J. Buekers, Laura Delgado-Ortiz, D. Megaritis, Ashley Polhemus, S. Breuls, S. Buttery, N. Chynkiamis, H. Demeyer, E. Gimeno-Santos, Emily Hume, Sarah Koch, P. Williams, M. Wuyts, N. Hopkinson, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Thierry Troosters, Anja Frei, Judith Garcia-Aymerich
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病与健康对照组的步态差异:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"J. Buekers, Laura Delgado-Ortiz, D. Megaritis, Ashley Polhemus, S. Breuls, S. Buttery, N. Chynkiamis, H. Demeyer, E. Gimeno-Santos, Emily Hume, Sarah Koch, P. Williams, M. Wuyts, N. Hopkinson, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Thierry Troosters, Anja Frei, Judith Garcia-Aymerich","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0253-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Despite the importance of gait as a determinant of falls, disability and mortality in older people, understanding of gait impairment in COPD is limited. This study aimed to identify differences in gait characteristics during supervised walking tests between people with COPD and healthy controls. Methods We searched 11 electronic databases, supplemented by Google Scholar searches and manual collation of references, in November 2019 and updated the search in July 2021. Record screening and information extraction were performed independently by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second. Meta-analyses were performed in studies not considered at a high risk of bias. Results Searches yielded 21 085 unique records, of which 25 were included in the systematic review (including 1015 people with COPD and 2229 healthy controls). Gait speed was assessed in 17 studies (usual speed: 12; fast speed: three; both speeds: two), step length in nine, step duration in seven, cadence in six, and step width in five. Five studies were considered at a high risk of bias. Low-quality evidence indicated that people with COPD walk more slowly than healthy controls at their usual speed (mean difference (MD) −19 cm·s−1, 95% CI −28 to −11 cm·s−1) and at a fast speed (MD −30 cm·s−1, 95% CI −47 to −13 cm·s−1). Alterations in other gait characteristics were not statistically significant. Conclusion Low-quality evidence shows that people with COPD walk more slowly than healthy controls, which could contribute to an increased falls risk. The evidence for alterations in spatial and temporal components of gait was inconclusive. Gait impairment appears to be an important but understudied area in COPD.","PeriodicalId":9,"journal":{"name":"ACS Catalysis ","volume":"56 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait differences between COPD and healthy controls: systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Buekers, Laura Delgado-Ortiz, D. Megaritis, Ashley Polhemus, S. Breuls, S. Buttery, N. Chynkiamis, H. Demeyer, E. Gimeno-Santos, Emily Hume, Sarah Koch, P. Williams, M. Wuyts, N. Hopkinson, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Thierry Troosters, Anja Frei, Judith Garcia-Aymerich\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/16000617.0253-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Despite the importance of gait as a determinant of falls, disability and mortality in older people, understanding of gait impairment in COPD is limited. This study aimed to identify differences in gait characteristics during supervised walking tests between people with COPD and healthy controls. Methods We searched 11 electronic databases, supplemented by Google Scholar searches and manual collation of references, in November 2019 and updated the search in July 2021. Record screening and information extraction were performed independently by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second. Meta-analyses were performed in studies not considered at a high risk of bias. Results Searches yielded 21 085 unique records, of which 25 were included in the systematic review (including 1015 people with COPD and 2229 healthy controls). Gait speed was assessed in 17 studies (usual speed: 12; fast speed: three; both speeds: two), step length in nine, step duration in seven, cadence in six, and step width in five. Five studies were considered at a high risk of bias. Low-quality evidence indicated that people with COPD walk more slowly than healthy controls at their usual speed (mean difference (MD) −19 cm·s−1, 95% CI −28 to −11 cm·s−1) and at a fast speed (MD −30 cm·s−1, 95% CI −47 to −13 cm·s−1). Alterations in other gait characteristics were not statistically significant. Conclusion Low-quality evidence shows that people with COPD walk more slowly than healthy controls, which could contribute to an increased falls risk. The evidence for alterations in spatial and temporal components of gait was inconclusive. Gait impairment appears to be an important but understudied area in COPD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Catalysis \",\"volume\":\"56 33\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Catalysis \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0253-2023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Catalysis ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0253-2023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gait differences between COPD and healthy controls: systematic review and meta-analysis
Background Despite the importance of gait as a determinant of falls, disability and mortality in older people, understanding of gait impairment in COPD is limited. This study aimed to identify differences in gait characteristics during supervised walking tests between people with COPD and healthy controls. Methods We searched 11 electronic databases, supplemented by Google Scholar searches and manual collation of references, in November 2019 and updated the search in July 2021. Record screening and information extraction were performed independently by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second. Meta-analyses were performed in studies not considered at a high risk of bias. Results Searches yielded 21 085 unique records, of which 25 were included in the systematic review (including 1015 people with COPD and 2229 healthy controls). Gait speed was assessed in 17 studies (usual speed: 12; fast speed: three; both speeds: two), step length in nine, step duration in seven, cadence in six, and step width in five. Five studies were considered at a high risk of bias. Low-quality evidence indicated that people with COPD walk more slowly than healthy controls at their usual speed (mean difference (MD) −19 cm·s−1, 95% CI −28 to −11 cm·s−1) and at a fast speed (MD −30 cm·s−1, 95% CI −47 to −13 cm·s−1). Alterations in other gait characteristics were not statistically significant. Conclusion Low-quality evidence shows that people with COPD walk more slowly than healthy controls, which could contribute to an increased falls risk. The evidence for alterations in spatial and temporal components of gait was inconclusive. Gait impairment appears to be an important but understudied area in COPD.
期刊介绍:
ACS Catalysis is an esteemed journal that publishes original research in the fields of heterogeneous catalysis, molecular catalysis, and biocatalysis. It offers broad coverage across diverse areas such as life sciences, organometallics and synthesis, photochemistry and electrochemistry, drug discovery and synthesis, materials science, environmental protection, polymer discovery and synthesis, and energy and fuels.
The scope of the journal is to showcase innovative work in various aspects of catalysis. This includes new reactions and novel synthetic approaches utilizing known catalysts, the discovery or modification of new catalysts, elucidation of catalytic mechanisms through cutting-edge investigations, practical enhancements of existing processes, as well as conceptual advances in the field. Contributions to ACS Catalysis can encompass both experimental and theoretical research focused on catalytic molecules, macromolecules, and materials that exhibit catalytic turnover.