轴压比对浅埋矩形台站地震行为的影响混合模拟和准静力试验

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4138
Xuesong Cai, Chengyu Yang, Zhiqian Liu, Liming Jiang, Yong Yuan
{"title":"轴压比对浅埋矩形台站地震行为的影响混合模拟和准静力试验","authors":"Xuesong Cai,&nbsp;Chengyu Yang,&nbsp;Zhiqian Liu,&nbsp;Liming Jiang,&nbsp;Yong Yuan","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the absence of experimental investigations on column members of underground structures, full-scale column specimens were tested to explore the seismic behavior of shallow-buried subway stations at various depths. The axial compression ratios of internal column specimens were set as 0.16, 0.33, and 0.40. Both hybrid simulations and quasi-static tests were performed on the station columns. The hybrid simulations illustrated the drift demands of internal columns, while the load-carrying capacity and deformation capacity were obtained from the quasi-static tests. Hybrid simulations at low, moderate, and high-intensity levels were conducted to study the seismic responses of shallow-buried rectangular stations. The hybrid simulations suggest that the most severe damage occurred in the station when the axial compression ratio of the tested column reached 0.40. Central columns suffered severe stiffness deterioration under high-level earthquake excitation, especially in stations at greater depths. Meanwhile, the quasi-static test results indicate that the ultimate load of the central columns increases with increasing axial compression, but this leads to a significant decrease in the ductility of columns. Besides, the sectional analysis results show that the central columns are prone to tension-controlled failure, and the safety margin for flexural response deteriorates with an increasing axial compression ratio. The test results indicate that shallow-buried rectangular stations are susceptible to flexure-controlled structural failure when their central columns possess a relatively low axial compression ratio and a high shear span-to-depth ratio. The failure mechanism of station columns is revealed by both the hybrid simulations and quasi-static tests, and the findings from the full-scale tests are beneficial for the practical design of shallow-buried rectangular stations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of axial compression ratio on seismic behavior of shallow-buried rectangular stations: Hybrid simulation and quasi-static test\",\"authors\":\"Xuesong Cai,&nbsp;Chengyu Yang,&nbsp;Zhiqian Liu,&nbsp;Liming Jiang,&nbsp;Yong Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eqe.4138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the absence of experimental investigations on column members of underground structures, full-scale column specimens were tested to explore the seismic behavior of shallow-buried subway stations at various depths. The axial compression ratios of internal column specimens were set as 0.16, 0.33, and 0.40. Both hybrid simulations and quasi-static tests were performed on the station columns. The hybrid simulations illustrated the drift demands of internal columns, while the load-carrying capacity and deformation capacity were obtained from the quasi-static tests. Hybrid simulations at low, moderate, and high-intensity levels were conducted to study the seismic responses of shallow-buried rectangular stations. The hybrid simulations suggest that the most severe damage occurred in the station when the axial compression ratio of the tested column reached 0.40. Central columns suffered severe stiffness deterioration under high-level earthquake excitation, especially in stations at greater depths. Meanwhile, the quasi-static test results indicate that the ultimate load of the central columns increases with increasing axial compression, but this leads to a significant decrease in the ductility of columns. Besides, the sectional analysis results show that the central columns are prone to tension-controlled failure, and the safety margin for flexural response deteriorates with an increasing axial compression ratio. The test results indicate that shallow-buried rectangular stations are susceptible to flexure-controlled structural failure when their central columns possess a relatively low axial compression ratio and a high shear span-to-depth ratio. The failure mechanism of station columns is revealed by both the hybrid simulations and quasi-static tests, and the findings from the full-scale tests are beneficial for the practical design of shallow-buried rectangular stations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4138\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于缺乏对地下结构柱构件的实验研究,我们对全尺寸柱试件进行了测试,以探索不同深度浅埋地铁站的抗震行为。内柱试件的轴向压缩比分别设定为 0.16、0.33 和 0.40。对车站立柱进行了混合模拟和准静力试验。混合模拟说明了内柱的漂移要求,而承载能力和变形能力则是通过准静态试验获得的。在低、中、高烈度水平下进行了混合模拟,以研究浅埋矩形车站的地震响应。混合模拟结果表明,当测试柱的轴向压缩比达到 0.40 时,车站发生了最严重的破坏。在强震激励下,中心柱的刚度严重下降,尤其是在深度较大的台站。同时,准静力试验结果表明,中心柱的极限荷载随轴向压缩率的增加而增加,但这导致柱的延性显著下降。此外,断面分析结果表明,中心柱容易发生拉力控制破坏,而且随着轴向压缩比的增加,抗弯安全系数也会下降。试验结果表明,当浅埋矩形车站的中心柱具有相对较低的轴向压缩比和较高的剪切跨深比时,其结构很容易发生受屈曲控制的破坏。混合模拟和准静力试验揭示了车站支柱的破坏机理,全尺寸试验的结果有利于浅埋式矩形车站的实际设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of axial compression ratio on seismic behavior of shallow-buried rectangular stations: Hybrid simulation and quasi-static test

In the absence of experimental investigations on column members of underground structures, full-scale column specimens were tested to explore the seismic behavior of shallow-buried subway stations at various depths. The axial compression ratios of internal column specimens were set as 0.16, 0.33, and 0.40. Both hybrid simulations and quasi-static tests were performed on the station columns. The hybrid simulations illustrated the drift demands of internal columns, while the load-carrying capacity and deformation capacity were obtained from the quasi-static tests. Hybrid simulations at low, moderate, and high-intensity levels were conducted to study the seismic responses of shallow-buried rectangular stations. The hybrid simulations suggest that the most severe damage occurred in the station when the axial compression ratio of the tested column reached 0.40. Central columns suffered severe stiffness deterioration under high-level earthquake excitation, especially in stations at greater depths. Meanwhile, the quasi-static test results indicate that the ultimate load of the central columns increases with increasing axial compression, but this leads to a significant decrease in the ductility of columns. Besides, the sectional analysis results show that the central columns are prone to tension-controlled failure, and the safety margin for flexural response deteriorates with an increasing axial compression ratio. The test results indicate that shallow-buried rectangular stations are susceptible to flexure-controlled structural failure when their central columns possess a relatively low axial compression ratio and a high shear span-to-depth ratio. The failure mechanism of station columns is revealed by both the hybrid simulations and quasi-static tests, and the findings from the full-scale tests are beneficial for the practical design of shallow-buried rectangular stations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information SSI-induced seismic earth pressures on an integral abutment bridge model: Experimental measurements versus numerical simulations and code provisions Estimation of inelastic displacement ratio spectrum for existing RC structures via displacement response spectrum Linear equivalence for motion amplification devices in earthquake engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1