association of polypharmacy with clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in older adults with cardiometabolic diseases: a retrospective cohort study. Correction: Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ. Global trends in pharmacovigilance-related events: a 30-year analysis from the 2019 global burden of disease study. Medication errors in emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and severity. A randomised, crossover trial exploring the patient perspective and effectiveness of biosimilar adalimumab transition: IBD reference and biosimilar adalimumab cross over study (iBaSS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1