太阳能技术可行性比较:工业界的替代建议

IF 3.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Efficiency Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1007/s12053-024-10226-9
Mert Gürtürk, Murat Erdem, Ferhat Uçar
{"title":"太阳能技术可行性比较:工业界的替代建议","authors":"Mert Gürtürk,&nbsp;Murat Erdem,&nbsp;Ferhat Uçar","doi":"10.1007/s12053-024-10226-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, 11 provinces with more than 1 MW solar power plants (SPP) in Turkey have been examined in terms of global solar radiation and power produced. The main objective of this study is to underline the serious differences in technical feasibility analysis conducted by the academic circles and solar energy industrial environments in Turkey. The obtained results were compared with the values operated by the private installation companies in the industry, these were interpreted, and the disagreements were revealed. Moreover, the study reveals some gaps in technical feasibility analysis, which the sector professionals usually ignore in the field. The findings were evaluated in monthly, annual, and seasonal time zones. The present study showed that the analysis, to which private companies in the field refer, is insufficient and the parameters that would guide the investor in detail could not be obtained. More detailed prospection has been obtained within the scope of this study.</p><p>Considering the whole of our findings, while the most advantageous location for investing in SPPs in Antalya with a total of 97.50 h monthly average sunshine duration and radiation of 59,599.6 W/m<sup>2</sup> throughout the year, the most disadvantaged location is Kahramanmaraş with a total monthly average sunshine duration of 80.80 h and a radiation value of 44,810.8 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year. Antalya is followed by Mardin location (monthly average sunshine duration of 96.10 h and radiation of 59,487.9 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year) and Karaman (monthly average sunshine duration of 94.40 h and radiation of 58,847.1 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solar energy technical feasibility comparison: an alternative proposal for the Industry\",\"authors\":\"Mert Gürtürk,&nbsp;Murat Erdem,&nbsp;Ferhat Uçar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12053-024-10226-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, 11 provinces with more than 1 MW solar power plants (SPP) in Turkey have been examined in terms of global solar radiation and power produced. The main objective of this study is to underline the serious differences in technical feasibility analysis conducted by the academic circles and solar energy industrial environments in Turkey. The obtained results were compared with the values operated by the private installation companies in the industry, these were interpreted, and the disagreements were revealed. Moreover, the study reveals some gaps in technical feasibility analysis, which the sector professionals usually ignore in the field. The findings were evaluated in monthly, annual, and seasonal time zones. The present study showed that the analysis, to which private companies in the field refer, is insufficient and the parameters that would guide the investor in detail could not be obtained. More detailed prospection has been obtained within the scope of this study.</p><p>Considering the whole of our findings, while the most advantageous location for investing in SPPs in Antalya with a total of 97.50 h monthly average sunshine duration and radiation of 59,599.6 W/m<sup>2</sup> throughout the year, the most disadvantaged location is Kahramanmaraş with a total monthly average sunshine duration of 80.80 h and a radiation value of 44,810.8 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year. Antalya is followed by Mardin location (monthly average sunshine duration of 96.10 h and radiation of 59,487.9 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year) and Karaman (monthly average sunshine duration of 94.40 h and radiation of 58,847.1 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10226-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10226-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究从全球太阳辐射和发电量的角度,对土耳其 11 个拥有 1 兆瓦以上太阳能发电厂(SPP)的省份进行了考察。本研究的主要目的是强调土耳其学术界和太阳能工业环境在技术可行性分析方面存在的严重差异。本研究将所获得的结果与私营安装公司在该行业中的操作值进行了比较,并对这些结果进行了解释,揭示了其中的分歧。此外,研究还揭示了技术可行性分析中存在的一些差距,而这正是该领域的专业人士通常所忽视的。研究结果按月、年和季节时区进行了评估。本研究表明,该领域的私营公司所参考的分析不够充分,无法获得指导投资者的详细参数。综合我们的研究结果,投资 SPP 的最有利地点是安塔利亚,月平均日照时间为 97.50 小时,全年辐射值为 59,599.6 瓦/平方米;最不利地点是卡赫拉曼马拉什,月平均日照时间为 80.80 小时,全年辐射值为 44,810.8 瓦/平方米。其次是安塔利亚的马尔丁(月平均日照时间为 96.10 小时,辐射值为 59 487.9 瓦/平方米-年)和卡拉曼(月平均日照时间为 94.40 小时,辐射值为 58 847.1 瓦/平方米-年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Solar energy technical feasibility comparison: an alternative proposal for the Industry

In this study, 11 provinces with more than 1 MW solar power plants (SPP) in Turkey have been examined in terms of global solar radiation and power produced. The main objective of this study is to underline the serious differences in technical feasibility analysis conducted by the academic circles and solar energy industrial environments in Turkey. The obtained results were compared with the values operated by the private installation companies in the industry, these were interpreted, and the disagreements were revealed. Moreover, the study reveals some gaps in technical feasibility analysis, which the sector professionals usually ignore in the field. The findings were evaluated in monthly, annual, and seasonal time zones. The present study showed that the analysis, to which private companies in the field refer, is insufficient and the parameters that would guide the investor in detail could not be obtained. More detailed prospection has been obtained within the scope of this study.

Considering the whole of our findings, while the most advantageous location for investing in SPPs in Antalya with a total of 97.50 h monthly average sunshine duration and radiation of 59,599.6 W/m2 throughout the year, the most disadvantaged location is Kahramanmaraş with a total monthly average sunshine duration of 80.80 h and a radiation value of 44,810.8 W/m2-year. Antalya is followed by Mardin location (monthly average sunshine duration of 96.10 h and radiation of 59,487.9 W/m2-year) and Karaman (monthly average sunshine duration of 94.40 h and radiation of 58,847.1 W/m2-year).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
期刊最新文献
A step towards energy efficiency in G7 countries: analyzing the role of economic complexity and shadow economy on energy intensity Pathways to commercial building plug and process load efficiency and control Wind-driven and buoyancy effects for modeling natural ventilation in buildings at urban scale A mixed-method approach to study the impacts of energy micro-generation combined with appliance-level feedback on everyday practices Do environment-related technologies, urbanization, trade openness, and income impact energy consumption and intensity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1