公司为何要整合产品和服务?将决策者的个性特征与决策逻辑联系起来

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Service Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1108/jstp-05-2023-0164
Wim Coreynen, Johanna Vanderstraeten, Joeri van Hugten, Arjen van Witteloostuijn
{"title":"公司为何要整合产品和服务?将决策者的个性特征与决策逻辑联系起来","authors":"Wim Coreynen, Johanna Vanderstraeten, Joeri van Hugten, Arjen van Witteloostuijn","doi":"10.1108/jstp-05-2023-0164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Despite the increasing attention given to product-service integration (PSI), little is known about this innovation strategy from a key decision-maker’s perspective. To address this gap, our study draws from personality psychology and decision-making (DM) logics theory to better understand why and how companies’ decision-makers strategize for PSI.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using an abductive, empirics-first approach, we identify the study’s theoretical building blocks, followed by an exploratory quantitative analysis to generate new theory. We propose a fit-as-mediation conceptual framework suggesting that (1) specific personality traits [i.e. honesty-humility (H), emotionality (E), extraversion (X), agreeableness (A), conscientiousness (C) and openness to experience (O) (HEXACO)] make decision-makers more likely to include PSI in their company’s strategy and (2) depending on their personality, they apply different DM logics (i.e. causation or effectuation) to do so. To empirically examine this, we use data from 289 SMEs’ decision-makers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>We report several meaningful relationships among our key theoretical constructs. For instance, we find that conscientious decision-makers are more likely to develop a PSI strategy via causation, whereas extravert decision-makers are more likely to do so via both causation and effectuation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This service study is the first to apply the well-established HEXACO Personality Inventory to companies’ key decision-makers. Moreover, it contributes to the microfoundations of PSI strategy and DM logic theories.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do companies integrate products and services? Linking decision-makers’ personality traits and decision-making logics\",\"authors\":\"Wim Coreynen, Johanna Vanderstraeten, Joeri van Hugten, Arjen van Witteloostuijn\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jstp-05-2023-0164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Despite the increasing attention given to product-service integration (PSI), little is known about this innovation strategy from a key decision-maker’s perspective. To address this gap, our study draws from personality psychology and decision-making (DM) logics theory to better understand why and how companies’ decision-makers strategize for PSI.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Using an abductive, empirics-first approach, we identify the study’s theoretical building blocks, followed by an exploratory quantitative analysis to generate new theory. We propose a fit-as-mediation conceptual framework suggesting that (1) specific personality traits [i.e. honesty-humility (H), emotionality (E), extraversion (X), agreeableness (A), conscientiousness (C) and openness to experience (O) (HEXACO)] make decision-makers more likely to include PSI in their company’s strategy and (2) depending on their personality, they apply different DM logics (i.e. causation or effectuation) to do so. To empirically examine this, we use data from 289 SMEs’ decision-makers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>We report several meaningful relationships among our key theoretical constructs. For instance, we find that conscientious decision-makers are more likely to develop a PSI strategy via causation, whereas extravert decision-makers are more likely to do so via both causation and effectuation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This service study is the first to apply the well-established HEXACO Personality Inventory to companies’ key decision-makers. Moreover, it contributes to the microfoundations of PSI strategy and DM logic theories.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Service Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Service Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-05-2023-0164\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-05-2023-0164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的尽管产品服务整合(PSI)日益受到关注,但从关键决策者的角度来看,人们对这一创新战略知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们的研究借鉴了人格心理学和决策(DM)逻辑理论,以更好地理解公司决策者为何以及如何制定 PSI 战略。设计/方法/途径我们采用归纳式、经验主义优先的方法,确定了研究的理论基石,随后进行了探索性定量分析,以生成新的理论。我们提出了一个 "契合即中介 "的概念框架,认为(1)特定的人格特质[即诚实-谦逊(H)、情绪化(E)、外向性(X)、宜人性(A)、自觉性(C)和经验开放性(O)(HEXACO)]会使决策者更有可能将 PSI 纳入公司战略;(2)根据其人格特质,他们会采用不同的 DM 逻辑(即因果关系或效应)来这样做。为了对此进行实证研究,我们使用了来自 289 家中小企业决策者的数据。例如,我们发现自觉型决策者更有可能通过因果关系制定 PSI 战略,而外向型决策者更有可能通过因果关系制定 PSI 战略。此外,这项研究还为 PSI 战略和 DM 逻辑理论的微观基础做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why do companies integrate products and services? Linking decision-makers’ personality traits and decision-making logics

Purpose

Despite the increasing attention given to product-service integration (PSI), little is known about this innovation strategy from a key decision-maker’s perspective. To address this gap, our study draws from personality psychology and decision-making (DM) logics theory to better understand why and how companies’ decision-makers strategize for PSI.

Design/methodology/approach

Using an abductive, empirics-first approach, we identify the study’s theoretical building blocks, followed by an exploratory quantitative analysis to generate new theory. We propose a fit-as-mediation conceptual framework suggesting that (1) specific personality traits [i.e. honesty-humility (H), emotionality (E), extraversion (X), agreeableness (A), conscientiousness (C) and openness to experience (O) (HEXACO)] make decision-makers more likely to include PSI in their company’s strategy and (2) depending on their personality, they apply different DM logics (i.e. causation or effectuation) to do so. To empirically examine this, we use data from 289 SMEs’ decision-makers.

Findings

We report several meaningful relationships among our key theoretical constructs. For instance, we find that conscientious decision-makers are more likely to develop a PSI strategy via causation, whereas extravert decision-makers are more likely to do so via both causation and effectuation.

Originality/value

This service study is the first to apply the well-established HEXACO Personality Inventory to companies’ key decision-makers. Moreover, it contributes to the microfoundations of PSI strategy and DM logic theories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
15.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Managing Service Quality – Impact Factor: 1.286 (2015) – the Journal of Service Theory and Practice (JSTP) aims to publish research in the field of service management that not only makes a theoretical contribution to the service literature, but also scrutinizes and helps improve industry practices by offering specific recommendations and action plans to practitioners. Recognizing the importance of the service sector across the globe, the journal encourages submissions from and/or studying issues from around the world. JSTP gives prominence to research based on real world data, be it quantitative or qualitative. The journal also encourages the submission of strong conceptual and theoretical papers that make a substantive contribution to the scholarly literature in service management. JSTP publishes double-blind peer reviewed papers and encourages submissions from both academics and practitioners. The changing social structures and values, as well as new developments in economic, political, and technological fields are creating sea-changes in the philosophy, strategic aims, operational practices, and structures of many organizations. These changes are particularly relevant to the service sector, as public demand for high standards increases, and organizations fight for both market share and public credibility. The journal specifically addresses solutions to these challenges from a global, multi-cultural, and multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Does employee intervention encourage or discourage the spread of dysfunctional customer behavior? Determinants of customer buying behaviour in omnichannel retailing: a systematic literature review and future research directions Unlocking emotional labor: how organizational control systems shape frontline service employees’ emotional labor The edifying body: the role of embodied practices in the social production of servicescapes Occupational stress as a mediator between organisational intelligence traits and digital government service quality: a triangulation design approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1