工业 5.0 能否发展弹性供应链?分析工业 5.0 CSF 的综合决策方法

IF 6.9 3区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Systems Frontiers Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1007/s10796-024-10486-x
Rahul Sindhwani, Abhishek Behl, Ramandeep Singh, Sushma Kumari
{"title":"工业 5.0 能否发展弹性供应链?分析工业 5.0 CSF 的综合决策方法","authors":"Rahul Sindhwani, Abhishek Behl, Ramandeep Singh, Sushma Kumari","doi":"10.1007/s10796-024-10486-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Advances in science and technology act as the gatekeepers of a sustainable future where a stable environment helps generate the power for innovation. Supply chains are the messengers of this euphoric future. However, when the messengers and the gatekeepers are not in sync, the flow of information is bound to stop and bring about a chaotic turn of events, the repercussions of which can be felt through the years. The same was the case with the COVID-19 pandemic, where the lack of man–machine collaboration in Industry 4.0 and the inability of firms to advance their supply chains technologically left them exposed and vulnerable to the disruptions created by the pandemic. It was an eye-opener for companies worldwide as the supply chains collapsed and production reached a standstill. Thus, a stance arises to re-evaluate the resilience capabilities of the supply chains and rethink the priorities for achieving sustainable and resilient supply chain practices. We also suggest injecting industry 5.0 technologies to meet the re-assessed priorities. For this, we have identified the criteria and CSFs of supply chain resilience using the PRISMA 2020 statement and subsequently analyzed them using PF-AHP (for finding criteria weights), m-TISM (to interpret the interrelationships of the CSFs), PF-CoCoSo (to rank the CSFs) and sensitivity analysis (to check the robustness). The results suggest cost-effectiveness as the top weighted criteria and disruption awareness as the highest priority CSF for achieving supply chain resilience.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":13610,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Frontiers","volume":"376 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Industry 5.0 Develop a Resilient Supply Chain? An Integrated Decision-Making Approach by Analyzing I5.0 CSFs\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Sindhwani, Abhishek Behl, Ramandeep Singh, Sushma Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10796-024-10486-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Advances in science and technology act as the gatekeepers of a sustainable future where a stable environment helps generate the power for innovation. Supply chains are the messengers of this euphoric future. However, when the messengers and the gatekeepers are not in sync, the flow of information is bound to stop and bring about a chaotic turn of events, the repercussions of which can be felt through the years. The same was the case with the COVID-19 pandemic, where the lack of man–machine collaboration in Industry 4.0 and the inability of firms to advance their supply chains technologically left them exposed and vulnerable to the disruptions created by the pandemic. It was an eye-opener for companies worldwide as the supply chains collapsed and production reached a standstill. Thus, a stance arises to re-evaluate the resilience capabilities of the supply chains and rethink the priorities for achieving sustainable and resilient supply chain practices. We also suggest injecting industry 5.0 technologies to meet the re-assessed priorities. For this, we have identified the criteria and CSFs of supply chain resilience using the PRISMA 2020 statement and subsequently analyzed them using PF-AHP (for finding criteria weights), m-TISM (to interpret the interrelationships of the CSFs), PF-CoCoSo (to rank the CSFs) and sensitivity analysis (to check the robustness). The results suggest cost-effectiveness as the top weighted criteria and disruption awareness as the highest priority CSF for achieving supply chain resilience.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Frontiers\",\"volume\":\"376 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10486-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10486-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科技进步是可持续未来的守门人,稳定的环境有助于产生创新的动力。供应链是这一美好未来的信使。然而,当信使和守门人不同步时,信息流势必会停止,并带来混乱的局面,其影响会经年累月地显现出来。COVID-19 大流行病的情况也是如此,工业 4.0 中缺乏人机协作,企业无法在技术上推进其供应链,使其暴露在大流行病造成的破坏面前,并变得脆弱不堪。供应链的崩溃和生产的停滞让全球企业大开眼界。因此,需要重新评估供应链的恢复能力,重新思考实现可持续和恢复性供应链实践的优先事项。我们还建议注入工业 5.0 技术,以满足重新评估的优先事项。为此,我们使用 PRISMA 2020 声明确定了供应链复原力的标准和 CSF,随后使用 PF-AHP(用于确定标准权重)、m-TISM(用于解释 CSF 的相互关系)、PF-CoCoSo(用于对 CSF 进行排序)和敏感性分析(用于检查稳健性)对其进行了分析。结果表明,成本效益是加权最高的标准,中断意识是实现供应链复原力最优先的 CSF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Industry 5.0 Develop a Resilient Supply Chain? An Integrated Decision-Making Approach by Analyzing I5.0 CSFs

Advances in science and technology act as the gatekeepers of a sustainable future where a stable environment helps generate the power for innovation. Supply chains are the messengers of this euphoric future. However, when the messengers and the gatekeepers are not in sync, the flow of information is bound to stop and bring about a chaotic turn of events, the repercussions of which can be felt through the years. The same was the case with the COVID-19 pandemic, where the lack of man–machine collaboration in Industry 4.0 and the inability of firms to advance their supply chains technologically left them exposed and vulnerable to the disruptions created by the pandemic. It was an eye-opener for companies worldwide as the supply chains collapsed and production reached a standstill. Thus, a stance arises to re-evaluate the resilience capabilities of the supply chains and rethink the priorities for achieving sustainable and resilient supply chain practices. We also suggest injecting industry 5.0 technologies to meet the re-assessed priorities. For this, we have identified the criteria and CSFs of supply chain resilience using the PRISMA 2020 statement and subsequently analyzed them using PF-AHP (for finding criteria weights), m-TISM (to interpret the interrelationships of the CSFs), PF-CoCoSo (to rank the CSFs) and sensitivity analysis (to check the robustness). The results suggest cost-effectiveness as the top weighted criteria and disruption awareness as the highest priority CSF for achieving supply chain resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Systems Frontiers
Information Systems Frontiers 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
18.60%
发文量
127
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary interfaces of Information Systems (IS) are fast emerging as defining areas of research and development in IS. These developments are largely due to the transformation of Information Technology (IT) towards networked worlds and its effects on global communications and economies. While these developments are shaping the way information is used in all forms of human enterprise, they are also setting the tone and pace of information systems of the future. The major advances in IT such as client/server systems, the Internet and the desktop/multimedia computing revolution, for example, have led to numerous important vistas of research and development with considerable practical impact and academic significance. While the industry seeks to develop high performance IS/IT solutions to a variety of contemporary information support needs, academia looks to extend the reach of IS technology into new application domains. Information Systems Frontiers (ISF) aims to provide a common forum of dissemination of frontline industrial developments of substantial academic value and pioneering academic research of significant practical impact.
期刊最新文献
What Affects User Experience of Shared Mobility Services? Insights from Integrating Signaling Theory and Value Framework AI in the Organizational Nexus: Building Trust, Cementing Commitment, and Evolving Psychological Contracts A Grey Combined Prediction Model for Medical Treatment Risk Analysis during Pandemics Stress Level Assessment by a Multi-Parametric Wearable Platform: Relevance of Different Physiological Signals Classifying DSS Research – A Theoretical Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1