高等教育教师对全纳和全纳学习环境的理解与挑战:系统文献综述

IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100605
Tisja Korthals Altes , Martijn Willemse , Sui Lin Goei , Melanie Ehren
{"title":"高等教育教师对全纳和全纳学习环境的理解与挑战:系统文献综述","authors":"Tisja Korthals Altes ,&nbsp;Martijn Willemse ,&nbsp;Sui Lin Goei ,&nbsp;Melanie Ehren","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the 1990s, there is a rise in attention to inclusion in education encompassing inclusion in Higher Education (HE), which is an important element of-/and leads to equity in society. HE-teachers are a key factor in improving inclusion in higher education, but little is known about 1) their understanding of inclusion, 2) the challenges they experience for establishing inclusion, and 3) how they characterize inclusive learning environments. In this study, these three aspects were explored using a systematic literature review. From the selected 36 peer-reviewed articles was concluded that even though there is a rise in attention to inclusion in HE in recent years, most attention is still on integrating students with disabilities in regular education instead of the newer broader definition of inclusion ‘for every student’. When HE-teachers’ understanding of inclusion was discussed, they more often had a positive attitude toward inclusion, but it is unclear what this attitude was against (and what is meant by positive/negative) due to the neglect of mentioned definitions of characteristics. HE-teachers’ challenges for inclusion in higher education are internal (lack of knowledge, skills, experience, and confidence) and institutional (lack of resources, support, information, and training). These findings demonstrate the necessity of cooperation between teachers and HE-institutions, in addition to the role of scholars in studying teachers' understanding of inclusion, to improve the inclusive learning environment of students in HE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000149/pdfft?md5=0871f66c23f2f1c1f5c16bbc58d5f4d7&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X24000149-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher education teachers’ understandings of and challenges for inclusion and inclusive learning environments: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Tisja Korthals Altes ,&nbsp;Martijn Willemse ,&nbsp;Sui Lin Goei ,&nbsp;Melanie Ehren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Since the 1990s, there is a rise in attention to inclusion in education encompassing inclusion in Higher Education (HE), which is an important element of-/and leads to equity in society. HE-teachers are a key factor in improving inclusion in higher education, but little is known about 1) their understanding of inclusion, 2) the challenges they experience for establishing inclusion, and 3) how they characterize inclusive learning environments. In this study, these three aspects were explored using a systematic literature review. From the selected 36 peer-reviewed articles was concluded that even though there is a rise in attention to inclusion in HE in recent years, most attention is still on integrating students with disabilities in regular education instead of the newer broader definition of inclusion ‘for every student’. When HE-teachers’ understanding of inclusion was discussed, they more often had a positive attitude toward inclusion, but it is unclear what this attitude was against (and what is meant by positive/negative) due to the neglect of mentioned definitions of characteristics. HE-teachers’ challenges for inclusion in higher education are internal (lack of knowledge, skills, experience, and confidence) and institutional (lack of resources, support, information, and training). These findings demonstrate the necessity of cooperation between teachers and HE-institutions, in addition to the role of scholars in studying teachers' understanding of inclusion, to improve the inclusive learning environment of students in HE.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000149/pdfft?md5=0871f66c23f2f1c1f5c16bbc58d5f4d7&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X24000149-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000149\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,全纳教育受到越来越多的关注,其中包括高等教育 (HE)中的全纳教育,这是社会公平的一个重要因素。高校教师是提高高等教育全纳性的一个关键因素,但人们对 1) 他们对全纳的理解,2) 他们在建立全纳教育时所遇到的挑战,以及 3) 他们是如何描述全纳学习环境的,却知之甚少。本研究通过系统的文献综述对这三个方面进行了探讨。从所选的 36 篇同行评议文章中得出的结论是,尽管近年来对高校全纳教育的关注度有所提高,但大多数关注点仍然是将残疾学生纳入常规教育,而不是 "面向每一个学生 "这一更为宽泛的全纳定义。在讨论高校教师对全纳的理解时,他们对全纳更多地持积极态度,但由于忽略了所提及的特征定义,这种态度针对的是什么(以及积极/消极的含义是什么)并不清楚。高校教师在高等教育全纳方面面临的挑战既有内部的(缺乏知识、技能、经验和信 心),也有体制上的(缺乏资源、支持、信息和培训)。这些研究结果表明,除了学者在研究教师对全纳的理解方面所起的作用外,教师和高等院校之间还必须开展合作,以改善高等院校学生的全纳学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Higher education teachers’ understandings of and challenges for inclusion and inclusive learning environments: A systematic literature review

Since the 1990s, there is a rise in attention to inclusion in education encompassing inclusion in Higher Education (HE), which is an important element of-/and leads to equity in society. HE-teachers are a key factor in improving inclusion in higher education, but little is known about 1) their understanding of inclusion, 2) the challenges they experience for establishing inclusion, and 3) how they characterize inclusive learning environments. In this study, these three aspects were explored using a systematic literature review. From the selected 36 peer-reviewed articles was concluded that even though there is a rise in attention to inclusion in HE in recent years, most attention is still on integrating students with disabilities in regular education instead of the newer broader definition of inclusion ‘for every student’. When HE-teachers’ understanding of inclusion was discussed, they more often had a positive attitude toward inclusion, but it is unclear what this attitude was against (and what is meant by positive/negative) due to the neglect of mentioned definitions of characteristics. HE-teachers’ challenges for inclusion in higher education are internal (lack of knowledge, skills, experience, and confidence) and institutional (lack of resources, support, information, and training). These findings demonstrate the necessity of cooperation between teachers and HE-institutions, in addition to the role of scholars in studying teachers' understanding of inclusion, to improve the inclusive learning environment of students in HE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
期刊最新文献
A meta-analysis of the correlation between teacher self-efficacy and teacher resilience: Concerted growth and contextual variance A systematic review on how educators teach AI in K-12 education Translating neuroscience to early childhood education: A scoping review of neuroscience-based professional learning for early childhood educators What is next in mobile-assisted reading? Insights from a decade of eye tracking research into cognitive processes Teaching for paradigm shifts: Supporting the drivers of radical creativity in management education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1