恢复叶绿体仍然是一项挑战:呼吁制定成功的方法

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q2 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Aquatic Botany Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1016/j.aquabot.2024.103777
C.L. Faithfull , E. Tamarit , P. Nordling , E. Kraft
{"title":"恢复叶绿体仍然是一项挑战:呼吁制定成功的方法","authors":"C.L. Faithfull ,&nbsp;E. Tamarit ,&nbsp;P. Nordling ,&nbsp;E. Kraft","doi":"10.1016/j.aquabot.2024.103777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Submerged aquatic vegetation, and especially charophytes, which are an important habitat for many species, have declined in the Baltic Sea due to changes in light climate, eutrophication and physical disturbance. Physical disturbance in the form of small-scale dredging activities is commonplace in Sweden due to land uplift, but causes fragmentation of coastal habitats. Here we test three planting methods for restoration of the charophyte <em>Chara aspera</em> on an area of deposited sediment, and a single method for restoration of <em>C. tomentosa</em> in a dredged area. We found that none of the planting methods tested was more successful than natural recolonization of <em>C. aspera</em> on the deposited sediment. <em>C. tomentosa</em> planting was unsuccessful in the dredged area and was likely outcompeted for light by taller species. The <em>C. aspera</em> meadow was resilient to smaller disturbances, as experimental removal of up to 2.5% of <em>C. aspera</em> and sediment from the donor area did not reduce <em>C. aspera</em> coverage a month after removal. Even after an uncontrolled event that removed up to 50% of <em>C. aspera</em> in the experimental plots, <em>C. aspera</em> coverage had returned to pre-removal levels a year after the disturbance. We suggest future restoration experiments test transplanting sediment rich in oocytes and bulbils into areas with suitable light climates and low competition with other species. Restoration efforts are costly and highly uncertain of success, therefore we recommend discontinuing dredging activities in charophyte meadows to protect this important habitat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8273,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304377024000299/pdfft?md5=3ec451913b33b8d1f48ab929a41314b9&pid=1-s2.0-S0304377024000299-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restoring charophytes is still a challenge: A call for developing successful methods\",\"authors\":\"C.L. Faithfull ,&nbsp;E. Tamarit ,&nbsp;P. Nordling ,&nbsp;E. Kraft\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aquabot.2024.103777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Submerged aquatic vegetation, and especially charophytes, which are an important habitat for many species, have declined in the Baltic Sea due to changes in light climate, eutrophication and physical disturbance. Physical disturbance in the form of small-scale dredging activities is commonplace in Sweden due to land uplift, but causes fragmentation of coastal habitats. Here we test three planting methods for restoration of the charophyte <em>Chara aspera</em> on an area of deposited sediment, and a single method for restoration of <em>C. tomentosa</em> in a dredged area. We found that none of the planting methods tested was more successful than natural recolonization of <em>C. aspera</em> on the deposited sediment. <em>C. tomentosa</em> planting was unsuccessful in the dredged area and was likely outcompeted for light by taller species. The <em>C. aspera</em> meadow was resilient to smaller disturbances, as experimental removal of up to 2.5% of <em>C. aspera</em> and sediment from the donor area did not reduce <em>C. aspera</em> coverage a month after removal. Even after an uncontrolled event that removed up to 50% of <em>C. aspera</em> in the experimental plots, <em>C. aspera</em> coverage had returned to pre-removal levels a year after the disturbance. We suggest future restoration experiments test transplanting sediment rich in oocytes and bulbils into areas with suitable light climates and low competition with other species. Restoration efforts are costly and highly uncertain of success, therefore we recommend discontinuing dredging activities in charophyte meadows to protect this important habitat.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquatic Botany\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304377024000299/pdfft?md5=3ec451913b33b8d1f48ab929a41314b9&pid=1-s2.0-S0304377024000299-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquatic Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304377024000299\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304377024000299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于光照气候的变化、富营养化和物理干扰,波罗的海的水下植被,尤其是作为许多物种重要栖息地的藻类,已经减少。在瑞典,由于陆地隆起,以小规模疏浚活动为形式的物理干扰很常见,但却造成了沿海栖息地的破碎化。在这里,我们测试了三种在沉积物区域恢复叶绿藻 Chara aspera 的种植方法,以及一种在疏浚区域恢复 C. tomentosa 的单一方法。我们发现,所测试的种植方法中,没有一种比在沉积物上自然重新定殖茶藨子更成功。在疏浚区种植鹅掌楸并不成功,很可能是被更高大的物种争夺了光照。鹅掌楸草甸对较小的干扰具有较强的适应能力,因为实验性地从供体区移除多达 2.5% 的鹅掌楸和沉积物后一个月,鹅掌楸的覆盖率并没有减少。即使在一次不受控制的事件中清除了实验地块中多达 50% 的白花蛇舌草,白花蛇舌草的覆盖率也在干扰发生一年后恢复到了清除前的水平。我们建议在未来的恢复实验中,测试将富含卵细胞和鳞茎的沉积物移植到光照气候适宜、与其他物种竞争较少的地区。恢复工作成本高昂,成功与否极不确定,因此我们建议停止在叶绿藻草甸进行疏浚活动,以保护这一重要的栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Restoring charophytes is still a challenge: A call for developing successful methods

Submerged aquatic vegetation, and especially charophytes, which are an important habitat for many species, have declined in the Baltic Sea due to changes in light climate, eutrophication and physical disturbance. Physical disturbance in the form of small-scale dredging activities is commonplace in Sweden due to land uplift, but causes fragmentation of coastal habitats. Here we test three planting methods for restoration of the charophyte Chara aspera on an area of deposited sediment, and a single method for restoration of C. tomentosa in a dredged area. We found that none of the planting methods tested was more successful than natural recolonization of C. aspera on the deposited sediment. C. tomentosa planting was unsuccessful in the dredged area and was likely outcompeted for light by taller species. The C. aspera meadow was resilient to smaller disturbances, as experimental removal of up to 2.5% of C. aspera and sediment from the donor area did not reduce C. aspera coverage a month after removal. Even after an uncontrolled event that removed up to 50% of C. aspera in the experimental plots, C. aspera coverage had returned to pre-removal levels a year after the disturbance. We suggest future restoration experiments test transplanting sediment rich in oocytes and bulbils into areas with suitable light climates and low competition with other species. Restoration efforts are costly and highly uncertain of success, therefore we recommend discontinuing dredging activities in charophyte meadows to protect this important habitat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aquatic Botany
Aquatic Botany 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Aquatic Botany offers a platform for papers relevant to a broad international readership on fundamental and applied aspects of marine and freshwater macroscopic plants in a context of ecology or environmental biology. This includes molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects of macroscopic aquatic plants as well as the classification, structure, function, dynamics and ecological interactions in plant-dominated aquatic communities and ecosystems. It is an outlet for papers dealing with research on the consequences of disturbance and stressors (e.g. environmental fluctuations and climate change, pollution, grazing and pathogens), use and management of aquatic plants (plant production and decomposition, commercial harvest, plant control) and the conservation of aquatic plant communities (breeding, transplantation and restoration). Specialized publications on certain rare taxa or papers on aquatic macroscopic plants from under-represented regions in the world can also find their place, subject to editor evaluation. Studies on fungi or microalgae will remain outside the scope of Aquatic Botany.
期刊最新文献
Rare occurrence of only female flowers suggests a lack of sexual reproduction and potential clonality of the seagrass Halophila baillonii Asch. on the Pacific coast of Costa Rica Carbon allocation dynamics of Spartina alterniflora in Georgia saltmarsh, USA First record of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea (Forsskal) Ascherson in the waters of the continental United States (Key Biscayne, Florida) Editorial Board Iron co-limitation of Sargassum fluitans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1