{"title":"论三维欧拉方程和二维布森斯克方程$$C^{1,\\alpha }$$奇异解的稳定性和不稳定性","authors":"Jiajie Chen, Thomas Y. Hou","doi":"10.1007/s00220-024-04978-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Singularity formation of the 3D incompressible Euler equations is known to be extremely challenging (Majda and Bertozzi in Vorticity and incompressible flow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, vol 27, 2002; Gibbon in Physica D 237(14):1894–1904, 2008; Kiselev, in: Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians, vol 3, 2018; Drivas and Elgindi in EMS Surv Math Sci 10(1):1–100, 2023; Constantin in Bull Am Math Soc 44(4):603–621, 2007). In Elgindi (Ann Math 194(3):647–727, 2021) (see also Elgindi et al. in Camb J Math 9(4), 2021), Elgindi proved that the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations with no swirl and <span>\\(C^{1,\\alpha }\\)</span> initial velocity develops a finite time singularity. Inspired by Elgindi’s work, we proved that the 3D axisymmetric Euler and 2D Boussinesq equations with <span>\\(C^{1,\\alpha }\\)</span> initial velocity and boundary develop a stable asymptotically self-similar (or approximately self-similar) finite time singularity (Chen and Hou in Commun Math Phys 383(3):1559–1667, 2021) in the same setting as the Hou-Luo blowup scenario (Luo and Hou in Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(36):12968–12973, 2014; Luo and Hou in SIAM Multiscale Model Simul 12(4):1722–1776, 2014). On the other hand, the authors of Vasseur and Vishik (Commun Math Phys 378(1):557–568, 2020) and Lafleche et al. (Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 155:140–154, 2021) recently showed that blowup solutions to the 3D Euler equations are hydrodynamically unstable. The instability results obtained in Vasseur and Vishik (2020) and Lafleche et al. (2021) require some strong regularity assumption on the initial data, which is not satisfied by the <span>\\(C^{1,\\alpha }\\)</span> velocity field. In this paper, we generalize the analysis of Elgindi (Ann Math 194(3):647–727, 2021), Chen and Hou (Commun Math Phys 383(3):1559–1667, 2021), Vasseur and Vishik (2020) and Lafleche et al. (2021) to show that the blowup solutions of the 3D Euler and 2D Boussinesq equations with <span>\\(C^{1,\\alpha }\\)</span> velocity are unstable under the notion of stability introduced in Vasseur and Vishik (2020) and Lafleche et al. (2021). These two seemingly contradictory results reflect the difference of the two approaches in studying the stability of 3D Euler blowup solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":522,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Mathematical Physics","volume":"405 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Stability and Instability of \\\\(C^{1,\\\\alpha }\\\\) Singular Solutions to the 3D Euler and 2D Boussinesq Equations\",\"authors\":\"Jiajie Chen, Thomas Y. Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00220-024-04978-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Singularity formation of the 3D incompressible Euler equations is known to be extremely challenging (Majda and Bertozzi in Vorticity and incompressible flow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, vol 27, 2002; Gibbon in Physica D 237(14):1894–1904, 2008; Kiselev, in: Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians, vol 3, 2018; Drivas and Elgindi in EMS Surv Math Sci 10(1):1–100, 2023; Constantin in Bull Am Math Soc 44(4):603–621, 2007). In Elgindi (Ann Math 194(3):647–727, 2021) (see also Elgindi et al. in Camb J Math 9(4), 2021), Elgindi proved that the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations with no swirl and <span>\\\\(C^{1,\\\\alpha }\\\\)</span> initial velocity develops a finite time singularity. Inspired by Elgindi’s work, we proved that the 3D axisymmetric Euler and 2D Boussinesq equations with <span>\\\\(C^{1,\\\\alpha }\\\\)</span> initial velocity and boundary develop a stable asymptotically self-similar (or approximately self-similar) finite time singularity (Chen and Hou in Commun Math Phys 383(3):1559–1667, 2021) in the same setting as the Hou-Luo blowup scenario (Luo and Hou in Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(36):12968–12973, 2014; Luo and Hou in SIAM Multiscale Model Simul 12(4):1722–1776, 2014). On the other hand, the authors of Vasseur and Vishik (Commun Math Phys 378(1):557–568, 2020) and Lafleche et al. (Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 155:140–154, 2021) recently showed that blowup solutions to the 3D Euler equations are hydrodynamically unstable. The instability results obtained in Vasseur and Vishik (2020) and Lafleche et al. (2021) require some strong regularity assumption on the initial data, which is not satisfied by the <span>\\\\(C^{1,\\\\alpha }\\\\)</span> velocity field. In this paper, we generalize the analysis of Elgindi (Ann Math 194(3):647–727, 2021), Chen and Hou (Commun Math Phys 383(3):1559–1667, 2021), Vasseur and Vishik (2020) and Lafleche et al. (2021) to show that the blowup solutions of the 3D Euler and 2D Boussinesq equations with <span>\\\\(C^{1,\\\\alpha }\\\\)</span> velocity are unstable under the notion of stability introduced in Vasseur and Vishik (2020) and Lafleche et al. (2021). These two seemingly contradictory results reflect the difference of the two approaches in studying the stability of 3D Euler blowup solutions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications in Mathematical Physics\",\"volume\":\"405 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications in Mathematical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00220-024-04978-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Mathematical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00220-024-04978-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
众所周知,三维不可压缩欧拉方程的奇点形成极具挑战性(Majda 和 Bertozzi,载于《涡性与不可压缩流》,剑桥大学出版社,剑桥,第 27 卷,2002 年;Gibbon,载于《Physica D》237(14):1894-1904, 2008 年;Kiselev,载于《国际数学家大会论文集》,第 3 卷,2018 年;Drivas 和 Elgindi,载于《EMS Surv Math Sci》10(1):1-100, 2023 年;Constantin,载于《Bull Am:国际数学家大会论文集》,第 3 卷,2018 年;Drivas 和 Elgindi 在 EMS Surv Math Sci 10(1):1-100, 2023 年;Constantin 在 Bull Am Math Soc 44(4):603-621, 2007 年)。在 Elgindi (Ann Math 194(3):647-727, 2021) (see also Elgindi et al. in Camb J Math 9(4), 2021)一文中,Elgindi 证明了无漩涡和 \(C^{1,\alpha }\) 初速度的三维轴对称欧拉方程会出现有限时间奇点。受 Elgindi 工作的启发,我们证明了具有 \(C^{1,\alpha }\) 初速度和边界的三维轴对称欧拉方程和二维布辛斯方程会发展出一个稳定的渐近自相似(或近似自相似)有限时间奇点(Chen 和 Hou in Commun Math Phys 383(3):1559-1667, 2021),其背景与 Hou-Luo 吹胀情形相同(Luo 和 Hou 发表于 Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(36):12968-12973, 2014;Luo 和 Hou 发表于 SIAM Multiscale Model Simul 12(4):1722-1776, 2014)。另一方面,Vasseur 和 Vishik(Commun Math Phys 378(1):557-568, 2020)以及 Lafleche 等人(Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 155:140-154, 2021)最近的研究表明,三维欧拉方程的炸裂解在流体力学上是不稳定的。Vasseur 和 Vishik (2020) 以及 Lafleche 等人 (2021) 所获得的不稳定性结果需要对初始数据进行一些强规则性假设,而 \(C^{1,\alpha }\) 速度场并不满足这些假设。在本文中,我们将 Elgindi (Ann Math 194(3):647-727, 2021)、Chen 和 Hou (Commun Math Phys 383(3):1559-1667, 2021)、Vasseur 和 Vishik (2020) 以及 Lafleche et al.(2021) 中引入的稳定性概念下,速度为 \(C^{1,\alpha }\ 的三维欧拉方程和二维布辛斯方程的炸裂解是不稳定的。这两个看似矛盾的结果反映了研究三维欧拉炸裂解稳定性的两种方法的不同。
On Stability and Instability of \(C^{1,\alpha }\) Singular Solutions to the 3D Euler and 2D Boussinesq Equations
Singularity formation of the 3D incompressible Euler equations is known to be extremely challenging (Majda and Bertozzi in Vorticity and incompressible flow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, vol 27, 2002; Gibbon in Physica D 237(14):1894–1904, 2008; Kiselev, in: Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians, vol 3, 2018; Drivas and Elgindi in EMS Surv Math Sci 10(1):1–100, 2023; Constantin in Bull Am Math Soc 44(4):603–621, 2007). In Elgindi (Ann Math 194(3):647–727, 2021) (see also Elgindi et al. in Camb J Math 9(4), 2021), Elgindi proved that the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations with no swirl and \(C^{1,\alpha }\) initial velocity develops a finite time singularity. Inspired by Elgindi’s work, we proved that the 3D axisymmetric Euler and 2D Boussinesq equations with \(C^{1,\alpha }\) initial velocity and boundary develop a stable asymptotically self-similar (or approximately self-similar) finite time singularity (Chen and Hou in Commun Math Phys 383(3):1559–1667, 2021) in the same setting as the Hou-Luo blowup scenario (Luo and Hou in Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(36):12968–12973, 2014; Luo and Hou in SIAM Multiscale Model Simul 12(4):1722–1776, 2014). On the other hand, the authors of Vasseur and Vishik (Commun Math Phys 378(1):557–568, 2020) and Lafleche et al. (Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 155:140–154, 2021) recently showed that blowup solutions to the 3D Euler equations are hydrodynamically unstable. The instability results obtained in Vasseur and Vishik (2020) and Lafleche et al. (2021) require some strong regularity assumption on the initial data, which is not satisfied by the \(C^{1,\alpha }\) velocity field. In this paper, we generalize the analysis of Elgindi (Ann Math 194(3):647–727, 2021), Chen and Hou (Commun Math Phys 383(3):1559–1667, 2021), Vasseur and Vishik (2020) and Lafleche et al. (2021) to show that the blowup solutions of the 3D Euler and 2D Boussinesq equations with \(C^{1,\alpha }\) velocity are unstable under the notion of stability introduced in Vasseur and Vishik (2020) and Lafleche et al. (2021). These two seemingly contradictory results reflect the difference of the two approaches in studying the stability of 3D Euler blowup solutions.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Communications in Mathematical Physics is to offer a high forum for works which are motivated by the vision and the challenges of modern physics and which at the same time meet the highest mathematical standards.