是时候摆脱 "大人物 "了吗?澳大利亚的情景证据和不可靠供词的风险

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW Alternative Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1177/1037969x241250053
Lisanne Adam, C. van Golde
{"title":"是时候摆脱 \"大人物 \"了吗?澳大利亚的情景证据和不可靠供词的风险","authors":"Lisanne Adam, C. van Golde","doi":"10.1177/1037969x241250053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ‘Mr Big’ method is a non-custodial investigative method used by police forces worldwide. A Mr Big operation involves an undercover operation in which a person suspected of involvement in an indictable offence, is unknowingly drawn into a fictitious criminal enterprise, in order to elicit a confession. There are ample concerns around the use of this method. Consequently, courts around the world have grappled with the admissibility of the confession evidence gathered through this approach. This article will first provide an outline of the Mr Big method. Following this, it will discuss the psychological explanation of associated potential coerced confessions which are unreliable. Additionally, various Australian cases and court rulings on confessions obtained using this approach will be described. This information will then be used, given the concerns indicated by psychological research and foreign court responses, in an attempt to address the question of whether the Mr Big method should have a place within the Australian legal system.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it time to move on from ‘Mr Big’? Scenario evidence and the risk of unreliable confessions in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Lisanne Adam, C. van Golde\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969x241250053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ‘Mr Big’ method is a non-custodial investigative method used by police forces worldwide. A Mr Big operation involves an undercover operation in which a person suspected of involvement in an indictable offence, is unknowingly drawn into a fictitious criminal enterprise, in order to elicit a confession. There are ample concerns around the use of this method. Consequently, courts around the world have grappled with the admissibility of the confession evidence gathered through this approach. This article will first provide an outline of the Mr Big method. Following this, it will discuss the psychological explanation of associated potential coerced confessions which are unreliable. Additionally, various Australian cases and court rulings on confessions obtained using this approach will be described. This information will then be used, given the concerns indicated by psychological research and foreign court responses, in an attempt to address the question of whether the Mr Big method should have a place within the Australian legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241250053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241250053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大先生 "法是一种非拘禁调查方法,为世界各地的警察部队所采用。大先生 "行动是一种秘密行动,在这种行动中,涉嫌参与可公诉罪行的人在不知情的情况下被卷入一个虚构的犯罪团伙,以获取供词。这种方法的使用引起了广泛关注。因此,世界各地的法院都在努力解决通过这种方法收集到的供词证据的可采性问题。本 文 首 先 會 概 述 大 夫 法 的 概 念 。然 後 , 文 章 會 討 論 有 關 不 可 靠 的 潛 在 脅 迫 供 認 的 心 理 解 釋 。此 外 , 本 文 還 會 描 述 澳 大 利 亞 有 關 使 用 這 種 方 法 所 取 得 供 認 的 各 種 案 例 和 法 庭 裁 決 。然 後 , 考 慮 到 心 理 學 研 究 所 顯 示 的 關 注 和 外 國 法 庭 的 反 應 , 本 文 將 會 利 用 這 些 資 料 , 嘗 詴 探 討 大 夫 法 應 否 在 澳 大 利 亞 的 法 律 制 度 中 佔 一 席 位 的 問 題 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is it time to move on from ‘Mr Big’? Scenario evidence and the risk of unreliable confessions in Australia
The ‘Mr Big’ method is a non-custodial investigative method used by police forces worldwide. A Mr Big operation involves an undercover operation in which a person suspected of involvement in an indictable offence, is unknowingly drawn into a fictitious criminal enterprise, in order to elicit a confession. There are ample concerns around the use of this method. Consequently, courts around the world have grappled with the admissibility of the confession evidence gathered through this approach. This article will first provide an outline of the Mr Big method. Following this, it will discuss the psychological explanation of associated potential coerced confessions which are unreliable. Additionally, various Australian cases and court rulings on confessions obtained using this approach will be described. This information will then be used, given the concerns indicated by psychological research and foreign court responses, in an attempt to address the question of whether the Mr Big method should have a place within the Australian legal system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Coming, ready or not Beyond the Preamble: Legislating the right to self-determination in a NSW Human Rights Act Family inclusion in child protection: Law, courts and balancing risks Returning to rebellious roots: What rebellious lawyering can offer progressive law in Australia Forks in the road to equality: The path for same-sex attracted individuals in Australia and Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1