工业 4.0 的混合智能故障分析:文献综述与未来展望

IF 5.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1007/s10845-024-02376-5
Mahdi Mokhtarzadeh, Jorge Rodríguez-Echeverría, Ivana Semanjski, Sidharta Gautama
{"title":"工业 4.0 的混合智能故障分析:文献综述与未来展望","authors":"Mahdi Mokhtarzadeh, Jorge Rodríguez-Echeverría, Ivana Semanjski, Sidharta Gautama","doi":"10.1007/s10845-024-02376-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Industry 4.0 and advanced technology, such as sensors and human–machine cooperation, provide new possibilities for infusing intelligence into failure analysis. Failure analysis is the process of identifying (potential) failures and determining their causes and effects to enhance reliability and manufacturing quality. Proactive methodologies, such as failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), and reactive methodologies, such as root cause analysis (RCA) and fault tree analysis (FTA), are used to analyze failures before and after their occurrence. This paper focused on failure analysis methodologies intelligentization literature applied to FMEA, RCA, and FTA to provide insights into expert-driven, data-driven, and hybrid intelligence failure analysis advancements. Types of data to establish an intelligence failure analysis, tools to find a failure’s causes and effects, e.g., Bayesian networks, and managerial insights are discussed. This literature review, along with the analyses within it, assists failure and quality analysts in developing effective hybrid intelligence failure analysis methodologies that leverage the strengths of both proactive and reactive methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid intelligence failure analysis for industry 4.0: a literature review and future prospective\",\"authors\":\"Mahdi Mokhtarzadeh, Jorge Rodríguez-Echeverría, Ivana Semanjski, Sidharta Gautama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10845-024-02376-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Industry 4.0 and advanced technology, such as sensors and human–machine cooperation, provide new possibilities for infusing intelligence into failure analysis. Failure analysis is the process of identifying (potential) failures and determining their causes and effects to enhance reliability and manufacturing quality. Proactive methodologies, such as failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), and reactive methodologies, such as root cause analysis (RCA) and fault tree analysis (FTA), are used to analyze failures before and after their occurrence. This paper focused on failure analysis methodologies intelligentization literature applied to FMEA, RCA, and FTA to provide insights into expert-driven, data-driven, and hybrid intelligence failure analysis advancements. Types of data to establish an intelligence failure analysis, tools to find a failure’s causes and effects, e.g., Bayesian networks, and managerial insights are discussed. This literature review, along with the analyses within it, assists failure and quality analysts in developing effective hybrid intelligence failure analysis methodologies that leverage the strengths of both proactive and reactive methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02376-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02376-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工业 4.0 和先进技术(如传感器和人机合作)为在故障分析中注入智能提供了新的可能性。故障分析是识别(潜在)故障并确定其原因和影响以提高可靠性和制造质量的过程。故障模式和影响分析(FMEA)等主动方法以及根本原因分析(RCA)和故障树分析(FTA)等被动方法用于在故障发生前后对其进行分析。本文重点介绍了应用于 FMEA、RCA 和 FTA 的故障分析方法智能化文献,为专家驱动型、数据驱动型和混合型智能故障分析的进步提供了见解。讨论了建立智能故障分析的数据类型、查找故障原因和影响的工具(如贝叶斯网络)以及管理见解。本文献综述及其中的分析有助于故障和质量分析人员开发有效的混合情报故障分析方法,充分利用主动和被动方法的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybrid intelligence failure analysis for industry 4.0: a literature review and future prospective

Industry 4.0 and advanced technology, such as sensors and human–machine cooperation, provide new possibilities for infusing intelligence into failure analysis. Failure analysis is the process of identifying (potential) failures and determining their causes and effects to enhance reliability and manufacturing quality. Proactive methodologies, such as failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), and reactive methodologies, such as root cause analysis (RCA) and fault tree analysis (FTA), are used to analyze failures before and after their occurrence. This paper focused on failure analysis methodologies intelligentization literature applied to FMEA, RCA, and FTA to provide insights into expert-driven, data-driven, and hybrid intelligence failure analysis advancements. Types of data to establish an intelligence failure analysis, tools to find a failure’s causes and effects, e.g., Bayesian networks, and managerial insights are discussed. This literature review, along with the analyses within it, assists failure and quality analysts in developing effective hybrid intelligence failure analysis methodologies that leverage the strengths of both proactive and reactive methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 工程技术-工程:制造
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
9.60%
发文量
171
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nonlinear Engineering aims to be a platform for sharing original research results in theoretical, experimental, practical, and applied nonlinear phenomena within engineering. It serves as a forum to exchange ideas and applications of nonlinear problems across various engineering disciplines. Articles are considered for publication if they explore nonlinearities in engineering systems, offering realistic mathematical modeling, utilizing nonlinearity for new designs, stabilizing systems, understanding system behavior through nonlinearity, optimizing systems based on nonlinear interactions, and developing algorithms to harness and leverage nonlinear elements.
期刊最新文献
Industrial vision inspection using digital twins: bridging CAD models and realistic scenarios Reliability-improved machine learning model using knowledge-embedded learning approach for smart manufacturing Smart scheduling for next generation manufacturing systems: a systematic literature review An overview of traditional and advanced methods to detect part defects in additive manufacturing processes A systematic multi-layer cognitive model for intelligent machine tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1