近岸波解析模型中的相干干扰校正及实验数据验证

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Ocean Modelling Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102369
Simon Treillou , Patrick Marchesiello , Christine M. Baker
{"title":"近岸波解析模型中的相干干扰校正及实验数据验证","authors":"Simon Treillou ,&nbsp;Patrick Marchesiello ,&nbsp;Christine M. Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Here we address the problem of coherent interference that arises in double-sum wavemakers of wave-resolving models. Identified as a key problem for experimental and numerical simulations since the late 1970s, this problem induces spurious persistent longshore variability and affects nearshore dynamics. To overcome this problem, we present the implementation of a single-sum wavemaker in the 3D wave-resolving model CROCO. The new wavemaker, which assigns only one pair of direction and frequency values to each component of the wave spectrum, definitively prevents coherent interference, unlike a conventional double-sum wavemaker that allows waves of different direction to share the same frequency. Each wave component must also strictly comply with the periodicity rules, to avoid any spurious boundary dynamics. We validate the single-sum wavemaker with experimental data collected in a wave basin with longshore-uniform bathymetry and compare results with the double-sum wavemaker simulations. We show that the new wavemaker produces transient rips devoid of any coherent interference effect and that, consequently, the model statistics closely match the experimental data. The new wavemaker therefore guarantees statistical integrity while reducing computational costs, a necessary step for realistic wave-resolving studies of nearshore dynamics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 102369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction of coherent interference in wave-resolving nearshore models and validation with experimental data\",\"authors\":\"Simon Treillou ,&nbsp;Patrick Marchesiello ,&nbsp;Christine M. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Here we address the problem of coherent interference that arises in double-sum wavemakers of wave-resolving models. Identified as a key problem for experimental and numerical simulations since the late 1970s, this problem induces spurious persistent longshore variability and affects nearshore dynamics. To overcome this problem, we present the implementation of a single-sum wavemaker in the 3D wave-resolving model CROCO. The new wavemaker, which assigns only one pair of direction and frequency values to each component of the wave spectrum, definitively prevents coherent interference, unlike a conventional double-sum wavemaker that allows waves of different direction to share the same frequency. Each wave component must also strictly comply with the periodicity rules, to avoid any spurious boundary dynamics. We validate the single-sum wavemaker with experimental data collected in a wave basin with longshore-uniform bathymetry and compare results with the double-sum wavemaker simulations. We show that the new wavemaker produces transient rips devoid of any coherent interference effect and that, consequently, the model statistics closely match the experimental data. The new wavemaker therefore guarantees statistical integrity while reducing computational costs, a necessary step for realistic wave-resolving studies of nearshore dynamics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean Modelling\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000568\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这里,我们讨论了波浪解算模型的双和波浪发生器中出现的相干干扰问题。自 20 世纪 70 年代末以来,这个问题已被确定为实验和数值模拟的一个关键问题,它会诱发虚假的持续长岸变化,并影响近岸动力学。为了克服这一问题,我们在三维波浪解析模型 CROCO 中实施了单和造浪技术。与允许不同方向的波浪共享相同频率的传统双和制波器不同,这种新制波器只为波谱中的每个分量分配一对方向和频率值,可明确防止相干干扰。每个波谱分量还必须严格遵守周期规则,以避免任何虚假的边界动态。我们利用在具有长岸均匀水深的波浪盆地中收集的实验数据验证了单和造浪器,并将结果与双和造浪器的模拟结果进行了比较。结果表明,新造波器产生的瞬态波纹不存在任何相干干扰效应,因此,模型的统计数据与实验数据非常吻合。因此,新造波机在保证统计完整性的同时降低了计算成本,这是对近岸动力学进行真实波浪解析研究的必要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correction of coherent interference in wave-resolving nearshore models and validation with experimental data

Here we address the problem of coherent interference that arises in double-sum wavemakers of wave-resolving models. Identified as a key problem for experimental and numerical simulations since the late 1970s, this problem induces spurious persistent longshore variability and affects nearshore dynamics. To overcome this problem, we present the implementation of a single-sum wavemaker in the 3D wave-resolving model CROCO. The new wavemaker, which assigns only one pair of direction and frequency values to each component of the wave spectrum, definitively prevents coherent interference, unlike a conventional double-sum wavemaker that allows waves of different direction to share the same frequency. Each wave component must also strictly comply with the periodicity rules, to avoid any spurious boundary dynamics. We validate the single-sum wavemaker with experimental data collected in a wave basin with longshore-uniform bathymetry and compare results with the double-sum wavemaker simulations. We show that the new wavemaker produces transient rips devoid of any coherent interference effect and that, consequently, the model statistics closely match the experimental data. The new wavemaker therefore guarantees statistical integrity while reducing computational costs, a necessary step for realistic wave-resolving studies of nearshore dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Modelling
Ocean Modelling 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
19.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.
期刊最新文献
Low power computation of transoceanic wave propagation for tsunami hazard mitigation Discrete variance decay analysis of spurious mixing Global tsunami modelling on a spherical multiple-cell grid Accuracy assessment of recent global ocean tide models in coastal waters of the European North West Shelf Enhancing model temperature estimations in shallow, turbid, coastal regions: Mobile Bay, Alabama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1